[dit_xi]

Duncan Hunter is the only presidential candidate with the guts to speak out against the Chicom's unfair trade practices, currency manipulation by devaluing their yuan, and illegal subsidies to their manufacturers.

Guess who among the presidential top tier candidates voted to grant the Chicom Most Favor Nation Trading Status? It certainly wasn't Duncan Hunter!

Duncan Hunter: "China is cheating on trade."

[cripplecreek]

With chinese made and supplied weapons being found in the hands of our enemies I want to know who the candidates are going to support. Our soldiers or the big money screw America for a buck crowd?

Conscience anyone?

[zerosix]

"Will Congress Sell Out the American People at "U.S." multinational CEOs' Request?"

In a single word, YES!

[Kevmo]

Thanks for posting this.
B4DH

.

.

Why the smart money is on Duncan Hunter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926032/posts
Posted on 11/15/2007 3:43:17 AM PST by Kevmo

[dit_xi]

Hunter Ping!

Duncan Hunter’s message against the Chicom’s unfair trade practices, currency manipulation and illegal subsidies are scaring the pants off these globalist CEO’s.

[Man50D]

Meanwhile U.S. imports from China have jumped from $102 billion to $287 billion.

While the number of lead based toys has jumped.

It is often said that Beijing’s aims are not ‘transparent” because Chinese officials give up nothing in the endless rounds of talks that are constantly being conducted under the “engagement” approach. But for those who can see (and count), the Chinese strategic objective is quite obvious: to overthrow American “hegemony” around the world.

Duncan Hunter sees their objective and will cut them off at the knees with chopsticks.

[AuntB]

Actually, Hunter is the only candidate, top or bottom tier who voted against MFN for china or didn’t show support for it. Tancredo, to his credit, admits his vote for it was a mistake. Paul is proud of it and says he’d trade with anyone, even our enemies.

Tammy Bruce on one of the debates:

” Hunter is coming across as the strongest, most clear on what’s happening internationally, and the impact of Unfair Trade on this country. I find it slightly ridiculous that these men, who’ve been in office forever, are talking incessantly about how things have to change in Washington when they’ve been in that town for decades creating the problem. It’s as though they think they can convince us they’re all outsiders or something. Listening to John “Amnesty” McCain talking about the need for change is especially surreal.

Duncan Hunter notes 1.8 million jobs going to Communist China is the problem. Bravo. Yeah, notes that all the senators voted for Most Favored Nation status for China, sending those jobs to that pit. He was great.”

http://tammybruce.com/2007/10/liveblogging_republica.php

[RetiredArmy]

It DOES NOT MATTER what the issue is, if it means more power for the Congress or screwing the US into the ground, the marxists and RINOs in Congress are for it. Regardless of subject.

[stephenjohnbanker]

BTTT

[DoughtyOne]

Will they? LOL, that’s like asking Lee Harvey in 1978 if he intends any harm to Kennedy.

[gidget7]

Yes he is the only one, and this is the only reason I can come up with for the RNC’s unwillingness to allow his campaign to go anywhere beyond where it has. It’s then, up to us to get his name and face out there and drum up support.

[Hunterite]

“On November 14, the CEOs of 105 major transnational corporations sent a letter ...”

*************

You know, I was really hoping I would never have to hear that phrase “transnational corporation” during my lifetime.

Im a science fiction reader, back in the early 1990’s I read the Mars trilogy “red mars, blue mars, green mars”. God hard sci-fi read (although too much leftist ideology)

Transnat = Transnational Corporation
Metanat = Metanational Corporations (consolidated Transnats)

By the end of the book there were 7 remaining Metanats employing 90% of the people on the planet.

[Sun]

Duncan Hunter:

“I watched their military build up. They are building up at double digit pace right now. They are building lots of submarines, buying lots of high end fighter aircraft from the Russians, building about 100 short range ballistic missiles a year.

China is stepping into the super power shoes that the Soviet Union left. Now we can have a good relationship with China; but it will have to be a relationship based on American Strength. I think Ronald Reagan proved that to us in our era of conflict and competition with the Soviet Union.”

http://blog.barofintegrity.us/2007/09/04/duncan-hunter-interview-with-hugh-hewitt.aspx

[Reaganwuzthebest]

So is Congress for sale to the China lobby?

The US has been giving in to China since the early 90s and it got especially worse under Clinton. Unlike them and India, two countries who work tirelessly to preserve an advantage in trade the US seems to bend over backwards to accommodate everyone.

[wolfcreek]

Wonder who China will elect for president this time around?

You can bet it will be a Globalist.

[Greg F]

from $18 billion to $52 billion. Meanwhile U.S. imports from China have jumped from $102 billion to $287 billion.
__________________________

288% increase for US exports to China in the last 5 years; 281% for Chinese trade. At that rate it will take about 50 years to have balanced trade with China. It looks like there is a major advance for us and not as great for China in trade . . . but when you run the numbers . . . not.

[Smokin' Joe]

Will Congress Sell Out the American People at "U.S." multinational CEOs' Request?

In a Noo Yawk second.

[Convert from ECUSA]

"Will Congress Sell Out the American People at "U.S." multinational CEOs' Request? "

Not only YES, but HELL YES! They'd sell their dying grandmothers if requested!