Flippers, Floppers & Frauds vs. Duncan Hunter – Part 1

News Which Cannot Lose Blog ^ | 8-28-07 | Alexander J. Madison

[WalterSkinner]

The bottom line is this. If Americans want a leader who does not attempt to hide behind the skirt of federalism, does not have to explain why he flipped and flopped like a beached cutthroat trout, and who has always understood that the unalienable right to life comes from our creator and not state politicians or courts, then Duncan Hunter is the only choice...

[b9]

Fred had a profound and humbling experience, which may actually make some men think about what they are really doing.

That’s the leadership I want.

[Reagan Man]

What?! I thought the term “Duncanista” was okay. I got it from pissant.

[pissant]

LOL. Fine, you support your Bakerite, I’ll go with the Reaganite. May the best man win.

[pissant]

Sorry Walter, I use the term too. LOL

[Reagan Man]

LOL Whatever.

[WalterSkinner]

..I think Calpernia’s label was the best of all...

[WalterSkinner]

LOL

[EternalVigilance]

Its too bad that your argument will not have any bearing on the presidential race.

Wanna bet?

[Reagan Man]

Yeah, I do.

A gentleman's wager.

[Calpernia]

Bump for Duncan Hunter!

[pissant]

Hunter’s Rangers? I like it too.

[WalterSkinner]

..yeah, that's the ticket

Doesn't have any Marxist Guerrilla connotations...

[EternalVigilance]

You don't like the federalist position on abortion. Fine.

Wrong. I don't like the pseudo-Federalist postition that pretends that states' rights trump inalienable God-given rights.

[EternalVigilance]

Sorry, but if we're ever going to stop abortion on demand from being the policy of this great nation, we have to start by ending Roe v Wade as the law of the land.

Wrong. You have to first establish the personhood of the unborn; morally, intellectually, politically, and legally, not pretend that states' rights trump inalienable rights.

Stephen A. Douglas still has egg on his historical face over that one. I'm surprised you want to emulate him.

[Reagan Man]

There you go again, questioning my integrity.

Enough already.

[Atlas Sneezed]

..Federalism, does not empower the states to violate a fundamental right which permeates our foundational documents— taking of innocent life...

---

Nor does it empower me to pull down my pants and slide on the ice.

What’s your point?

[WalterSkinner]

..the picture that conjures up is too terrible

[EternalVigilance]

Your integrity has nothing to do with it. It has to do with your position. Don’t make it personal.

[Sun]

Hi pissant,

Thought you might like this part of the e-mail I received today from the Constitution Party:

“During the SPP Summit in Quebec, where Bush was called on to “tear down the wall of
secrecy” surrounding the covert merger, a United States Congressman was calling on
the president to build a wall to secure our border with Mexico. While the president
was in Canada denying a plan to integrate North America , California Congressman
Duncan Hunter delivered a letter to Bush saying, “It is my understanding that
approximately $800 million is currently available for (fence building). Despite this
funding, only 17.9 of the 854 miles of fencing called for in the Secure Fence Act
have been completed as of Aug. 10, 2007 .”

The Constitution Party joins Congressman Hunter in calling for immediate efforts to
complete a wall at our southern border and joins with those opposed to the SPP/NAU
calling for a tearing down of the wall of secrecy surrounding any plans to merge the
United States , Mexico and Canada .”

[pissant]

Any support we can get to pressure the administration to put up that damn fence is a good thing