Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massachusetts Decriminalizes Pot
The Patriot Room ^ | January 3, 2009 | Bill Dupray

Posted on 01/03/2009 6:54:45 PM PST by Bill Dupray

Of course they did. It's Massachusetts. The voters passed a ballot initiative that made possession of less than an ounce marijuana a civil violation with no criminal consequences. And since Massachusetts is run by libtards, the law has shockingly caused a whole lot of problems. For starters, the police have given up - they won't even bother to write the ticket.

More . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at patriotroom.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: bluestates; civilfine; decriminalize; dope; legalizemarijuana; libertarians; marijuana; massachusetts; mrleroyrejoices; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-189 next last
To: Bill Dupray
And since Massachusetts is run by libtards

Yeah, and this is one issue where I agree with my fellow libtards on. The Drug War stinks. If you want to stop drugs, secure the damn borders and end taxpayer treatment programs for junkies. But stop using strawman arguments to defend the Drug War which only feeds the law enforcement and prison industries. Let the states legalize and tax marijuana so they won't come begging to the feds for a bailout.

BTW, Mass. recently almost passed an initiative to kill the state income tax and the Libertarian candidate for Senate came in 2nd against Uncle Ted in 2000, so the state still has some patriots left.

41 posted on 01/03/2009 7:32:52 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncommonsense
You're correct...I know of no one ever passing out or overdosing from drinking too much.....(do I really need the sarcasm tag?)
42 posted on 01/03/2009 7:34:27 PM PST by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: All

It’s amazing how far people will go to justify their vices as virtues or “harmless recreation” when they are anything but.


43 posted on 01/03/2009 7:34:34 PM PST by Soul Seeker (Gov. Sarah Palin '08 -- President Sarah Palin '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray
What about the guy who has less than an ounce, which is essentially legal, and is selling it to school kids?

He should be arrested and thrown in prison, no questions asked. However, this is less likely to happen than the current problem of school kids who are already using pot.

44 posted on 01/03/2009 7:34:51 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
I understand the theory of "gateway" drug but I also recognize that possession of an "individual user" amount of a recreational drug is not where I want my police force focused. Holy sheep dip, do we NOT have more pressing issues to address???
45 posted on 01/03/2009 7:36:37 PM PST by DesertSapper (God, Family, Country . . . . . . . . . . and dead terrorists!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray

Conservatives need to get on the right side of issues like this. We need to take a more Libertarian approach.

We should legalize (and tax):
Marijuana and its derivatives
Online gambling
Prostitution

To pretend that we can stop these activities or that somehow we as a nation will morally wake up is lunacy.


46 posted on 01/03/2009 7:37:30 PM PST by Eccl 10:2 (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem - Ps 122:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: Moonman62

“Pot arrests usually come after someone is stopped for breaking some other law.

Usually, but not always. The cities and counties LOVE the “civil forfeiture” aspect of the War on Drugs. It gets them all kinds of cash they couldn’t get otherwise. Here’s the most egregious example:

An eccentric millionaire in Malibu, set up and shot dead for his ranch property-

http://www.saveourguns.com/scott001.htm

Civil forfeiture is a nightmare, and there are more than plenty of examples. A violation of the 4th Amendment in my opinion.


48 posted on 01/03/2009 7:40:39 PM PST by GunsAndBibles (God save Calif. - 'cause it's gonna take a miracle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Carolina_Thor

The example works. Your argument is invalid because marijuana is not legal.


49 posted on 01/03/2009 7:41:35 PM PST by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray

I think ALL drugs should be decrimalized as for possession and use. Put the sellers in jail. I am tired of the crime and murder and the use of such to make our police force a military type force and as a push for gun control. I did not use to feel this way but I have changed my mind. The war on drugs is bad for freedom.


50 posted on 01/03/2009 7:45:56 PM PST by therut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray
What, police departments don't get to buy any more "drug boats" with money they've stolen confiscated through property forfeiture laws?

See this? ----> .

That's the world's smallest violin, playing you a sad song right there.

51 posted on 01/03/2009 7:51:26 PM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Nihil utile nisi quod honestum - Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunsAndBibles; Mojave
Usually, but not always. The cities and counties LOVE the “civil forfeiture” aspect of the War on Drugs. It gets them all kinds of cash they couldn’t get otherwise. Here’s the most egregious example:

An eccentric millionaire in Malibu, set up and shot dead for his ranch property-

http://www.saveourguns.com/scott001.htm

Civil forfeiture is a nightmare, and there are more than plenty of examples. A violation of the 4th Amendment in my opinion.

And people wonder why I don't trust cops anymore.

52 posted on 01/03/2009 7:53:10 PM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Nihil utile nisi quod honestum - Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray

Make fun of Massachusetts politics all you want to, because it has been a serious “mess” for more than five decades and counting. Just also understand that “Massachusetts politics” will officially go national on January 20, 2009, and many things on many issues will get worse all over the entire country because of this fact. I don’t see conservatism making any kind of serious political comeback for, at least, sixty years, if ever, but I seriously do hope that I’m wrong about my prediction. Too many people, just from within the GOP at every political level, are still acting like they don’t fully understand everything that just happened to them on November 4, 2008.


53 posted on 01/03/2009 7:58:41 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore (Conservatives obey the rules. Leftists cheat. Who probably has the political advantage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray

To me, marijuana is less an issue than hemp. Specifically, missing out on a crop that could be worth billions. Grown on marginal land, with a minimum of fertilizer and pesticide, if used for nothing other than paper it would be a godsend.

Not only does it make better paper that lasts far longer than wood pulp paper, but it would slash the price of lumber, which could be put to far better use on other things than chip.

And since hemp will cross pollinate with marijuana, it will slash its potency. It will still be a drug, just not as potent a drug.


54 posted on 01/03/2009 8:09:55 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: death2tyrants

“The example works. Your argument is invalid because marijuana is not legal.”

No... the original point was, it’s not a victimless crime. If it were legal, there wouldn’t be a need to smuggle it. That makes it a bad example.


55 posted on 01/03/2009 8:13:07 PM PST by Carolina_Thor (It's always better to be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rightwingextremist1776

My point was that you don’t know what you’re getting with pot. It could be just stinky, or it could knock you on your ars with 1 hit. Impairment is dangerous if you’re doing anything in public. I personally don’t want my family and me subjected to dangerously impaired people - we already have enough on the streets.


56 posted on 01/03/2009 8:30:05 PM PST by uncommonsense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray; All

Weed is a gateway drug in more ways than one. Many criminal organizations that are into trafficking hard-core dope, got started cultivating or dealing weed. The weed provided them the capital to expand into coke, meth, and junk. This travesty of a law will provide the Mexican drug cartels will even more customers in the United States and will produce even more brutal murders on both sides of the border.


57 posted on 01/03/2009 8:40:42 PM PST by attiladhun2 (Obama is the anti-Reagan, he believes government is the solution, rather than the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray
In California, even though they passed a medical marijuana initiative a few years ago, the feds refused to accept it and the DEA was closing down the "clubs." Let's see what the feds do in Massachusetts.

On the other hand, now everyone in Massachusetts can talk like Caroline Kennedy.

-PJ

58 posted on 01/03/2009 8:46:38 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray

Massachusetts itself is going to pot. They join together what God has placed asunder, and the legislature negates the Constitution if port side political pressures require it.


59 posted on 01/03/2009 8:47:16 PM PST by daniel1212 (I sent unto you all my servants the prophets,... saying, Oh, do not this abominable thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray

DeCriminalize pot, but fire employees who use it.


60 posted on 01/03/2009 8:48:15 PM PST by Obamageddon (Birth certificate and college transcripts will be required for Federal employment, Mr. Soetero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson