Kate Hudson shines it off at the Bride Wars premiere (A return to Glamorous Hollywood)

The Fashion Time Magazine ^ | Jan 6th, 2009 | The Fashion Time Magazine

[Mister Ghost]

Kate Hudson has started off the New Year in a very stylish fashion. We first noticed her commitment to couture when she made her way to the Ed Sullivan Theater in New York City to do the taping of a segment of the Late Show with David Letterman. She was rocking out in a sexy Emilio Pucci sequined mini dress from the brand’s Spring 2009 collection. Hudson accentuated her look with black opaque tights and Sergio Rossi suede slingback sandals.

[theFIRMbss]

And she gets credit
for not having big tattoos
all over her back . . .

[Perdogg]

related

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2145312/posts

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

To my fashion-challenged eye, that’s still one pretty snazzy outfit, though like some of the fashions of the 60’s/70’s, I suspect it will look absurd in thirty years!

[Tax-chick]

LOL! When my family was at Myrtle Beach last May, a couple was married on the beach about 50 yards from the steps to our porch. Several of the wedding party were wearing backless dresses which displayed large, loud tattoos. My mother and mother-in-law couldn’t believe it.

[mnehring]

She is stunning.. thanks again for adding some aesthetic value to our threads. :->

[jennyjenny]

Tights and sling back sandals? No.

[Perdogg]

[Puppage]

for not having big tattoos

Tramp Stamp ping!

[A_perfect_lady]

The mini dress is pretty, but the breathless way they report the name of the designer always seems kind of ridiculous to me. Oh, the name, the name. Hey, who made the earrings? Who made the tights? Let's find that out too.

Wasn't there a time you noticed the woman, not the designer?

[Le Chien Rouge]

I always thought she was quite attractive but since Almost Famous, her movies have really blown chunks.......

[theFIRMbss]

>
>Los Angeles                       Chicago


Please God, please-please-please,
let me win the lottery,
please-please-please. Amen.

[Tax-chick]

Wasn't there a time you noticed the woman, not the designer?

I think most of the guys are noticing the woman ;-). Nonetheless, the publication is about fashion, so the clothes, the accessories, and their designers are the real subject.

[WackySam]

she gets credit for not having big tattoos

And for not having big fake ta-ta's

[Doohickey]

The look on Anne Hathaway’s face is priceless.

[Lucius Cornelius Sulla]

Somewhat overdressed there.

[Venturer]

Tattoo’s are a great fad, but when the fad runs out, you still have them.

You can always change a dress.

[Philo1962]

I live in suburban Chicago. I need no reminders. On the other hand, spring is one day closer.

[gridlock]

What is up with Anne Hathaway? She is looking not-quite-human these days.

[PennsylvaniaMom]

I love the clothes...and the looknof Tinseltown glamour. Kate Hudson looks great in the top photo...but as pretty as she looks in the white gown pic, I can’t help but think of her as Goldie Version 2.0. She needs her own ‘look.’

And I hafta ask, what’s up w/Hathaway? Did they forget to tell her to dress up? She looks (facially) odd as well. Botoxing that young? A little Rejuvex gone awry?