Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: theothercheek

The most realistic thing Paul has a shot at is shoring up the election for Hillary.


2 posted on 11/07/2007 5:56:10 AM PST by elizabetty ("Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." .Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: elizabetty

Single-issue anti-war voters would vote for Paul instead of Hillary, but would vote for Hillary or stay home if she was running against Rudy.


5 posted on 11/07/2007 5:57:54 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: elizabetty

“The most realistic thing Paul has a shot at is shoring up the election for Hillary.”

It worked well for Bubba with a third party Ross Perot and 42% of the liberal vote.


23 posted on 11/07/2007 6:28:26 AM PST by poobear (Pure democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. God save the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: elizabetty

“The most realistic thing Paul has a shot at is shoring up the election for Hillary.”

And that, my friend, is EXACTLY the point...

If Paul is polling in barely readable numbers among likely voting Republicans, WHERE is his money coming from?

His money is coming from THE LEFT, desperate to make Republicans look bad, and most definately from STORMFRONT...


48 posted on 11/07/2007 7:50:07 AM PST by tcrlaf (You can lead a Liberal to LOGIC, but you can't make it THINK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: elizabetty
The most realistic thing Paul has a shot at is shoring up the election for Hillary.

He'd probably hurt Hillary as much or more than he'd hurt the Republican candidate.

50 posted on 11/07/2007 7:51:31 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: elizabetty
The most realistic thing Paul has a shot at is shoring up the election for Hillary.

You know that the only way Paul can do that, is to run as a 3rd party candidate, which he said he wouldn't.

97 posted on 11/07/2007 9:13:09 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: elizabetty

If Hildebeast wins the blame falls squarely on the shoulders of the GOP for, among many other failings, being unable or unwilling to field a legitimate conservative candidate.


268 posted on 11/08/2007 12:31:07 AM PST by Proud2BAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: elizabetty

Yep, Ross Perot - o-oo, the initials are the same - pay attention people - had a good message too and we all know who he got elected.


377 posted on 11/10/2007 8:18:02 AM PST by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: elizabetty
The most realistic thing Paul has a shot at is shoring up the election for Hillary.

Hillary will not be the Democrat candidate. Obama will be the candidate and unless Republicans return to limited government, Obama will win.

Democrats outnumber Republicans. The people want a change of direction. Give it to them or lose.
383 posted on 11/28/2007 1:13:39 PM PST by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson