See my post #71 above. You too obviously have no clue what the word "science" means. You guys really ought to go back to school and lean something, so you're not constantly embarrassing yourselves with stupidities.
Virtually all of science is theory, based on evidence. That includes the theory of evolution.
"Creationism" is not a theory, and it's not based on ANY physical evidence. At best, it might be a hypothesis, which can never be proved scientifically.
But in truth, "creationism" is not even a scientific hypothesis. It's just an assertion based on religious or philosophical belief. It's not science.
Personally, I believe that God created the heavens, the earth and all its creatures. Science only tries to explain how He did it.
You don't understand, Joe. Creationism is based upon a lack of evidence. It's the lack of evidence that proves it's true.
Sadly, I have to get on the road now, so I'll miss the rest of this discussion in which all this confusion will be resolved.
“Virtually all of science is theory, based on evidence. That includes the theory of evolution.” ~ BroJoeK
Or to be more precise; theorIES of evolution.
Theories of evolution: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1839540/posts?page=22#22
Age of the earth: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1839540/posts?page=24#24
We creationists understand that we believe it by faith. Evolutionists pretend that they are not doing the same thing. They have no transitionary fossils or concrete proof and need faith to fill in the gaps. It is the religion of Darwinism/science.
Pray for W, America and Our Troops
Please cite me a single “scientific” experiment that has been used to prove (or disprove) the theory of human evolution.