REPUBLICANS CONTROL THIS (AND EVERY) ELECTION

10/27/2008 | self

[Mr. K]

A lot is often said about how Voter Turnout affects the election. But few people actually grasp what that means to US AS REPUBLICANS.

It is as simple as this- In EVERY election, Democrap turnout is relatively constant.

So, it is the increase or decrease in Republican turnout that CONTROLS every election.

Forget the polls, they are designed to drive down Republican turnout FOR THIS REASON.

[Mr. K]

I post too many vanities, I know it.. but this one struck me like a thunderbolt.

I originally saw the data posted HERE on Fr and the figures all added up.

Dems always get the same turnout. So if you VOTE and get ONE MORE PERSON to vote- WE CONTROL THE OUTCOME!!!!

[Parley Baer]

Said many times but we must get out and vote.

[deport]

It is as simple as this- In EVERY election, Democrap turnout is relatively constant.

---

But will that be the case in this election? I suspect the democratic turnout will be some higher than normal thus the GOP turnout needs to be increased. We’ll see in a few days...

[Mr. K]

From the data I saw (if I remember correctly) the democrap turnout is always constant- no matter the variable or energy, because they are pretty much saturated in terms of getting out the vote of people willing to go vote.

So when republican turnout is lower than normal we lose, higher- we win.

SO GET EVERYONE YOU KNOW TO VOTE! DRIVE A FRIEND

oh and Don’t forget there is FREE-FOR-ALL voting in Ohio this year so vote early and vote often~!! if you live close to the border (hint: say you are registering as a democrat to ease the process)

[rom]

And remember folks, the 8 years of Clinton were an anomaly given to us by Ross Perot.

Republicans since Reagan win elections if we GOTV. So, go Vote! Democrats will be busing in every hard luck case they can match up with a voter registration card.

As long as the Americans that make America work get to vote, we will WIN.

[deport]

because they are pretty much saturated in terms of getting out the vote of people willing to go vote.

---

I understand that but my point is I believe they have gotten a larger infusion of new registrants this cycle thus they may have the opp to get a larger turn out. As I said we’ll soon see.

[petercooper]

If I remember correctly— in 2006 there were 18-20 House seats going Dem by less than 5000 votes. That’s when we had FOLEY FOLEY FOLEY and a few other corrupt R’s on the news 24/7 depressing R turnout. Enthusiasm is 10x stronger on the R side this time.

[Regulator]

Aside from pointing out that we shouldn't be turning over Western Civilization to the Mambo Messiah and his Mau-Mau Militias, Mr. McCain could do one tiny thing to energize a base that views him as a turncoat.....come out, say "you know, it doesn't make sense to give citizenship to people who don't deserve it; maybe I was wrong last year..."....and leave it at that.

Little things, ya know?

The message will get across.

[ozzymandus]

This is one reason the RATS place so much time and money on vote fraud. They have managed to steal many, many elections, and when they lose a close one, they blame the Republicans of cheating to cover their tracks.

[Mr. K]

Ross Perot affected republican votes greatly, so I think the theory still holds.

Bush (the elder) saying ‘read my lips’ then signing into law the largest tax increase in history didn’t help himself much either.

[anoldafvet]

Thank you for repeating what I have been saying for weeks:

WE ALREADY HAVE THE VOTES FOR A LANDSLIDE, WE JUST HAVE TO BE SURE WE GET THEM TO THE POLLS.

[Mr. K]

No only that, but they know this information better than I do.

They know they are saturated and the only way to get more votes is to MAKE them.

So we have to get our side motivated AND WATCH THE POLLS>

ANd once we win GET SOME DAMM REFORM IN THE VOTE AND REGISTRATION PROCESS