Bumping in support of Congressman Duncan Hunter
My Cchoice for President 2008
Hunter 2008
http://www.gohunter08.com/
Posted on 11/20/2007 10:52:22 AM PST by dit_xi
Guess who among the presidential top tier candidates voted to grant the Chicom Most Favor Nation Trading Status? It certainly wasn't Duncan Hunter!
With chinese made and supplied weapons being found in the hands of our enemies I want to know who the candidates are going to support. Our soldiers or the big money screw America for a buck crowd?
Conscience anyone?
In a single word, YES!
Thanks for posting this.
B4DH
.
.
Why the smart money is on Duncan Hunter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926032/posts
Posted on 11/15/2007 3:43:17 AM PST by Kevmo
Hunter Ping!
Duncan Hunter’s message against the Chicom’s unfair trade practices, currency manipulation and illegal subsidies are scaring the pants off these globalist CEO’s.
Actually, Hunter is the only candidate, top or bottom tier who voted against MFN for china or didn’t show support for it. Tancredo, to his credit, admits his vote for it was a mistake. Paul is proud of it and says he’d trade with anyone, even our enemies.
Tammy Bruce on one of the debates:
” Hunter is coming across as the strongest, most clear on what’s happening internationally, and the impact of Unfair Trade on this country. I find it slightly ridiculous that these men, who’ve been in office forever, are talking incessantly about how things have to change in Washington when they’ve been in that town for decades creating the problem. It’s as though they think they can convince us they’re all outsiders or something. Listening to John “Amnesty” McCain talking about the need for change is especially surreal.
Duncan Hunter notes 1.8 million jobs going to Communist China is the problem. Bravo. Yeah, notes that all the senators voted for Most Favored Nation status for China, sending those jobs to that pit. He was great.”
http://tammybruce.com/2007/10/liveblogging_republica.php
It DOES NOT MATTER what the issue is, if it means more power for the Congress or screwing the US into the ground, the marxists and RINOs in Congress are for it. Regardless of subject.
Nice blog entry about Hunter and trade:
http://www.rightontheright.com/node/2584
America Could Run on Duncan
Duncan Hunter is a strong Conservative with strong positions on trade, illegal immigration, taxes, the War on Terror, and he has a Conservative record on social issues. He’s the dream candidate. John from Stop the ACLU is wondering where the push for Duncan is. Just watch him: (video)
I have been long wondering where the Duncan Hunter push has been. I am in limbo with candidates at this point, and I’m actually considering of casting my first vote for Duncan Hunter. He deserves it.
BTTT
Probably
Will they? LOL, that’s like asking Lee Harvey in 1978 if he intends any harm to Kennedy.
Yes he is the only one, and this is the only reason I can come up with for the RNC’s unwillingness to allow his campaign to go anywhere beyond where it has. It’s then, up to us to get his name and face out there and drum up support.
This is off topic but I just wanted to say something. It's the biased media that started using (and repeating ad nauseum) the terms "Top tier" and "Bottom tier" in order to plant a seed in people's minds that THIS group can win, and THAT group can't.
I've noticed that many people have gone along with it and are using those terms themselves, which is putting a label on their own candidate. Not only does that dignify what the MSM is doing, but it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, when it is repeated over and over that certain candidates are 'bottom tier' (which implies no chance of winning.) It becomes the reality. That is why I'm suprised people are going along with using those labels designed by the MSM.... don't do that, it just helps reinforce what they're doing.
That's all I wanted to say, and I'm saying this as someone who likes Duncan Hunter and agrees with him on most issues, so it's not meant to be negative, but encouraging.
Carry on! :-)
>Will Co0ngress Sell Out the American People at “U.S.” multinational CEOs’ Request?<
>>In a single word, YES!<<
In half a heart beat! Our government no longer serves the American people. We serve at the government’s pleasure!!!!
It is alright to use one of those labels as long as it is qualified with ‘so-called’ and then surrounded by scare quotes. (Ex: The so-called “top-tier”.) heh
“On November 14, the CEOs of 105 major transnational corporations sent a letter ...”
*************
You know, I was really hoping I would never have to hear that phrase “transnational corporation” during my lifetime.
Im a science fiction reader, back in the early 1990’s I read the Mars trilogy “red mars, blue mars, green mars”. God hard sci-fi read (although too much leftist ideology)
Transnat = Transnational Corporation
Metanat = Metanational Corporations (consolidated Transnats)
By the end of the book there were 7 remaining Metanats employing 90% of the people on the planet.
You’re right, in fact I was going to mention that, but I forgot. Thanks. ;-)
Duncan Hunter:
“I watched their military build up. They are building up at double digit pace right now. They are building lots of submarines, buying lots of high end fighter aircraft from the Russians, building about 100 short range ballistic missiles a year.
China is stepping into the super power shoes that the Soviet Union left. Now we can have a good relationship with China; but it will have to be a relationship based on American Strength. I think Ronald Reagan proved that to us in our era of conflict and competition with the Soviet Union.”
http://blog.barofintegrity.us/2007/09/04/duncan-hunter-interview-with-hugh-hewitt.aspx
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.