Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REPORT: Pentagon to drop 'Global War on Terror' for 'Overseas Contingency Operation'...
Drudge ^ | 3/25/09

Posted on 03/25/2009 4:23:48 AM PDT by FromLori

The end of the Global War on Terror -- or at least the use of that phrase -- has been codified at the Pentagon. Reports that the phrase was being retired have been circulating for some time amongst senior administration officials, and this morning speechwriters and other staff were notified via this e-mail to use "Overseas Contingency Operation" instead.

(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhodod; dod; drudge; ghogwot; gwot; oco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
This way code pink won't be able to protest...snicker
1 posted on 03/25/2009 4:23:48 AM PDT by FromLori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
A small sampler ON THE INTERNET:

FRONTPAGE MAGAZINE.com: "THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND RADICAL ISLAM" by Jamie Glazov (March 25, 2009)

WASHINGTON TIMES.com: "GAFFNEY: OUR ENEMIES SENSE WEAKNESS Retrenchments are perceived as exploitable openings" -Commentary by Frank J. Gaffney Jr (SNIPPET: "President Obama's stewardship of the national security portfolio to date amounts to a wrecking operation, a set of policies he must understand will not only weaken the United States but embolden our foes.") (March 24, 2009)

JIHAD WATCH.org (WASHINGTON POST.com): "IT'S NOT A WAR ON TERROR, IT'S AN 'OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATION'" (March 24, 2009)


DEFENSElink.mil (AMERICAN FORCES PRESS SERVICE): Washington - "MISSILE DEFENSE REQUIRES NEW FOCUS, VICE CHAIRMAN SAYS" by Army Staff Sgt. Michael J. Carden (March 23, 2009)


FOX NEWS.com: "'FUSION CENTERS' EXPAND CRITERIA TO IDENTIFY MILITIA MEMBERS" (SNIPPET: Do you like Ron Paul or oppose abortion? You may be a member of a militia, according to a new report by a government information collection agency.") by Joshua Rhett Miller (March 23, 2009)

WASHINGTON POST.com: "SECURITY WORRIES IN THE SUBURBS" by Jerry Markon (March 25, 2009)

2 posted on 03/25/2009 4:29:32 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

“Contingency Operation”??

Sounds threatening.

How about “Doing Something”?

As in “Doing Something Overseas”?

But “Overseas” sounds too imperialistic.

So “Doing Something Somewhere”?

But “Doing” thing sounds too war-like.

So “Contemplating Something Somewhere”.

There, that’s the new Zer0 foreign policy.


3 posted on 03/25/2009 4:32:45 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angkor

LOL


4 posted on 03/25/2009 4:38:21 AM PDT by alaskamomma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Rebranding of the War....err, Defense Establishment. Happens all the time new package - same product.


5 posted on 03/25/2009 4:42:24 AM PDT by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Bin Laden won :-(


6 posted on 03/25/2009 4:48:01 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angkor
LOL ... defaults to “do nothing”
7 posted on 03/25/2009 4:51:09 AM PDT by Tarpon (It's a common fact, one can't be liberal and rational at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

This was NOT the Pentagon’s decision, it was the Obama administration relayed to the Pentagon via OMB (Office of Management and Budget).


8 posted on 03/25/2009 4:53:58 AM PDT by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

What about the threat of terror over HERE?


9 posted on 03/25/2009 4:56:25 AM PDT by paulycy (BEWARE the LIBERAL/MEDIA Complex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

definition -
Contingency: 1)An event that may occur but that is not likely or intended; a possibility; 2)The condition of being dependent on chance; uncertainty.

That describes the Obama Administration’s thinking right there. Instead of realizing that a terrorist attack against us either overseas or on home turf is definitely going to happen, they think we’re fighting and dying for something that isn’t likely.


10 posted on 03/25/2009 4:58:57 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Yep. Them Muzzies will be dancin in the streets.


11 posted on 03/25/2009 4:59:21 AM PDT by wolfcreek (There is no 2 party system only arrogant Pols and their handlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

(DOD) A military operation that is either designated by the Secretary of Defense as a contingency operation or becomes a contingency operation as a matter of law (10 United States code (USC) 101[a][13]). It is a military operation that: a. is designated by the Secretary of Defense as an operation in which members of the Armed Forces are or may become involved in military actions, operations, or hostilities against an enemy of the United States or against an opposing force; or b. is created by definition of law. Under 10 USC 101 (a)(13)(B), a contingency operation exists if a military operation results in the (1) callup to (or retention on) active duty of members of the uniformed Services under certain enumerated statutes (10 USC Sections 688, 12301(a), 12302, 12304, 12305, 12406, or 331-335); and (2) the callup to (or retention on) active duty of members of the uniformed Services under other (non-enumerated) statutes during war or national emergency declared by the President or Congress.


12 posted on 03/25/2009 5:05:22 AM PDT by verity ("Lord, what fools we mortals be!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: verity

Oh brother. These dopey dems wouldn’t say poop if they had a mouthful, would they?


13 posted on 03/25/2009 5:26:29 AM PDT by Dinah Lord (fighting the Islamofascist Jihad - one keystroke at a time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: verity

and your point is?


14 posted on 03/25/2009 5:32:57 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Simple. Your definition is wrong.


15 posted on 03/25/2009 5:34:50 AM PDT by verity ("Lord, what fools we mortals be!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

The Korean War was an “Armed Expedition” but at least we won.

How do you win an overseas contingency operation?


16 posted on 03/25/2009 5:43:46 AM PDT by silverleaf (Freedom's just another word for "nothing left to lose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

He could send his youth movement to infest them with crime!


17 posted on 03/25/2009 5:44:53 AM PDT by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

ah, but he needs them to do that in Connecticut


18 posted on 03/25/2009 5:46:49 AM PDT by silverleaf (Freedom's just another word for "nothing left to lose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

How long before it becomes something like “Brotherly Love Accomodations”?

(Hell, I don’t know what that means either, but it sounds good.)


19 posted on 03/25/2009 6:06:10 AM PDT by CPOSharky (Zero: I don't care about the country as long as I'm in charge. Forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
The end of the Global War on Terror -- or at least the use of that phrase
Good.
That phrase was utter;y STOO-PID because we never were in any 'Global War'. It was just another dumb catch phrase the neocons dreamed up like Axis of Evil.

If we were in a Global War, we'd be fighting from the Middle East to the Horn of Africa to Tibet and even Chechnya helping our Russian ally, against 'Global Terrorists'. And we would need an Army of 20,000,000.

But we weren't, so there wasn't.

Even WWII wasn't a 'Global War'. In our own backyard, from Mexico to the tip of South America - all were neutral. (Panama Canal Zone doesn't count)

20 posted on 03/25/2009 6:11:20 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson