Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama ran campaign while ineligible to run for Presidency
nobarack08 ^ | November 26, 2008 | nobarack08

Posted on 11/30/2008 10:57:51 PM PST by ckilmer

Obama ran campaign while ineligible to run for Presidency

Posted on November 26, 2008 by nobarack08

Obama, asked if he was going to run for the Presidency in 2008, stated that he’d have to start running from day one, when elected into the Senate. He lied, He did.

He must have known then that he was ineligible to serve as President.

Then after the fact [after he was WAS running], the resolution was adopted. Therefore Obama with prior knowledge of his dual citizenship status, foreign adoption, etc. was a fraud.

Obama should NEVER have been permitted to run in the first place.

S. Res. 511, introduced on April 10, 2008 by Senator Claire McCaskill and co-sponsored by Senators Leahy, Obama, Hillary Clinton, Tom Coburn and Jim Webb, reported out of the Senate Judiciary Committee by Senator Leahy, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, without amendment and by unanimous vote of the Committee, S. Res. 511 expressed the “sense of the Senate,” confirming that Senator McCain, who was born in the Panama Canal Zone to parents who were both U.S. citizens, McCain’s father in the U.S. military and the McCain family living and on a U.S. military base, was, indeed, a “natural born” U.S. citizen and, thus, eligible to run for President and, if elected, to be President (http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200804/041008c.html). The resolution was adopted in the Senate by unanimous consent on April 30, 2008 (http://tinyurl.com/49xaxe).

You should be able to smell a rat when you consider how nice the irascible Leahy was, and the smell of that rat got a lot stronger when I ran across commentary (see http://tinyurl.com/3uz4ex) that Obama, usually a no show and out campaigning, was in attendance and had a hand in crafting the specific language in this resolution, in particular, McCaskill and Obama added what some Senators thought was the unnecessary phrase,

“Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President;” (see http://tinyurl.com/3uz4ex)
Meaning that the ineligibility to run, means he was not qualified to run in the primaries and since the resolution was accepted after a number of primaries were already done, he should have been disqualified and removed from the ballots and the delegates given to the other candidates or the primaries re-run.
The issue of Florida and Michigan would have never happened and the DNC would have not been able to allow him to run.
In summary, Obama would never had the delegates or superdelegates nor the ability to have the nomination.

Just like Obama’s admission to holding citizenship from a foreign country at birth, disqualifies him. 

From Obama own website:

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor
sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship
automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”

Question?
How could it expire, if he never had it?


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 11/30/2008 10:57:51 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

bump & bookmark.


2 posted on 11/30/2008 11:01:28 PM PST by CaribouCrossing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Attention must be paid.


3 posted on 11/30/2008 11:04:41 PM PST by thesetruths
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I wonder what happens if its shown he is ineligible for Presidency, and rather than stepping down he engages a long drawn out legal battle.


4 posted on 11/30/2008 11:09:28 PM PST by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaribouCrossing

Any Politician, Citizen, or Judge who allows Him to remain and occupy the White House, is a traitor.


5 posted on 11/30/2008 11:11:03 PM PST by LtKerst (Lt Kerst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LtKerst

The list of accessories to the crime grows every day.


6 posted on 11/30/2008 11:18:16 PM PST by hsrazorback1 (To get what you had, do what you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Is this just something that will continually be defeated on a technicality? I saw Berg’s lawsuit was dismissed because he “didn’t have standing” or something like that. If every judge in the US decides to sidestep these cases, what can be done? We may be screwed. Most lefties don’t care about the constitution when it becomes inconvenient for them. That’s why we have some imaginary right-to-privacy that thrusts abortion on demand on all of us. If that shiite can be pushed on us, how hard is it to believe the judiciary wont screw with the constitution and the public again?


7 posted on 11/30/2008 11:23:23 PM PST by MovementConservative (In 4 years GW Bush and the free-spending republicans have almost completely destroyed the GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MovementConservative

Berg’s case was badly formed.

The other cases are not making the same mistake.

They may be rejected but likely not on form.


8 posted on 11/30/2008 11:28:34 PM PST by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

QUIZ: Who said the following?

“Senator McCain has earned the right to be his party’s nominee and no legal loophole should prevent him from competing in the campaign.”

ANSWER:Obama as quoted by the WashingtonPost.com in an article posted on March 1st 2008.

Strangely, the article was titled “Obama Backs Law That Aids McCain”. Somehow I think it was really a case of Obama backing a law that aided himself.


9 posted on 11/30/2008 11:45:13 PM PST by dianed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
How could it expire, if he never had it?

The author needs to do more homework...even basic research on the topic would reveal the irrelevance of this question. Nobody denies he had the Kenyan citizenship, which was conferred upon him upon Kenyan independence (based on his father's Kenyan birth.

In fact, the site explains it clearly: “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children. "

See Chapter VI, Section 87 (and related) of the Constitution of Kenya.

10 posted on 11/30/2008 11:46:44 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
How could it expire, if he never had it?

The author needs to do more homework...even basic research on the topic would reveal the irrelevance of this question. Nobody denies he had the Kenyan citizenship, which was conferred upon him upon Kenyan independence (based on his father's Kenyan birth.

In fact, the site explains it clearly: “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children. "

See Chapter VI, Section 87 (and related) of the Constitution of Kenya.

11 posted on 11/30/2008 11:46:44 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

12 posted on 11/30/2008 11:48:14 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

So you reckon that the reason obama was able to go to pakistan in 1982 is that he went on a kenyan passport?


13 posted on 11/30/2008 11:52:47 PM PST by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1
I wonder what happens if its shown he is ineligible for Presidency, and rather than stepping down he engages a long drawn out legal battle.

On Jan. 20th 2009 Dick Cheney would be sworn in as acting President until the legal mess is settled. This could happen even if it gets settled, but doesn't allow sufficent time for transition, or for the remedy prescribed by the courts to be carried out.

14 posted on 12/01/2008 12:02:59 AM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1

Joe Biden becomes the president! Then Joe will pardon him for breaking the law!


15 posted on 12/01/2008 12:05:17 AM PST by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

he defrauded tha nation. he is a liar.


16 posted on 12/01/2008 12:07:27 AM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
On Jan. 20th 2009 Dick Cheney would be sworn in as acting President until the legal mess is settled...

No, that would not happen.

Instead, you would have a President Pelosi.

17 posted on 12/01/2008 12:37:47 AM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou; ckilmer; valkyry1
No, Biden would become acting President.

Amendment 20 of the U.S. Constitution (Ratified 1/23/1933):

3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.  

18 posted on 12/01/2008 1:11:49 AM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

This is too important an issue for questions like this.

See British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.

There is no dispute that Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya and therefore a citizen of the U.K.

The more interesting question is what country issued the passport Obama used to visit Pakistan while he was in college, sometime around 1981?


19 posted on 12/01/2008 1:25:35 AM PST by Ahithophel (Padron@Anniversario)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Actually, this can be determined by the Courts. This is a major Constitutional issue and just like the line item veto, the Justices slapped that piece of legislation down. The Constitution can be changed but only through the amendment process.

We’ve got to get people educated on these Constutional matters. People have elected men/women to work for them who are usurping the Constitution. Moreover, the media is helping them to get away with this insanity.


20 posted on 12/01/2008 1:51:48 AM PST by Paige ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing," Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson