Posted on 11/29/2007 9:26:18 AM PST by nsmart
I’m no fan of Ron Paul but I do agree that McCain managed to wiggle out of answering the question that was asked.
Full disclosure: I am not a McCain supporter and I think he would be a disastrous nominee.
Ron Paul...favorite Republican Presidential candidate of the ultra-liberals at The Nation. I’m not surprised.
}:-)4
There is no significant support for Ron Paul. The volume of the screech doesn’t tell you how many birds there are, just the decible level......
Stacked voting by Ron Paul supporters.
Romney: Very greasy
Paul: I know him to be an utter kook, but I was impressed with his demeanor and carriage. That said:
I’m very fond of the bill of rights. My personal liberty must be respected. I would vote for anyone who would promise to honor the bill of rights completely. In this election, its Ron Paul.
Paul calls Kucinich veep speculation "premature" [will think about it in 3 or 4 months]
What other Conservative or GOP candidate would think consideration of splitting the ticket with Kucinich is PREMATURE and not out of the question?
Show a little self respect and find another candidate!
I wonder if McCain has never heard about the Treaty of Versailles and its effect on setting the stage for WW2... How else could he, with a straight face, call that period of international Wilsonian interventionism “isolationism”
Its like I have to watch the Republican candidates stand there and try to be more like Woodrow Wilson than the last one.
Not sure what debate they were watching but I thought McCain (who I can’t stand) cleaned Pauls clock. Sure there were some loud planted nuts in the audience cheering Paul, but McCain made good points that got even louder applause.
There. All fixed now.
The Bill of Rights and my personal liberty means a lot to me. I’d like to pass it on to my children and grandchildren. the growing police state including the federalies reach down all the way to local police is chilling. Government ‘protection’ of its citizens by taking away just a little chunk of liberty here and there, never turns out very well. The military is for defense, not offense and a declaration of war by congress is required by the Constitution.
But McCain was wrong on water boarding.
You have no rights under islamic-fascism.
Remember RP doesn’t thinks its an issue or one that can be solved by submarines.
If you're fond of the Bill of Rights, then you have even less excuse for:
(1) Adopting the analysis of a magazine that opposes the Bill of Rights in its entirety, especially with regard to the 2nd, 9th and 10th Amendments, and
(2) Supporting a candidate who is the one GOP contender doing hsi level best to bring about sharia law in the USA.
“Its like I have to watch the Republican candidates stand there and try to be more like Woodrow Wilson than the last one.” Sadly true.
What is chilling to me is the GOP (the incredible shrinking party of neocons and globalists — all the other candidates on the stage were CFR members) doesn’t embrace these kids who never cared about politics before. The other candidates seem afraid of losing that choke hold on citizens that DC has devised.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.