To: wideawake
I’m very fond of the bill of rights. My personal liberty must be respected. I would vote for anyone who would promise to honor the bill of rights completely. In this election, its Ron Paul.
9 posted on
11/29/2007 9:33:43 AM PST by
nsmart
To: nsmart
You have no rights under islamic-fascism.
Remember RP doesn’t thinks its an issue or one that can be solved by submarines.
18 posted on
11/29/2007 9:37:45 AM PST by
svcw
(There is no plan B.)
To: nsmart
Im very fond of the bill of rights. My personal liberty must be respected. I would vote for anyone who would promise to honor the bill of rights completely. In this election, its Ron Paul. If you're fond of the Bill of Rights, then you have even less excuse for:
(1) Adopting the analysis of a magazine that opposes the Bill of Rights in its entirety, especially with regard to the 2nd, 9th and 10th Amendments, and
(2) Supporting a candidate who is the one GOP contender doing hsi level best to bring about sharia law in the USA.
19 posted on
11/29/2007 9:39:11 AM PST by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: nsmart
Mr. Constitution calls splitting the ticket with Kucinich "premature" and not out of the question. (See post 10.)
Show a little respect for reality if not for your own credibility!
23 posted on
11/29/2007 9:41:39 AM PST by
drpix
To: nsmart
I’m guessing the “n” stands for “not”.
95 posted on
11/29/2007 11:27:27 AM PST by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson