[MelSmith]

Read Obama the Fraud for additional information regarding why Obama is concealing his birth documentation from the public.

[kjo]

This is a non-story...the media has largely ignored it, and it looks like the SCOTUS will too.

Too bad...because the guy’s going to be a disaster as POTUS.

[TheConservativeParty]

I snail mailed no fewer than 8 letters about this to Thomas and Souter in December. Impassioned letters, asking them to uphold The Constitution.

I have no faith at all that the SCOTUS will make sure Zero is not Kenyan. None at all.

I say we all give the same regard to laws and rules that the next “president” has shown. He scoffs at The Constitution. I shall continue to revere The Constitution, but I will no longer take seriously that We The People must live by a higher set of laws than the elected elites abide by.

I shall have no president until possibly Jan.20, 2013. If “he” is re-elected, I will have no “president” until Jan.20,2017 - should the Good Lord allow me to live that long.

[maquiladora]

Berg is a 9/11 conspiracy theorist. Waste of time.

[hoosiermama]

My letters (9) went out before Christmas in bright red envelopes with urgent written on them.....

Here's a sample in case anyone want to use it as a jumping off point:

---

Supreme Court Justice
United States Supreme Court
1 First Street NE Washington DC 20543
November 14, 2008

Your Honor:

Our Forefather’s in their wisdom established our government in three parts to check and balance each other. They specifically stated the requirements for the office of the president. You have sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States. Unfortunately they did not establish who would vet each candidate to determine eligibility.

Nor did they establish “standing” if such a case were ever to be presented.. Standing , a arbitrary term established for the smooth working of the judiciary system, is not a condition established by the Constitution

Currently there are two different cases waiting your review: 08A407 and 08-4340. There are at least seventeen more in the lower courts hoping to establish verification or establish who is responsible to qualify/disqualify candidates for the office of President. “We The People” are about to be in crisis if you chose to ignore these cases. We the People all have standing.

...personal comments....

The SCOTUS must put this crisis to rest. I am begging you , The Supreme Court of the United States MUST hear all the evidence presented in the case(s). and establish that a precedence for establishing qualification is achieved. A “rule of Law” one way or the other must be decided. The Constitution must remain intact, only qualified persons shall hold the office of the Presidency.

Sincerely,

[SlapHappyPappy]

Honestly, I don’t like the idea of a Supreme Court that allows letters to influence their decisions. They need to make the decisions based on the facts and the law. If the people don’t like the law, they need to work to have it changed. A judiciary that is influenced by public opinion is no different than the activist judges we always complain about.

Additionally, the Berg case uses some of the weakest arguments against Obama’s that are eligibility out there. By pushing this specific case we have actually buried the stronger arguments.

[Diogenesis]

Things that once Mattered to SCOTUS Department

John Jay (December 12, 1745 – May 17, 1829), American revolutionary, and the first Chief Justice of the United States
was so concerned about "natural born" being a PREREQUISITE to being POTUS, that he wrote to
Gen. Washington and underlined this in his letter (see below).

"[T]he people are the sovereign of this country, and consequently that
fellow citizens and joint sovereigns cannot be degraded by appearing
with each other in their own courts to have their controversies determined.
The people have reason to prize and rejoice in such valuable privileges,
and they ought not to forget that nothing but the free course
of constitutional law and government can ensure the continuance
and enjoyment of them."
[John Jay, Chisholm v. Georgia]

Today, SCOTUS 2008 so far regards John Jay and the American public as 'de minimus'.
Apparently at least six of them lied when they swore that they would protect and defend the Constitution.

[The Sons of Liberty]

Unfortunately, I’m afraid that the SCOTUS will follow the path of least resistance and avoid all controversy by looking the other way while a Kenyan usurper takes the office of POTUS.

[Admin Moderator]

In the future, please note:

1). The Activism sidebar is reserved for News/Activism of the FR chapters.
2). Content from this website belongs in Bloggers.

Thanks,

[real_patriotic_american]

I sent in a letter.... BTW, I believe that they will “Conference” over 3 Obama non-citizenship cases on those 2 dates.

http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244