Posted on 02/26/2008 7:28:16 PM PST by george76
Coming soon in a Clinton email...
Meanwhile... The media insisted that Obama was not wearing Muslim clothing in the last Clinton email.
But, lookie here:
(Excerpt) Read more at gatewaypundit.blogspot.com ...
The pictures of Barry Hussein Obama are reminders to the voters of Barry’s dubious background. Dressing like the enemy is never a good idea: It’s a HORRIBLE idea when you share a common background WITH the enemy!
During this war, this outfit is as damning as German in a Nazi outfit during WWII.
Post #35
Real or Photoshop?
Real : No flag on his lapel, etc.
Photoshop : My guess with the flag.
But not Photoshoped by me...someone else perhaps.
The pictures, in and of themselves, say nothing and prove nothing. So he dressed like a Kenyan while in Kenya — so what?
More damning than anything else, I think, is his 64-page “Blueprint for Change.” That alone, taking even his questionable background out of the equation, is more than enough to cause worry.
IN 52 SECS WHY BARACK OBAMA CANNOT WIN A GENERAL ELECTION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl32Y7wDVDs
Seen it. It’s good.
No.
The robe was tailored just for him. It seems to have a large neck to clear his ears as he puts it on.
Taliban Micky
oldie but goodie
Strange as it might seem Burack Hussein Obama can't be found wearing any other Native garb other then Muslim attire and even refuses to wear the Native Garb of a United States Senator.
God only knows that doing so would offend his faithful.
It is typical of the type of head wear commonly worn by Christians in those lands where Muslims once ruled.
It shouldn't be hard to do, President Bush in Russia would be a place to start, or a summit in Mongolia might be another.
Well, your post just proves my point once again.
The point is that this picture of Obama is circulated around with no context attached. The people that leaked the picture, whoever they may be, either from Clinton’s camp or Obama’s itself — simply leaked the picture itself, as if a picture of him in a turban is supposed to insinuate or even prove something on its own.
My “so what” was in response to that tactic. The picture of Obama — and for that matter, pictures of the Bushes — in and of themselves, say nothing and prove nothing. (Which, by the way, I simply pulled from Google Images; the source is irrelevant and honestly I didn’t even notice as I was copying/pasting URLS that one of them was from Huffington Post, but I could have pulled it from a hundred other locations on the Net so this is completely irrelevant.)
So I don’t put much creedence in these sorts of tactics, and the way some FReepers make pics such as this into a big deal just plays into what Clinton’s camp wanted (if their camp actually did leak the pic to Drudge).
Far, far more scary in my opinion, as I said, are simply Obama’s ideas for change and his socialist mindset.
No, it’s a hajib.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.