Phil Berg: "Urgent – Write Letters to Supreme Court Justices"...

ObamaCrimes.com ^

[MelSmith]

Case of Berg vs. Obama, U.S.S.C. Case No. 08-570, in the U.S. Supreme Court has been scheduled for two [2] Conferences [January 9th and 16th, 2009].

The Justices of the Supreme Court will read letters sent to them. Let them know how important it is for them to hear our case; how “standing” is important on the issue of Obama’s qualifications; how we are headed for a “Constitutional crisis” if Obama’s qualifications are not resolved; how important it is to follow “our Constitution;” and how Obama’s records: his original ‘vault’ birth certificate, immigration records when he as Barry Soetoro [adopted in Indonesia] returned to Hawaii in 1971, if any, and any change of name Court records are necessary as Obama might be an illegal alien, not only not qualified to be President, but a fraud as U.S. Senator from Illinois.

Write one [1] letter to the nine Justices of the United States Supreme Court (names are listed below), make nine [9] copies and put them in nine [9] separate envelopes, addressed to each Justice, and then place them into one [1] manila envelope and mail to:

See ObamaCrimes.com for instructions.

[MelSmith]

Read Obama the Fraud for additional information regarding why Obama is concealing his birth documentation from the public.

[kjo]

This is a non-story...the media has largely ignored it, and it looks like the SCOTUS will too.

Too bad...because the guy’s going to be a disaster as POTUS.

[TheConservativeParty]

I snail mailed no fewer than 8 letters about this to Thomas and Souter in December. Impassioned letters, asking them to uphold The Constitution.

I have no faith at all that the SCOTUS will make sure Zero is not Kenyan. None at all.

I say we all give the same regard to laws and rules that the next “president” has shown. He scoffs at The Constitution. I shall continue to revere The Constitution, but I will no longer take seriously that We The People must live by a higher set of laws than the elected elites abide by.

I shall have no president until possibly Jan.20, 2013. If “he” is re-elected, I will have no “president” until Jan.20,2017 - should the Good Lord allow me to live that long.

[Rappini]

Even if it did to go to SCOTUS it would come back 5 to 4 in favor of NOBAMA. They don’t have the cahones to stand up to the Libs Constitution or no Consitution. And wait till you see the new Judges. I wonder if there will be any room on the next Space shot.

[maquiladora]

Berg is a 9/11 conspiracy theorist. Waste of time.

[RC2]

Our country has gone from having the most powerful person in the world lead us, to the least powerful and the least respected person in the world. Great, just great!

[MelSmith]

SCOTUS is not ignoring it: they have two conferences scheduled to discuss Berg v. Obama (on January 9th and 16th). Instead, the story is being ignored by those of us who could make a difference.

[bronxboy]

‘Philip J. Berg, Esquire stated in a letter to the nations throughout the world:’

‘It is time for the nations of the world to come forth and take the leadership because of the failure of the United States Government and the States where crimes were committed on 09/11/01, where no thorough investigation and indictments occurred, to investigate, arrest and prosecute the people responsible for the murders on 9/11/01, specifically including George W. Bush and Richard Cheney.’

Berg continued there is overwhelming evidence that:

“Bush and his cronies made 9/11 happen or let it happen. And, if they let it happen, then they made it happen. Either way, they are responsible; and more important, they have completely and unequivocally covered-it-up!”

I will have nothing to do with this nutter...he is a disgrace. No conservative should mail any letter on behalf of this person.

[bronxboy]

I expect they meet to discuss how to get rid of these lawsuits...no evidence they have ever taken this seriously. With Berg’s record, they shouldn’t.

[hoosiermama]

My letters (9) went out before Christmas in bright red envelopes with urgent written on them.....

Here's a sample in case anyone want to use it as a jumping off point:

---

Supreme Court Justice
United States Supreme Court
1 First Street NE Washington DC 20543
November 14, 2008

Your Honor:

Our Forefather’s in their wisdom established our government in three parts to check and balance each other. They specifically stated the requirements for the office of the president. You have sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States. Unfortunately they did not establish who would vet each candidate to determine eligibility.

Nor did they establish “standing” if such a case were ever to be presented.. Standing , a arbitrary term established for the smooth working of the judiciary system, is not a condition established by the Constitution

Currently there are two different cases waiting your review: 08A407 and 08-4340. There are at least seventeen more in the lower courts hoping to establish verification or establish who is responsible to qualify/disqualify candidates for the office of President. “We The People” are about to be in crisis if you chose to ignore these cases. We the People all have standing.

...personal comments....

The SCOTUS must put this crisis to rest. I am begging you , The Supreme Court of the United States MUST hear all the evidence presented in the case(s). and establish that a precedence for establishing qualification is achieved. A “rule of Law” one way or the other must be decided. The Constitution must remain intact, only qualified persons shall hold the office of the Presidency.

Sincerely,

[SlapHappyPappy]

Honestly, I don’t like the idea of a Supreme Court that allows letters to influence their decisions. They need to make the decisions based on the facts and the law. If the people don’t like the law, they need to work to have it changed. A judiciary that is influenced by public opinion is no different than the activist judges we always complain about.

Additionally, the Berg case uses some of the weakest arguments against Obama’s that are eligibility out there. By pushing this specific case we have actually buried the stronger arguments.

[MelSmith]

The 9/11 truthers movement is irrational and idiotic. However, that has nothing to do with the fact that Obama is refusing to allow his birth certification to be examined by the public, and that the Supreme Court has two conferences scheduled this month to discuss Berg v. Obama.

[hoosiermama]

Names and address to Cut and paste

---

United States Supreme Court
1 First Street NE Washington DC 20543

The Supreme Court Justices are as follows:

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts
Supreme Court Justice John Stevens
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy
Supreme Court Justice David Souter
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Ginsburg
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer
Supreme Court Justice Samual Alito

[mad_as_he$$]

Just a note I believe the correct salutation for a Supreme is “Justice” as in “Dear Justice Souter” etc.

[MelSmith]

If this nation fails, it will not because of the Socialist Democrats, Obama or the corrupt media, it will be because of good people like you who develop elaborate rationales for doing absolutely nothing, instead of fighting to correct the problems. Maybe there are two groups of people which dominate the country now: parasites and lazy excuse makers.

[dascallie]

obama operative, eh?

[SlapHappyPappy]

I never said to do nothing. I actually said we, and the judges, should follow the law and the constitution. Novel concept, huh?

People who think judges should base judgments on public opinion are no better than those who scream when they feel a judge ignores the law. Don’t forget that the majority of Americans voted for Gore. If the Supreme Court based their verdict on what the public wanted Gore would have been President.

[hoosiermama]

My father is a lawyer and says this is one of several correct salutations...You may also check it out in back of the LARGE dictionary....”Your honor” is always appropriate for a judge in person or on paper.

[Diogenesis]

Things that once Mattered to SCOTUS Department

John Jay (December 12, 1745 – May 17, 1829), American revolutionary, and the first Chief Justice of the United States
was so concerned about "natural born" being a PREREQUISITE to being POTUS, that he wrote to
Gen. Washington and underlined this in his letter (see below).

"[T]he people are the sovereign of this country, and consequently that
fellow citizens and joint sovereigns cannot be degraded by appearing
with each other in their own courts to have their controversies determined.
The people have reason to prize and rejoice in such valuable privileges,
and they ought not to forget that nothing but the free course
of constitutional law and government can ensure the continuance
and enjoyment of them."
[John Jay, Chisholm v. Georgia]

Today, SCOTUS 2008 so far regards John Jay and the American public as 'de minimus'.
Apparently at least six of them lied when they swore that they would protect and defend the Constitution.

[mad_as_he$$]

Humm I have always heard that Supremes even at the State level were called Justice. But hey if a lawyer says so I will go with it. I have seen Kalifornia Supremes addressed as Your Honor and Rose Bird would get a funny look on her face but she was weird anyway!!