[Westbrook]

> Rush’s saying that he wants Obama’s policies to fail is
> no different than the liberals saying they don’t support
> the mission of our troops in Iraq.

Sorry, but your dismal attempt at moral equivalence does *NOT* prevail!

You may as well say that Islam, The Religion of Barbaric Savages, is no different than any another religion like, say, the Mennonites.

What Barry Hussein is doing is not only UN-constitutional, it is ANTI-constitutional.

Bush was acting on information that Iraq had WMD and that the US was in imminent danger. Given the deaths of more than 3000 Americans and the smoking crater left in downtown Manhattan at the hands of the Mahometan savages, I’d say that he was COMPELLED by his clearly defined Constitutional duty to destroy Iraq’s military capability, whatever our disagreements may be concering the execution and delivery of same.

Barack has no such compelling constitutional duty to nationalilze the banks, destroy free enterprise, force doctors and hospitals to murder gestate children against their consciences, infringe on our rights to keep and bear arms, restrict our freedom of speech, and any other number of egregious usurpations and acts of malfeasance in direct opposition to the Constitution.

[mass55th]

What are you talking about? This thread was about Limbaugh's speech at CPAC, and how liberals are bitching because he said he wanted Obama's policies to fail. My statement was made to show the hypocrisy of liberals being upset over Rush's comment, yet they themselves said they didn't support the mission our troops in Iraq were performing, which in essence meant, they wanted it to fail.

You either misread my comments or didn't understand them as written. I have no idea why you went off on the avenue you did.