Posted on 03/02/2009 12:24:01 PM PST by Federalist Patriot
Here is video from The View today where the ladies were hot and bothered over Rush Limbaugh's speech at CPAC! Elisabeth Hasselbeck stood up for Rush, but the other three "ladies" went after him. Whoopi Goldberg said his comments were "crappy," especially him saying he hopes Obama fails when we haven't even tried his approach yet. . . . . . (Watch Video)
(Excerpt) Read more at freedomslighthouse.com ...
A “Get over it! moment?
Way to go Elisabeth, she stuck to her guns bigtime. Perhaps they can pull up some old Piews and show their support for the war at the beginning? Guess Fraudulent 911 was never made or the Truthers never happened.
Pray for America, Our Troops and obama’s Failure
Helen Thomas was never young, and she was never pretty.
I think I just threw up in my mouth a little...
6/8 wasted breasts.
>>”The View” Ladies Get Hot And Bothered<<
That happens to women of a certain age.
Well ... nice headlights anyway.
I got my monthly laugh seeing this morons.
> Rushs saying that he wants Obamas policies to fail is
> no different than the liberals saying they dont support
> the mission of our troops in Iraq.
Sorry, but your dismal attempt at moral equivalence does *NOT* prevail!
You may as well say that Islam, The Religion of Barbaric Savages, is no different than any another religion like, say, the Mennonites.
What Barry Hussein is doing is not only UN-constitutional, it is ANTI-constitutional.
Bush was acting on information that Iraq had WMD and that the US was in imminent danger. Given the deaths of more than 3000 Americans and the smoking crater left in downtown Manhattan at the hands of the Mahometan savages, I’d say that he was COMPELLED by his clearly defined Constitutional duty to destroy Iraq’s military capability, whatever our disagreements may be concering the execution and delivery of same.
Barack has no such compelling constitutional duty to nationalilze the banks, destroy free enterprise, force doctors and hospitals to murder gestate children against their consciences, infringe on our rights to keep and bear arms, restrict our freedom of speech, and any other number of egregious usurpations and acts of malfeasance in direct opposition to the Constitution.
You either misread my comments or didn't understand them as written. I have no idea why you went off on the avenue you did.
> You either misread my comments or didn’t understand them as written.
Sorry. I mistook you for a troll. There have been a lot of them lately.
Nevertheless, Rush’s desire for zer0bama to fail is not the same as the DemonRATs’ desire for the U.S. military to fail in Iraq. There’s nobody taking live fire or IEDs if zer0 fails.
Don't be too sure about that. His policies will destroy this nation's security and our ability to protect ourselves. He's taking us back to 9/10, and people will pay with their lives once again.
> His policies will destroy this nation’s security and our
> ability to protect ourselves. He’s taking us back to
> 9/10, and people will pay with their lives once again.
True enough, but in doing so, he is setting himself up for catastrophic failure.
If he wasn’t such a worldly street thug, I’d take him for a rube.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.