Skip to comments.
Flippers, Floppers & Frauds vs. Duncan Hunter – Part 1
News Which Cannot Lose Blog ^
| 8-28-07
| Alexander J. Madison
Posted on 08/28/2007 11:38:07 AM PDT by WalterSkinner
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 241-245 next last
To: pissant
Fred had a profound and humbling experience, which may actually make some men think about what they are really doing.
That’s the leadership I want.
121
posted on
08/28/2007 5:05:12 PM PDT
by
b9
To: WalterSkinner; pissant
What?! I thought the term “Duncanista” was okay. I got it from pissant.
To: Reagan Man
LOL. Fine, you support your Bakerite, I’ll go with the Reaganite. May the best man win.
123
posted on
08/28/2007 5:08:04 PM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: Reagan Man; WalterSkinner
Sorry Walter, I use the term too. LOL
124
posted on
08/28/2007 5:09:13 PM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: pissant
To: pissant
..I think Calpernia’s label was the best of all...
126
posted on
08/28/2007 5:10:50 PM PDT
by
WalterSkinner
( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
To: Reagan Man
127
posted on
08/28/2007 5:11:42 PM PDT
by
WalterSkinner
( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
To: Reagan Man
Its too bad that your argument will not have any bearing on the presidential race.
Wanna bet?
128
posted on
08/28/2007 5:11:55 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(States' rights don't trump God-given, unalienable rights...support the Reagan pro-life platform)
To: EternalVigilance
Yeah, I do.
A gentleman's wager.
To: WalterSkinner
130
posted on
08/28/2007 5:20:55 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: WalterSkinner
Hunter’s Rangers? I like it too.
131
posted on
08/28/2007 5:21:45 PM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: Calpernia; pissant
..yeah, that's the ticket
Doesn't have any Marxist Guerrilla connotations...
132
posted on
08/28/2007 5:26:33 PM PDT
by
WalterSkinner
( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
To: Reagan Man
You don't like the federalist position on abortion. Fine. Wrong. I don't like the pseudo-Federalist postition that pretends that states' rights trump inalienable God-given rights.
133
posted on
08/28/2007 5:29:27 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(States' rights don't trump God-given, unalienable rights...support the Reagan pro-life platform)
To: Reagan Man
Sorry, but if we're ever going to stop abortion on demand from being the policy of this great nation, we have to start by ending Roe v Wade as the law of the land. Wrong. You have to first establish the personhood of the unborn; morally, intellectually, politically, and legally, not pretend that states' rights trump inalienable rights.
Stephen A. Douglas still has egg on his historical face over that one. I'm surprised you want to emulate him.
134
posted on
08/28/2007 5:33:20 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(States' rights don't trump God-given, unalienable rights...support the Reagan pro-life platform)
To: EternalVigilance
There you go again, questioning my integrity.
Enough already.
To: WalterSkinner
..Federalism, does not empower the states to violate a fundamental right which permeates our foundational documents— taking of innocent life...
Nor does it empower me to pull down my pants and slide on the ice.
What’s your point?
136
posted on
08/28/2007 5:42:42 PM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
To: Beelzebubba
..the picture that conjures up is too terrible
137
posted on
08/28/2007 5:48:05 PM PDT
by
WalterSkinner
( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
To: Reagan Man
Your integrity has nothing to do with it. It has to do with your position. Don’t make it personal.
138
posted on
08/28/2007 5:50:00 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(States' rights don't trump God-given, unalienable rights...support the Reagan pro-life platform)
To: All; pissant
Hi pissant,
Thought you might like this part of the e-mail I received today from the Constitution Party:
“During the SPP Summit in Quebec, where Bush was called on to “tear down the wall of
secrecy” surrounding the covert merger, a United States Congressman was calling on
the president to build a wall to secure our border with Mexico. While the president
was in Canada denying a plan to integrate North America , California Congressman
Duncan Hunter delivered a letter to Bush saying, “It is my understanding that
approximately $800 million is currently available for (fence building). Despite this
funding, only 17.9 of the 854 miles of fencing called for in the Secure Fence Act
have been completed as of Aug. 10, 2007 .”
The Constitution Party joins Congressman Hunter in calling for immediate efforts to
complete a wall at our southern border and joins with those opposed to the SPP/NAU
calling for a tearing down of the wall of secrecy surrounding any plans to merge the
United States , Mexico and Canada .”
139
posted on
08/28/2007 6:03:20 PM PDT
by
Sun
(Duncan Hunter: pro-life/borders, understands Red China threat! http://www.gohunter08.com/Home.aspx)
To: Sun
Any support we can get to pressure the administration to put up that damn fence is a good thing
140
posted on
08/28/2007 6:04:53 PM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 241-245 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
