Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"A $550 BILLION ELECTRONIC RUN ON THE BANKS" (This Economic Meltdown Was Engineered, Folks!]
AtlasShrugs ^

Posted on 02/11/2009 10:55:18 AM PST by TruthHound

RIGHT BEFORE THE ELECTION OF PRESIDENT HUSSEIN: "A $550 BILLION ELECTRONIC RUN ON THE BANKS"

This is un-frickin-believable. The financial crisis was deliberate, planned, staged. Who made the run? "Someone threw us in the middle of the Atlantic ocean without a life raft. We are trying to determine which is the closest shore and whether there is any chance in the world to swim that far. We don't know."

Electronic Run On Banks - $550 Billion Withdrawn In 1 Hour, Federal Reserve Halts Withdrawals - US Economy Would Have Collapsed Capitalism Gone Wild hat tip Cathy

Rep. Paul Kanjorski of Pennsylvania explains what former Treasury Secretary Paulson and Fed Chairman Bernanke told congress during the September 2008 closed door session. During the first third of the video an enraged caller is ranting to Rep. Kanjorski about how wasteful the first $700 billion bailout was. The best part is 2 minutes and 15 seconds into the tape where Rep. Kanjorski reveals what Paulson and Bernanke told congress that shocked them into supporting the first $700 billion bailout.

On Thursday Sept 15, 2008 at roughly 11 AM The Federal Reserve noticed a tremendous draw down of money market accounts in the USA to the tune of $550 Billion dollars in a matter of an hour or two. Money was being removed electronically.

The Treasury tried to help, opened their window and pumped in $150 Billion but quickly realized they could not stem the tide. We were having an electronic run on the banks. So they decided to closed down the accounts.

Had they not closed down the accounts they estimated that by 2 PM that afternoon. Within 3 hours. $5.5 Trillion would have been withdrawn and the entire economy of the United States would have collapsed, and within 24 hours the world economy would have collapsed.

Kanjorski also explains why Paulson spent the bailout money differently than he originally proposed.

Some other gems from the recording:

It would have been the end of our economic and political system.

We would have had to spend 3 to 4 Trillion dollars to buy up all the toxic assets. But we didn't have that much we only had 700 Billion.

Without a banking system you don't have an economy.

We are no better off now than we were three months ago.

Someone threw us in the middle of the Atlantic ocean without a life raft. We are trying to determine which is the closest shore and whether there is any chance in the world to swim that far. We don't know.

More to think about. Somebody took a lot of money out of the banks. A lot.

So where did it go? Who to? And who got it? When? And where?

Somebody knows. Those transactions have been investigated, and somebody knows. But they ain't talking, are they?

John Jay posits - there has to be a reason why: --this hasn't been heretofore revealed --why those who received the deposits haven't been identified --why there is no explanation for their motives, and --why this has just now been revealed.

The motive part is very interesting, isn't it? Now, a person does no wrong, in and of itself, by taking his money from his accounts, perfectly legal, and absolutely unpreventable by any means other than the government shutting down or closing the market, as it did, to prevent/stop the run.

A run is a banker's term of art, and it is like a herd stampede, or panic, or a psychosis of a lot of people.

They say 4 or 5 trillion dollars could have been emptied out of the bank by the end of that business day. Presumably, it could not have gone all to one entity, else that entity just could have gone back when the markets opened, and continued to withdraw funds. So, if it were designed as action to induce a panic, it had to have been done in a way that the new would spread quickly, go "viral" as it were, to others holding funds or control over funds in similar banking institutions/markets. So, the transaction had to be public, or at least traceable, because they had to be noticeable, and they had to instill a panic so that the run would continue, and people would be noticing what was happening and would move to preserve and protect what money they could access.

So, it wasn't silent.

It wasn't stealth.

Just the opposite. It had to be noticed, to work, to induce the panic in the number of people required to induce the panic.

So, the people who do such things, who monitor who and where the orders come from, and who keep track of whose accounts the money is taken from, have to have been able to figure that out, and who was responsible.

Yet, they do not tell us.

Why?

They should be able to.

There is one more context. People where really abuzz trying to stop this latest round of Obama legislation, and considerable heat was being brought to bear on this.

Obama & his minions choose this C-span broadcast/interview, complete with screaming put-upon lady, so that Rep. Kanjorsky (Democrat, Pennsylvania) can tell us all just how close we came to financial panic and collapse, no doubt to stir us to support for Obama.

Can there be any other reason for it. Seems to me, you'd kinda want to keep a lid on it,just like everybody did.

Now, the other question that comes to my mind, is just when the Republicans went into the tank on the republic election. It is too bad we don't have the collective memory to remember just when McCain officially threw in the towel, and whether it had any connection to this. He most assuredly would have known. Palin most assuredly would not have, in all likelihood.

The Wall Street boys knew.

The regulators, the Federal Reserve knew, and nary a boo, peep or squeak out of any of 'em, until now.

A Congress that can keep a secret? Pretty unheard of in this day and age. but, up til now .... .

So, why bust the news now?

And while I do not pretend to be on the inside of any of these nefarious machinations - it can't help but raise a red that the US treasury department, one week after nationalizing the banks, is giving seminars in Islamic finance and George Soros is buying our assets from the FDIC.

And WTF did Chuck Schumer know and when did he know it? Look Who's Buying IndyMac Larry Johnson, American Thinker

The FDIC has just announced that a consortium of private equity and hedge fund firms would be buying IndyMac. IndyMac was an independent "bridge bank" spun off of Countrywide Mortgage in the late 90s. IndyMac acted as a "bridge bank" to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. New York Democrat Charles Shumer precipitated the fall of IndyMac in May of 2008 by releasing "inside" information that the mortgage company was in dire financial straits. This disclosure created the initial "bank run" that is credited by many economists as the initial trigger that prompted the current mortgage crisis. The FDIC took over the operations of IndyMac in late summer of 2008.

So much for history. George Soros is in on the deal to buy IndyMac from the FDIC. Soros has a long history of making loads of money by first creating a financial crisis and then stepping in to grab up the bargains. Perhaps the most famous example of this tactic is "Black Wednesday," when Soros nearly sunk the entire economy of Great Britain through currency speculation.

George Soros has helped bankroll the campaigns of the Democrats in Congress who created this mess. Now, it appears, he is cashing in on his investment.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 091508; 111th; bho2009; democratcongress; democrats; economy; econoterrorism; financialcrisis; financialterrorism; fundedbysoros; moveon; obama; octobersurprise; runontthebanks; septembersurprise; sorocrats; soros; tm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last
To: antceecee

Thank YOU. I’ve watched the vid twice already.


101 posted on 02/11/2009 12:00:51 PM PST by La Enchiladita (God help us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
I agree. These are game changing times. I am amazed at the number of 401k peddlers still jabbering about "buy & hold."

As the winds change so changes the set of the sails. You'd think everyone would be in cash (market at o?) and only venture in for a bit of speculation from time to time. The market is above 8 because so many clueless people still have equity positions that could very well deteriorate within the year. Why have they not, at least, shifted into cash funds?

102 posted on 02/11/2009 12:03:08 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound

More like the Chinese.


103 posted on 02/11/2009 12:03:57 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound
mega bump 4 l8r

Μολὼν λάβε

104 posted on 02/11/2009 12:06:16 PM PST by wastoute (translation of tag "Come and get them (bastards)")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: geologist
Sounds like America to me. It is a strong possibility.

I've been saying that for over 20 years.

105 posted on 02/11/2009 12:11:52 PM PST by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound

Direct link to this article:

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/02/tight-before-the-election-of-president-hussein-an-electronic-run-on-the-banks.html


106 posted on 02/11/2009 12:12:50 PM PST by faq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

This downturn is hurting them also... bigtime.


107 posted on 02/11/2009 12:13:40 PM PST by antceecee (Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: geo40xyz

I’ve suspected Soros since Day One .. and while we’re invetigating, can we look into all those donations to the Obama campaign?


108 posted on 02/11/2009 12:13:52 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound; sam_paine

Link: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/02/tight-before-the-election-of-president-hussein-an-electronic-run-on-the-banks.html


109 posted on 02/11/2009 12:15:20 PM PST by Born Conservative (Bohicaville: http://bohicaville.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound
This is the scenario that I would like to see happen.

Mr. Jack Bauer meet George Soros ET AL!

110 posted on 02/11/2009 12:19:29 PM PST by longhorn too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

I’ve come to a conclusion after reading the “analysis” by a lot of these buy-n-hold preachers:

They really don’t understand the bigger picture of the economy. They really don’t. They keep pointing to all the recessions we’ve had since WWII, and they completely, utterly are incapable of saying “Yes, something like the Depression could happen again.”

But it was a couple of economists at the NBER who did a study of two dozen recessions/panics caused by finance sector failures who lay out the case for what is ahead of us: Another 15 to 20% down in housing prices, another 20% off in equities, and a 7% increase in unemployment, and at least six years’ recovery time - if we’re going to be smack-on the average.

Nothing we do is ‘average’ — we’re the statistical gorilla in the mist here — all the other nations that have been through large bank failures (including our 1930’s episode) involved far smaller economies, with much less coupling, little if any derivative exposure, etc.

About all I’m doing now are vertical spreads on ETF’s and dividend yielding stocks. I’m long some MLP’s like KMP that won’t go out of business anytime soon, because people in the northeast like to heat with something other than coal or wood.


111 posted on 02/11/2009 12:21:22 PM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
I agree. You get the same old pitch..."the market is up 8% on average over the last 100 years." the problem is, your retirement may fall smack in the middle of a 20 down trend and you lose a good portion of your wealth. The market is cyclical and you need to catch the wave, to use a surfing metaphor. If your life cycle is out of sync with the market cycle, you lose. You would have been better off in CDs.

How may times have you seen "projections" where estate planners, et al use an 8% bench to project the value of a portfolio? A fool and his money are soon parted... Thanks.

112 posted on 02/11/2009 12:32:54 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound

Never happen as the GOP is to disorganized & to spineless to go after the rats in question . That is the greatest failing of the GOP a total lack of fighting spirit & bloodlust.


113 posted on 02/11/2009 12:48:08 PM PST by Nebr FAL owner (.308 reach out & thump someone .50 cal.Browning Machine gun reach out & crush someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

I agree. we are stocking up on essentials to be prepared for martial law when it happens.


114 posted on 02/11/2009 1:18:32 PM PST by okokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: okokie

A Conservative Revolution is on the horizon. One way or another we have to beat down these libs and socialists.


115 posted on 02/11/2009 1:23:18 PM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (You cannot help the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington
Before the election I read that Soros had a lot of money in Lehman. In fact, there was some glee on this site that he had lost a lot of money and would not be able to throw so much money around in the election. So, if it was well-known that Soros was invested in Lehman, but assumed that he was one who lost money, not the one who caused their downfall...is that good cover or what? And why was Lehman allowed to fail when others weren't? Is it so that Lehman wouldn't have to go through the scrutiny of others are going through now?
116 posted on 02/11/2009 1:25:28 PM PST by madinmadtown (BO stinks..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound

bump


117 posted on 02/11/2009 2:32:23 PM PST by Freedom Dignity n Honor (There are permanent moral truths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madinmadtown
Good questions, all. Soros tends to work in the shadows so no body is ever sure what happens to him. As for Lehman, it seems they were the sacrificial goat in all of this. Maybe Fuld acted too quickly. But, he didn't have much time. Payroll is the biggest draw on cash and stiffing his workers because he was out of cash or credit would have been equally a problem. In the end, the workers and the investors lost big time. The Government should have stepped in (now that the floodgates are open. The Bank of England or the British government could have helped also. I saw King's comments this morning where he blamed the UK meltdown on Lehman.
118 posted on 02/11/2009 3:13:28 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick
A Conservative Revolution is on the horizon. One way or another we have to beat down these libs and socialists.

Can't wait! We just have to convince the American Idol voters that they are better off being a conservative than a liberal. How do we do that? Or, after the Great Obama Depression of 2009-2012, maybe they will figure that out for themselves. Liberalism didn't do too well in the 1950's because of the first Great Depression and WW II.

119 posted on 02/11/2009 3:16:37 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: orlop9

Great link. Thanks.


120 posted on 02/11/2009 4:00:02 PM PST by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson