Posted on 06/28/2008 4:25:45 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
Here is hard, irrefutable proof that the Obama campaign is engaged in a huge deceit related to what they are claiming is a copy of his birth certificate.
Notice on Obama's official site, his birth certificate says OHBM 1.1 in the lower left corner.
The original document displayed on the Daily KOS website says OHSM 1.1 in the lower left corner.
The million dollar question is: If the Daily KOS document was supplied by a Obama campaign staffer, as was reported, then how on earth can these two documents differ?
There may be a Hawaiian state agency or department with the initials 'OHBM', but I'm not aware of any.
The agency that you request a copy of a birth certificate from is the 'Office of Health Status Monitoring', OHSM.
The genie is out of the bottle now and it's impossible to "take back" the images. They are immortalized all over the web on different sites. Anyone can see this hard proof of skullduggery for themselves.
Note: Those who keep saying this is a distraction are missing a huge point here. It directly takes aim at Obama and his credibility. A bald-faced lie has been perpetrated on the American public. As far as this issue relates to Obama being a natural born citizen, I make no claims. But there sure has to be some reason for the deceit. Who knows where the trail will lead…
See #17.
...a note from your mommy ain’t gonna cut it.
LOL! So which is it?
Hmmmm.......
They’re both “S”s, man.
OMG! I share Barry’s birthday!
This is retarded. The one from Obama’s site is also an “S”. It just has some pixelation problems from being shrunk. I can plaining see it is an “S” though.
Hate Obama, but think this post is just ignorant.
Yeah. It’s still “OHSM”, but the JPEG compression pushing it down to the smaller size has somehow blurred it into looking a lot like a “B” (and badly kerned it together with the “M”).
}:-)4
...make that “plainly see”...
Having trouble typing.
We can add that to the list of what’s odd about the BC of BHO...which I have now named Certigate.
I just saved it on my computer and blew the image up and it sure looks like a B when it’s blown up.
I worked for Xerox from the early 1980's to the mid-1980's. Xerox had the first laser printers, and they were in use from the late 1970's if I recall correctly. They were massive beasts that typically were hooked up to mainframes (or VAXen) style computers - not PCs. Laser printers were only invented (by Xerox) in 1969, ad were not in any sort of general production until the late 1970's.
Drop it. Now
LOL.
both show an S, now back to the Reds/Indians game already in progress.
LOL So does my mother.
But it's not. It's an "S." How can we tell? Use the "S" in the word "LASER" below for comparison. The "S" in "Laser" looks like a "B" (or even the number 8) too, but it's not. They're both "S's," IMO.
However, the O and H are touching either, as are the S and M, but not the H and S. Wonder why that is?
Nice post in #17 to show OHBM vs OHSM.
The DailyKos version of the Obama BC is what I studied...
There is 2 fold creases in the DailyKos cert. The top one is pointed out in this copy of the Dailykos photo. Use it as a guide to find the crease on the DailyKos version. The top one can be seen fairly well if you look for it in DailyKos version
http://images.dailykos.com/images/user/3/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg (original from Dailykos)
Picture shows where the 1st crease is located...
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y84/patchworkpiecer/BO_Birth_Certificate_foldcrease.jpg (now go back to the DailyKos BC on thier site and look again)
The second crease is very hard to see... You need to save the dailykos version of the BC on your computer and zoom in on the area just above Obama’s fathers name. The crease shows up more in the BC border just to the left and just above Obama’s father’s name. (the rest of the crease is in the first “horizontal” green hatch mark above Obama’s father’s name) - It is very faint but it is there.
http://images.dailykos.com/images/user/3/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg
The next thing is part of the seal can be seen above the Jun 6 2007 date...
You can see darker ripple marks in the green hatch marks. The green hatch marks above the Jun 6 2007 seems to be broke up and you can make out a partial circle pattern in the break up of the green hatch marks.
These photos are upclose cropped pictures of the dailykos version of the BC.
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y84/patchworkpiecer/ob_imprint.jpg
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y84/patchworkpiecer/ob_imprint2.jpg (this one points out were SOME of the ripple marks are on the green hatch marks. Simply put it is a light embossed seal. Pay attention to how broke up looking the green hatches look above the Jun 6 2007 date and how complete they look outside this area.)
Here it is unmarked in B&W
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y84/patchworkpiecer/ob_imprint3.jpg
So which is it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
