Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oregon City Ordinance to Ban Criminals from Downtown
AZCONSERVATIVE ^ | 26 July 2008 | John Semmens

Posted on 07/28/2008 4:33:56 PM PDT by John Semmens

Distressed at criminals’ preferences for committing their offenses in the downtown sector of the city, Eugene, Oregon city officials are poised to enact an ordinance aimed at excluding these felons from of the downtown area for up to one year.

Under the proposed law, persons charged with a crime such as robbery or assault would be barred from entering downtown Eugene for 90 days. Convicted criminals will not be allowed downtown for one year.

The proposal is the brainchild of city council members Andrea Ortiz and Mike Clark. “The outer fringes of the community are not bearing their fair share of the burdens of crime,” Ortiz complained. “By this ordinance we’re sending a message to the criminals that they should take their business elsewhere.”

The idea has drawn mixed reactions. Eugene’s Chief of Police Robert Lehner supports the measure. “Our force is stretched pretty thin,” Lehner explained. “If this ordinance can shift some of the crime outside the city limits it will take off some of the pressure.”

Eugene resident, Lucius Sage, labeled the plan “idiotic.” “If a man is willing to risk prison to commit a robbery, I don’t think a rinky-dink ordinance is likely to persuade him to pass up the opportunity,” Sage said. “As an alternative, how about putting the bad guys in jail?”

The American Civil Liberties Union has come out against the ordinance. “It’s discriminatory and limits the career choices of the underprivileged members of society,” said ACLU spokesman, Bertram Petty.

(Excerpt) Read more at azconservative.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Humor; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: careers; crime; neighborhoods; satire

1 posted on 07/28/2008 4:33:56 PM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Satire — right?


2 posted on 07/28/2008 4:47:59 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Some years ago, it is believed that Chicago, East St. Louis and Gary, In. passed similar ordinances.

Or, so it would seem, here in Minneapolis....

;-)


3 posted on 07/28/2008 4:48:32 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Tracking The "Flyin' Imams" Since 11/20/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
Don't take care of your own troubles as lock the bums up foist them off on someone else, REALLY SHOWS SOME INTELLEGENCE.!!!!!!!!!!!
4 posted on 07/28/2008 4:49:24 PM PDT by snowman1 (SHAMNESTY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Sounds amazingly unconstitutional.


5 posted on 07/28/2008 5:33:52 PM PDT by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac
Since when can you do this with people 'charged'? Did they write innocent until proven guilty out of the Constitution while I wasn't looking?

Convicted, you might have a leg to stand on, but, you better be willing to provide city/county/state services out of the forbidden area, too.

6 posted on 07/28/2008 5:40:40 PM PDT by mavfin (Personal freedom, personal responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

DAD GUM IT!!!

I swore to myself I’d never let you fish me in again, and here I went and did it anyway.

:-)


7 posted on 07/28/2008 7:24:08 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (I've left Cynical City... bound for Jaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson