Posted on 03/15/2009 1:24:02 PM PDT by SvenMagnussen
The Natural Born Citizen Blog Is Now Restricted
There exists a statute enacted by Congress wherein it exercised Constitutional authority to challenge the credentials of, and/or remove, a sitting President found to be a usurper by failing to possess Article 2 Section 1 qualifications for holding the office of President of the United States. The Statute exists in the District of Columbia Code, the same Code which includes the United States Constitution.
District of Columbia Code Section 16-3501 states:
§ 16-3501. Persons against whom issued; civil action.
A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.
This is the only statute in the entire body of United States federal law which specifically provides for removing all officers of the United States located in the District of Columbia, whether appointed or elected. In Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17, Congress was given broad sweeping authority over every possible legal case involving offices of the Government of the United States located in the District of Columbia. The office of President of the United States is in the District of Columbia and is certainly governed by the United States Constitution. Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17 states:
“The Congress shall have Power To… exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States…”
(Excerpt) Read more at naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com ...
But where in DC are you going to find a public official to enforce this law against a DemocRAT president?
I remember a day when we only had to have a Presidential candidate file a complaint to overcome the standing issue and Obama would be forced to answer.
Now, it seems, a laundry list of additional legal conditions must be met before anyone can see Obama’s qualifying papers.
Is Marion Barry still in office?
You could offer him a kilo of coke.
He’d turn in his children for that.
That would be a minor miracle.
Confusing title
I’d sure like to know what the hell prevents Hugo Chavez, Bin Laden, or George Soros from running since all that’s required is to say they were born here and no one has standing to prove otherwise.
I would relay your commentary to Leo, but I don’t think he accepts criticism well.
You’ll have to notify him yourself.
Excellent info. Can someone alter future posts so that the main article does not appear with a black backdrop. Makes for VERY difficult reading. Thx.
LOL... it will never work. There are no balls in DC. Besides, Obama would simply move the Capital to Chicago..... or Hawaii, where he can be close to his birth certificate. LOL
ping
Oh my aching head ping...
We've got him. His name is Obama/Soetero
Thanks for the ping, null and void.
Maybe I should send this article to McCain so he can jump right on it!
Yeah, my head hurts, too.
It will take more action than I ever thought to get our country back! We are really needing to fight against the New World Order! Looks like plans for the New World Order run from FDR to Obama and they are almost completed.
The present Congress is working hard to get the following passed: HR1022, HR645, HR875, HR1833. Fight we must to save our Constitutional Republic!
I think he could be bought for just a line or two and a cheap whore.
You mean kenya dont you.
There would be danger in procuring sex or commingling with DC denizens! HERE IS HEADLINE ON DRUDGE RIGHT NOW!
- also, I’m trying to find Oliver Cromwell’s severe denunciation of the immoral Parliament he made to effectively take reigns via military coup- I hate Cromwell but ran into this speech a while ago and should have copied it-any help?:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/14/AR2009031402176_pf.html
HIV/AIDS Rate in D.C. Hits 3%
Considered a ‘Severe’ Epidemic, Every Mode of Transmission Is Increasing, City Study Finds
By Jose Antonio Vargas and Darryl Fears
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, March 15, 2009; A01
At least 3 percent of District residents have HIV or AIDS, a total that far surpasses the 1 percent threshold that constitutes a “generalized and severe” epidemic, according to a report scheduled to be released by health officials tomorrow.
That translates into 2,984 residents per every 100,000 over the age of 12 — or 15,120 — according to the 2008 epidemiology report by the District’s HIV/AIDS office.
“Our rates are higher than West Africa,” said Shannon L. Hader, director of the District’s HIV/AIDS Administration, who once led the Federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s work in Zimbabwe. “They’re on par with Uganda and some parts of Kenya.”
“We have every mode of transmission” — men having sex with men, heterosexual and injected drug use — “going up, all on the rise, and we have to deal with them,” Hader said....
[snip]
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.