Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUmmie FUnnies 03-04-09 (HUffie: Democrats Are Empowering Rush Limbaugh)
DUmmie FUnnies ^ | March 4, 2009 | PJ-Comix

Posted on 03/04/2009 7:01:17 AM PST by PJ-Comix

Peter Daou of the HUffington Post has had the jobs that political player wannabee William Rivers Pitt could only dream about. Daou has been an integral part of both the Hillary Clinton and John Kerry campaigns among many other things. Therefore, when Daou warns the Democrats that they are making a big mistake by focusing on and attacking Rush Limbaugh, smart folks should pay attention to the warning he posted in this HUffington Post THREAD, "Why on Earth Are Democrats Legitimizing and Empowering Rush Limbaugh?" Yeah, by focusing on Rush Limbaugh, Barack Obama and his fellow Democrats are making more people who never listened to him before tune in thus generating yet more dittoheads. Great move...NOT! However, many HUffies disagree with Daou and want to continue with the ultimately self-defeating attacks on Rush. So let us now watch the HUffies inadvertently call for the elevation of Rush Limbaugh in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, about to put out an APB on Randi Rhodes, is in the [barackets]:

I don't buy into this 'brilliant' strategy of elevating Rush Limbaugh in the hopes that it will tarnish Republicans.

[But...but William Rivers Pitt thinks that strategy is absolutely brilliant. Stand by now as Peter lists his Democrat bonafides to establish leftwing credibility...]

Focus relentlessly on the disastrous Bush presidency to tarnish Republicans, yes.

[BUSH'S FAULT!]

Overturn every single illegal and unconstitutional Bush-era policy and show the country and the world that we're reclaiming the moral high ground, yes.

[BUSH'S FAULT!]

Implement bold strategies and use soaring rhetoric to inspire Americans, yes.

[Uh, um, like, uh, ok.]

Hew fiercely to Democratic principles, reassert the greatness of our American identity, demonstrate the true meaning of liberalism, of progressivism, providing opportunity, seeking justice and fairness, helping those in need, yes.

[We got it. You're a liberal!]

Spend our resources healing the sick, feeding the hungry, lifting the poor, cleaning the planet, rather than on war and more war, yes.

[You left out the walking on water part.]

But expand Rush Limbaugh's profile and platform? No.

[Yes.]

It's bad for the country and it's bad politics. Limbaugh and his cohorts (Coulter, Hannity, Beck, Savage, and so on), are largely responsible for our toxic political environment. Given major media platforms to launch crude and brutal political and cultural attacks, to demonize liberals, and to use rage as a means of lining their own pockets, these 'entertainers' have poisoned our national discourse.

[Return of the "Fairness Doctrine?"]

There's precious little benefit in making Limbaugh more of a central player, in engaging him directly from the White House podium, in raising his stature, in stamping, sealing and approving the years he's spent bashing his political opponents. There was a moment, a brief moment, after Barack Obama was elected president, a moment long gone, where the likes of Limbaugh and Hannity could have become marginalized, bit players rather than media movers and shakers, the detritus of a sorry era. But instead, they have been granted more power -- out of some contrived political calculus. This, at a time when we don't need political calculus, we need single-minded determination to get us out of this economic calamity and to restore sanity to our government.

[Contrived political calculus hatched at early morning conference calls between Rahm Emanuel, James Carville, The Forehead, and George Stephanopoulus.]

I know it's hard for Democrats to appreciate how quickly political fortunes turn -- the glow of victory, the high of electoral success gives a sense of inevitability and invincibility, of permanence. But there's nothing permanent about power. The tide will turn again, and the engine that will drive it is the fury stirred by the likes of Limbaugh. Feeding that machine, expanding and enhancing it is a mistake. A serious one.

[Keep on feeding the Rush machine!]

It's a truism that victory makes every decision seem genius, defeat, the reverse. Democrats, now in power, have a sense of triumph that makes every decision feel smart, every chess move a checkmate. Thus the "Rush strategy" foisted on those of us who have spent the past decade trying to point out how noxious and pernicious Limbaugh and his ilk have been (and continue to be), and how detrimental the anger they've stoked.

[Hmmm... Does anybody know if President Eisenhower was completely obsessed with Gabriel Heater?]

Empowering Limbaugh in the hopes of a bank-shot against Republicans will yield the opposite result: Limbaugh will become more powerful, Republicans will relish his increased influence and allow him to do their dirty work.

[I'm hearing the "Getting Stronger" Rocky theme song in the background. And now to hear from the HUffies determined to empower Rush...]

I think it is a good strategy. Limbaugh is an odious and self evidently wrong character that brands his party unfavorably. People are angry and they should be. Limbaugh did not create or inspire this anger, he misdirected it. His spell is broken for most people. Make him the face of conservatism and leave them the votes only of the most wealthy and the 17% or so of unreachable, finding Cheney favorable, reality denying true believers.

[Declared the suicidal HUffie.]

There's precious little benefit in making Limbaugh more of a central player, in engaging him directly from the White House podium, in raising his stature, in stamping, sealing and approving the years he's spent bashing his political opponents. I AGREE WITH YOU, PETER. AND I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY WHY WHY THE DEMOCRATS -MSNBC, ETC. ARE GIVING HIM EVEN ONE OF THEIR PRECIOUS BREATHS!!!

[Shhh! Please continue to allow them to take the WRONG path.]

This idea of him being unpopular is sadly not true...his radio audience just doesn't consist of diehard right kooks...the data on listeners shows that repeatedly...some Dems like Emanuel would like to perpetuate this sorry myth.

[The Dittohead army grows stronger every day thanks in large part to Rahm drawing attention to Rush.]

I agree. It's a cynical move that might backfire. Less cynicism please.

[Shhhhh!]

It's the beginning of the end for Limbaugh and his hate mongering ilk.

[I've been hearing that since about 1990. And does anybody remember how many media types were writing Rush off as "irrelevant" just a year ago?]

Limbaugh is such an easy target. I would absolutely crush him if I had a lot of media support. He would have to go for years of therapy after the humiliation I would deliver.

["Humiliation" delivered by a long, inarticulate screech.]

I would not have heard about Rush's latest actions had it not been for the commentators that were critical of him. I share some of the concerns of this article

[The Democrat PR just makes El Rushbo's audience bigger.]

The threat Rush poses is that people will start listening to him once they become disillusioned with the present policy, and then the listener begins to question the ideologies they have been force fed. That is why this attempt is to destroy him. Law 43 in the Play book.

[This is why the Rahmbo plan will FAIL. Most liberals who are attacking Rush never actually listen to him. Once more people start listening to Rush due to the publicity generated by the attacks on him, the more his ideas will permeate the land. So those Democrats plotting the demise of Rush by focusing attention on him are too cute by half and should be thanked for causing a huge BACKFIRE. Peter Daou is right but please continue to NOT take his advice. However, I will now allow Daou the last word...]

The idea that making him more powerful in the hopes that it somehow illustrates the weakness of GOP ideas is too Rube Golbergy for me.


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: huffies; huffingtonpost; rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: PJ-Comix
Implement bold strategies and use soaring rhetoric to inspire Americans, yes.

[Uh, um, like, uh, ok.]

Gimmie, gimmie, gimmie. Gimmie, gimmie, gimmie. Gimmie, gimmie, gimmie. Gimmie, gimmie, gimmie. Gimmie, gimmie, gimmie. Gimmie, gimmie, gimmie.


Spend our resources healing the sick, feeding the hungry, lifting the poor, cleaning the planet, rather than on war and more war, yes.

[You left out the walking on water part.]

Spend OTHER PEOPLES' resources healing the sick, feeding the hungry, lifting the poor, cleaning the planet, rather than on war and more war

Tax and spend. Tax and spend.
Tax and spend. Tax and spend.
Tax and spend. Tax and spend.
Tax and spend. Tax and spend.
Tax and spend. Tax and spend.
Repeat as needed until everyone is equally poor.


. . . . . The tide will turn again, and the engine that will drive it is the fury stirred by the likes of Limbaugh. Feeding that machine, expanding and enhancing it is a mistake. A serious one.

[Keep on feeding the Rush machine!]

Keep on feeding the Rush machine until the excrement hits the ventilator.


Make him the face of conservatism and leave them the votes only of the most wealthy and the 17% or so of unreachable, finding Cheney favorable, reality denying true believers.

[Declared the suicidal HUffie.]

20 million listeners are going to be surprised.


I would not have heard about Rush's latest actions had it not been for the commentators that were critical of him. I share some of the concerns of this article

[The Democrat PR just makes El Rushbo's audience bigger.]

Well, just a few months ago, the dims said Rush was only "an entertainer".

21 posted on 03/04/2009 7:47:42 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (It took almost 250 years to make the USA great and 30 days for BO to tear it down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pete98
It will backfire when the average American sees that Obama will allow absolutely no questioning or criticism of Himself.

As much as I would like this to come true, I really don't think it will. As long as Opossum keeps promising the black voter something-for-nothing, the more entrenched for him they'll be.

In turn, they will label any criticism as racist and the vast majority of simple-minded white folks will just sit in a corner and suck their thumbs.

22 posted on 03/04/2009 7:49:19 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (FreepMail me if you want on the Bourbon ping list!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Rush wins the title of democrat/media enemy number one by default because there are no outspoken Republican politicians left in Washington. The truth is that you liberals must have someone to hate, someone to focus on, someone to obsess over, someone to blame all the world’s problems on. Myself and millions of other non-liberals instantly knew that Rush would become the focus of your hatred as soon as McCain lost the election.


23 posted on 03/04/2009 7:49:46 AM PST by faq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Drudge Headline...
WHITE HOUSE PLOTS LIMBAUGH COVERAGE; TEAM OBAMA TARGETS PRIVATE CITIZEN
Now when has the leader of ANY country ever "targeted" a single PRIVATE CITIZEN as an enemy, as part of their 'policy' and IN PUBLIC? Not even totalitarian despots have done this.

Lenin didn't
Stalin didn't
Mussolini didn't
Hitler didn't
Mao didn't
Castro didn't
'heck', even Pol Pot didn't!
They went after groups as 'enemies of the state', or Politcial Party leaders not individual citizens.

This is a dangerous road The Kenyan and his political hitman Rahm Emmanual are hoeing. They *may* be looking at biting off more than they can chew. IMO it's getting more and more like they WANT Civil War v2.0.

They're acting like that kid in the school yard who always pushed you then dared you to hit him. When you finally did he was shocked, and ran home to mommy crying.

24 posted on 03/04/2009 7:56:43 AM PST by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
"IMO it's getting more and more like they WANT Civil War v2.0."

I think you may be correct here. However, I do believe they think it would benefit them.....and they couldn't be more wrong.

25 posted on 03/04/2009 8:00:30 AM PST by NoGrayZone (Who Is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
Addendum... NEW Drudge Headline
ENEMIES LIST: WHITE HOUSE PLOTS LIMBAUGH COVERAGE
Barry and Rahm are asking for it. This is getting worse than Stalinism. The pooh is gonna hit the fan.
26 posted on 03/04/2009 8:02:49 AM PST by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

I was starting to visit the DUmp to see first hand the libtards in action. I lasted about a week. The constant idiocy portrayed is just too much for me to handle. How you monitor these fools on a regular basis without losing your mind?


27 posted on 03/04/2009 8:02:51 AM PST by GQuagmire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
The threat Rush poses is that people will start listening to him once they become disillusioned with the present policy, and then the listener begins to question the ideologies they have been force fed.

That's a pretty devastating admission there. Force fed by whom?

28 posted on 03/04/2009 8:13:21 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (Pretending the Admin Moderator doesn't exist will result in suspension.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Actually, I *agree* with the Dummies on this one. Trying to face down Rush, Cramer, Santelli, Joe The Plumber, etc etc, etc....just elevates their stature. The correct play for the White House is to ignore these people. Dealing in the trivial gets the White House off message.

That's why I love the fact that Obama and that bumbling incompetent he has for a press secretary, keep making the same mistake over and over. Every minute that they're cutting into one talking head or another over some trivial disagreement, is one minute that they're not pushing their agenda. Go Rush!

29 posted on 03/04/2009 8:14:13 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
The irony is that there are some, ok a few, on the Right, (yes, even here at FR), who could have made many of the comments regurgitated by the naiveté at the Huff Post
30 posted on 03/04/2009 8:17:19 AM PST by jla (Sarah! sarahpac.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RebelTex

Song of the South

Rush = Tarbaby

Go ahead Rahm, punch him again


31 posted on 03/04/2009 8:17:43 AM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution - 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jcb2009

Thanx for the Estrich info. I just used it as a basis for a NewsBusters story.


32 posted on 03/04/2009 8:18:37 AM PST by PJ-Comix (Stop Road Rage or...I'LL KILL YOU!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wbill

These are HUffies, not DUmmies.


33 posted on 03/04/2009 8:19:45 AM PST by PJ-Comix (Stop Road Rage or...I'LL KILL YOU!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

These were HUffies, not DUmmies. A HUffie is a DUmmie with a job.


34 posted on 03/04/2009 8:20:59 AM PST by PJ-Comix (Stop Road Rage or...I'LL KILL YOU!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Ahhhh, pardon me. I didn't realize there was a difference.

Or, perhaps it's like the difference between a Bull and and Steer. VERY important to the bovine in question, not so much to the rest of the world. :-)

35 posted on 03/04/2009 8:23:02 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone
*** I think you may be correct here. However, I do believe they think it would benefit them.....and they couldn't be more wrong. ***

Yep, they do *think* it will benefit them and yes they couldn't be more wrong.

There's still 80,000,000(1) ARMED Citizens.
And IMO that's why Holder and Barry want a 'new and improved' AWB passed asap.

(1) Pretty sure that's the number I read the other day.

36 posted on 03/04/2009 8:27:06 AM PST by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

God Bless our Founding Fathers for the 2nd amendment. They KNEW we would need it someday.


37 posted on 03/04/2009 8:36:37 AM PST by NoGrayZone (Who Is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

HUffie,DUmmie,KOSsacks...Libtards of a feather flock together.


38 posted on 03/04/2009 8:38:12 AM PST by GQuagmire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
LOL even this moron of a president should know better than to get into a pissing contest with Limbaugh private citizen.

Limbaugh's not the only one they've singled out this week. All are media personalities, but to be singled out by a sitting president/administration is absurd.

39 posted on 03/04/2009 8:41:58 AM PST by bcsco (Illinois politicians should be read their Miranda rights when sworn in to office...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wbill
Ahhhh, pardon me. I didn't realize there was a difference.

A HUffie is a DUmmie with a job.

40 posted on 03/04/2009 8:53:00 AM PST by PJ-Comix (Stop Road Rage or...I'LL KILL YOU!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson