Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Letters to Military Associations - File in US Federal Court Regarding Obama's Citizenship
self ^ | 12/3/08 | BP2

Posted on 12/03/2008 12:38:59 PM PST by BP2

CAPT XXXX XXXX, USXX (Ret.)

XXXXX XXXXXXX Association, Washington Office
Washington, DC 20002

XXXX XXXX
XXX XXXXXXX
XXXX, XX XXXXX

Captain XXXXX,

Sir, as a fellow vet, I know you fully understand the obligation we accept when we say the words, “to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.” As citizen soldiers, those words have special meaning to us. Our allegiance rises above party politics, a man or an institution. Our allegiance is to the US Constitution -- that we “defend it against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” To that end, I have a CALL TO ACTION for the XXXXX XXXXXXX Association, action that will not be easy, yet required to ensure the Rule of Law stays intact.

Former US Senator Barack Obama has openly acknowledged that his father was a Kenyan (British) citizen and his mother was an American citizen. At birth in 1961, Barack Obama (Jr) was a dual-citizen – he has confirmed this fact himself. When Barack Obama, Jr, was born in Hawaii, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama, Sr was a British Citizen, whose status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr‘s children.


As outlined in the British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): “Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.”

As a result, Barack Obama, Jr, IS a US citizen, but he is NOT a Natural Born Citizen as required by Article 2, Sect 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution. Note that the US Constitution outlines that Senators and Representative are required to be US Citizens to hold office. However, the office of President has the unique requirement of Natural Born Citizen. That prerequisite was specifically outlined by the Framers, hearkened by John Jay, the first Chief Justice, to ensure that our Commander in Chief would have “undivided loyalties” to uphold our nation’s interest.


It is unfortunate that the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission allowed this to happen, i.e., not vetting the qualifications of Candidate Barack Obama for the National Election. We are on the precipice of a Constitutional Crisis. Numerous lawsuits are docketed in the US Supreme Court at this time, including a closed-door Conference that has received little press coverage, DONOFRIO V. WELLS, docket# 08A407, which takes place Friday, December 5. Many other cases are coming from different venues, disputing Barack Obama’s birth records to lawsuits challenging various Secretaries of States for their Certification process. Donofrio’s case is unique and directly challenges Barack Obama’s former British citizenship. However, nothing is for sure in the courtroom, and the clock is ticking until judgment is rendered.

Those who wear the uniform are in a unique position. We are UNDER OATH to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States.” We are the last line of defense against our enemies, and we put ourselves directly in harm’s ways at the direction of the Commander in Chief. While serving our nation, although we may not believe in the politics of the President, we follow his directions.


However, under UCMJ, we are to follow all LEGAL orders of our Commanding Officer. I dare say that if an illegitimate CINC holds office, our military may have some significant disorder following Barack Obama’s Inauguration on January 20. The potential of a breakdown in the military Chain of Command should shivers down the spine of any American, certainly those who understand how vulnerable it would make us to our enemies.

Many cases have been swept aside by lower courts for “lack of standing.” Military personnel actually do have the right, and duty, to request verification if there is doubt that the Commander in Chief does not meet Constitutional requirements to hold office. Such “questioning” is not governed by UCMJ Article 88 (Contempt toward Officials), DoD DIRECTIVE 1344.10 (Political Activities by Members of the Armed Forces on Active Duty), or any other UCMJ Article or Directive I can find.

Captain XXXXX, I ask that you consult with attorneys in your network and ask them to review this – I think you’ll be surprised by their response. IT IS VITAL, SIR, THAT YOU UNDERSTAND: There IS a difference between a Citizen, and Natural Born Citizen  -- even if you are born on US Soil, especially if only ONE of your parents is an American Citizen. If you check online, you’ll find that many Constitutional lawyers are looking at this and agree we are headed toward a Constitutional crisis in the next few weeks. Unfortunately, it may fall on those of us are affected by this the most, the nation’s military, to keep this from happening.


Because military personnel are bound to the US Constitution by oath, it is believed by many of who are watching this situation that US Active Duty and Reservist have the legal standing to file lawsuits directly in the US Federal Court system. In doing so, these groups of Active Duty and/or Reservists can “fast track” this issue directly to the US Supreme Court to “Stay” the Electoral College vote that is to take place on December 15. Barack Obama is NOT President-Elect officially until the Electoral College meets and declares him so.

The Objective of these lawsuits is to have the US Supreme Court, or a significant portion of states’ Electoral College officials, investigate this further before Electoral College delegates from each state cast their votes on December 15. The 22nd Amendment would permit President George Bush to remain CINC until this issue is resolved.

Please note that AFTER the Electoral College votes on December 15, Congress would then certify the EC votes. Unfortunately, there is little reason to believe Congress has the “intestinal fortitude” to evaluate this properly before January 20 – they have NOT up to this point.


Sir, I know this is a sensitive situation, not lightly undertaken. It flirts with unconscionable topics like “political activity,” “chain of command,” and other deemed scandalous by opponents. However, overriding such concerns must be the issues of the “Rule of Law,” and specifically to us as military leaders, the “US Uniformed Services Oath of Office.”

It is neither unpatriotic nor insubordinate to ask of our civilian authorities: “If Barack Obama’s father was a British Citizen at the time of Barack Obama’s birth, is Barack Obama a “Natural Born Citizen” as the Constitution requires for the office of President?”

It will not be up to the US Military to decide the road for us ahead. However, if we don’t act IMMEDIATELY, I fear the officials who have the power to have the ability to stop this probable infraction of the US Constitution will not exercise the political courage to act.


COURAGE is a quality of which those in the US Military possess in abundance. NOW is the time to exercise that courage.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at XXX-XXX-XXXX.

Respectfully,




TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: bho2008; birthcertificate; certifigate; military; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamatruthfile; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: STARWISE

I see. Well, if the report is true,it is encouraging that someone in Washington gets it. Thanks.


61 posted on 12/04/2008 5:25:45 AM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: BP2

“calvary” = cavalry


62 posted on 12/04/2008 6:41:04 AM PST by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chief Engineer

Ah - I remember reading that recently; a customs official (or something like that), now retired, said he was (again IIRC) to testify that Obama used a foriegn passport upon enterting the country. I think he may be connected to one of the suits.

GOsh, I wish I could remember details.


63 posted on 12/04/2008 8:14:23 AM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

LOL I have had years of practice and a love of reading that helps me out in that regard, just don’t ask me someone’s name if they introduce themself to me and then leave(unless I write it down!)


64 posted on 12/04/2008 11:15:48 AM PST by Chief Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

bfl


65 posted on 12/04/2008 5:41:42 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma ( PRAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17; proudofthesouth; river rat; Duck Fan; sushiman; nobama08; MainFrame65; ...
- ping -

As I understand it, the Letter campaign is going well, even going to VFWs & similar groups and getting a positive response. At first it was seen as divisive, but now folks see it as a last line to uphold Checks and Balances within the Executive Branch if the other 2 branches are unwilling or unable to act.

There IS a high level of interest particularly among a some groups of Reservists in the western states who are watching the court cases, trying to decide how and when to act ...

Please modify and mail out to people who might be able and willing to act.

66 posted on 12/07/2008 12:37:21 AM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BP2; Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; ...

Thank you, BP2.

Ping; perhaps we can help BP2 with a Letter campaign.

Thanks in advance.


67 posted on 12/07/2008 9:00:03 AM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Also one point I thought of ... right now he’s NOT CIC, not even President-Elect .. until the electoral college meets and votes and then the Senate certifies him as the ‘winner.’

He’s not even senator ... just Mr. Obama, civilian.


Actually, we're not sure he's Obama either.
68 posted on 12/07/2008 9:17:57 AM PST by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

Do retired regular army Captains have any standing?


69 posted on 12/07/2008 10:03:33 AM PST by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BP2

I am hopeful that Leo or someone can get the SCOTUS Justices to see this case as a power grab by the Legislative and Executive (to be) branches of govt.

Obama/DNC & McCain/RINO side of the GOP got the legislative (sec of states) to rubberstamp their eligibility. I think McCain was Soros Plan B in case Plan A lost. Watching McCain/Lindsay Graham/Crist/Arnuld suck up to Obama post election is s sickening.


70 posted on 12/07/2008 10:34:01 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: jacquej

I think if you are still subject to recall you should. Consult 10 USC 688. At age 60, you are no longer subject to recall.


71 posted on 12/07/2008 11:25:35 AM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Thanks for all you do, LucyT

God Bless the Military Ping.


72 posted on 12/07/2008 6:28:47 PM PST by Iowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: BP2

present


73 posted on 12/08/2008 9:57:56 AM PST by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; LucyT; BonRad; ckilmer; hoosiermama; Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; ...
BTTT


74 posted on 12/18/2008 2:16:27 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie; justiceseeker93

Note: this topic is from December 3, 2008. Thanks BP2.
75 posted on 02/23/2010 2:25:13 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson