The Charles Darwin Cultists

Coincidence Theories ^

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

As if evidence that evolanders belong to a Darwin Cult wasn’t already ubiquitous, we have this:

Happy Birthday Darwin

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

Check out some of these freaks and geeks.

Unfortunately, Charles Darwin cultists have done a little more to society than sing badly: Inbred Science

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

Happy Birthday Darwin ping!

[jiggyboy]

Were my morning radio DJ’s “Lincoln cultists” the other day for noting Abraham Lincoln’s?

[whattajoke]

Free Republic: Home to Evolution Deniers Obsessed with Charles Darwin.

BTW, I’m anxious as to what you’ll write in regards to Piltdown man, Nebraska Man, and Peking Man on your site. I see you plan to. The timeline of events are certainly interesting and I’m curious as to how you will document them.

Also, as a favor, I noticed a guy holding up Tiktaalik in that silly video. What is the current creationist understanding of that creature? Did they also predict it would exist in the fossil record exactly where it was later found? If not, what were their predictions regarding Tiktaalik.

Thanks.

[GodGunsGuts]

Is Inbred Science your site? Very impressive!

[XR7]

Anybody willing to bet that they are not all democRATS and socialists?

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[LiteKeeper]

INTREP

[opaque soul]

Ask Darwin to explain Irreducible Complexity, or which came first the DNA or the folded protein chain?

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

Ask Darwin to explain Irreducible Complexity, or which came first the DNA or the folded protein chain?

Better yet, ask him to explain natural selection without appealing to the bogus Malthus population principle.

[Fiji Hill]

Ask Darwin to explain Irreducible Complexity, or which came first the DNA or the folded protein chain?
Better yet, ask him to explain natural selection without appealing to the bogus Malthus population principle.

Perhaps some creationist could explain how fruit trees were able to survive before the sun was created.

[ToGodBeTheGlory]

Evo-atheists can’t discuss evolution without Malthus and his preposterous idea that populations that are unchecked will increase geometrically. It’s so obvious to anybody who looks at nature that most organisms that are born survive to reproduce, yet evo-cultists want us to believe that God is cruel and would allow for a world “Red in tooth and claw”. It’s just a way to attack the beauty of God’s Creation.

[count-your-change]

Not a creationist but I'd respond to your question if you’d elaborate a bit.

[whattajoke]

Ask Darwin to explain Irreducible Complexity, or which came first the DNA or the folded protein chain?

Newsflash: Charles Darwin is dead. Having been a mere mortal human, he cannot be reached for comment.

[Fiji Hill]

Gen. 1:12-17 seems to say that the creation of fruit trees and other plants occurred before the creation of the sun.

[count-your-change]

Please note the difference between the terms create and the
“make” of vs. 16. The account says the sun would only now dominate the day and was distinct enough to serve as time markers and to shine upon the earth.

As Gen. 1:1 says the heavens and earth had already been created.

[opaque soul]

Ever heard of speaking rhetorically?

[js1138]

Also, as a favor, I noticed a guy holding up Tiktaalik in that silly video. What is the current creationist understanding of that creature? Did they also predict it would exist in the fossil record exactly where it was later found? If not, what were their predictions regarding Tiktaalik.

Holding my breath...

[whattajoke]

Ever heard of speaking rhetorically?

Of course. But I just want to make sure all the creationists who harbor fantasies of "Darwin Churches" and "Cults of Darwin" (See thread title) understood that no one on the earth deifies Charles Darwin or thinks he was on the earth in order to die so we could later talk to him in private in order for him to save us from our sins.

That was another guy.