Excellent and very detailed explanation of the sun's effect on Earth's climate, but easily read and understood by the layman. And the star players in this fraud are exposed and skewered as they well deserve to be. It's a must read for global warming truth seekers.
1 posted on
02/22/2008 8:39:15 PM PST by
CedarDave
To: CedarDave
Sleeping like a baby:
SOHO sunspot scan, 2-18-2008. Scientists have been waiting almost a year for solar cycle 24 to begin. A blip in August 2006 and a blip in January 2008 raised hopes, but all remains quiet.
2 posted on
02/22/2008 8:40:37 PM PST by
CedarDave
(John, Conservatives are your only friends now and you haven’t sent us a Christmas card lately)
To: Inyo-Mono
4 posted on
02/22/2008 8:44:20 PM PST by
Inyo-Mono
(If you don't want people to get your goat, don't tell them where it's tied.)
To: CedarDave
6 posted on
02/22/2008 9:07:38 PM PST by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
To: CedarDave
The c*** s****** socialists will lie about anything that will help neuter the USA.
9 posted on
02/22/2008 9:35:16 PM PST by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: CedarDave
So the global warming folks lied. Wow. What a surprise </sarc>
10 posted on
02/22/2008 10:13:07 PM PST by
TBP
To: CedarDave
NEWSWEEK: AL GORE NOW WORTH MORE THAN $100 MILLION
[Since 2000, according to published reports, the former veep has transformed himself from a public servant with around $1 million in the bank to a sparkling private consultant with a net worth estimated to be north of $100 million. Hes a senior adviser to Google, a board member at Apple and now a newly minted general partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, the Silicon Valley venture-capital firm that made billions investing early in Netscape, Amazon and Google. . .If Gores profit-sharing deal is anything like the firms other 23 partners, hes also in line to collect tens of millions of dollars a year. Thats because partners carve up 30 percent of the profits if and when the alternative-energy start-ups that KP supports go public or are sold. . .]
http://www.newsweek.com/id/71011
11 posted on
02/22/2008 10:21:11 PM PST by
Brad from Tennessee
("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
To: CedarDave
"Blaming late 20th century warming on fossil fuel burning was just an opportunity for these religionists to try to impose restrictions on economic activity, and in that way save the planet from human encroachment." Close, but keep in mind that they *exempted* China and India from Kyoto Global Warming Protocols.
Thus, their goal was not to limit human encroachment or economic activity, but rather to limit *Western* economic activity.
12 posted on
02/22/2008 10:21:49 PM PST by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: CedarDave
I have to wonder if the warming we’ve seen recently isn’t Mother Nature (God!) just getting the Earth ready for the cooling that was sure to follow if history is any indication. Natural systems abhor change and will resist it through whatever means available.
We’ve been had, again. We’ve been had in the past, Alar in the apples, and we’ll be had again. It’s our nature.
Depending on how serious the next cooling period is, it could well be that we’ll be most thankful for extra greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere and the heat they kept here on Earth to help ease the cooling.
13 posted on
02/22/2008 11:40:03 PM PST by
jwparkerjr
(Sigh . . .)
To: CedarDave; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...
14 posted on
02/23/2008 5:06:10 AM PST by
xcamel
(Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
To: CedarDave
Cooler temps?
That sinks it. I’m seriously looking at Costa Rica now.
15 posted on
02/23/2008 5:08:13 AM PST by
ovrtaxt
(Member of the irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.)
To: CedarDave
Either way, substantial cooling or socialist control of energy, we are in trouble. We should know quite a bit by November, the new cycle will either have turned up by then or not. Also we will know which of the three global warmists will be the next president. I am hoping (and voting) for the lesser evil. The two dems are hard core socialists who will commit to federal control of energy. With McCain at least there’s a chance he will have a few sane people around him.
17 posted on
02/23/2008 5:28:27 AM PST by
palmer
To: CedarDave
An excellent synopsis that I will share with many of my friends and family.
20 posted on
02/23/2008 8:27:28 AM PST by
Thickman
(Term limits are the answer.)
To: CedarDave; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
21 posted on
02/23/2008 10:14:30 AM PST by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Cloverfield 2008! Why vote for a lesser monster?)
To: CedarDave
TRiple Bump
Excellent Article
30 posted on
02/23/2008 3:41:59 PM PST by
qam1
(There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
To: CedarDave
“Economic restrictions would already be fixed in place, under UN bodies that the religionists control.”
Until someone shoots them.
32 posted on
02/23/2008 8:24:08 PM PST by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: CedarDave
So why will need to do the same things to stop the earth from cooling?
33 posted on
02/23/2008 8:28:18 PM PST by
ThomasThomas
( John McCain a true BLUE conservative)
To: CedarDave
Bump for a great post.
38 posted on
02/25/2008 8:46:56 AM PST by
Ditto
(Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson