1 posted on
02/25/2007 2:47:02 PM PST by
wagglebee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: Reagan Man; pissant; Jim Robinson; cgk; Coleus; narses; 8mmMauser; WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
2 posted on
02/25/2007 2:48:52 PM PST by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
Oooh, you're going to get them mad.
3 posted on
02/25/2007 2:49:00 PM PST by
flashbunny
(<--- CLICK HERE IF YOU HATE RINOS! Free Anti RINO graphics!)
To: wagglebee; Mrs. Frogjerk; Fiddlstix; cowtowney; xsmommy; TitansAFC; coton_lover; SoCalPol; ...
+
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:
Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
4 posted on
02/25/2007 2:49:38 PM PST by
narses
("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
To: wagglebee
6 posted on
02/25/2007 2:50:20 PM PST by
digger48
To: wagglebee
7 posted on
02/25/2007 2:50:20 PM PST by
Enosh
(†)
To: wagglebee
I will get banded if I post their real names.
8 posted on
02/25/2007 2:50:29 PM PST by
bmwcyle
(It is time to stop the left at the wall.)
To: wagglebee
WHAT SHOULD WE CALL FREE REPUBLIC LIBERALS? "
Obamanations?
9 posted on
02/25/2007 2:50:35 PM PST by
isthisnickcool
(Oh! The Obamanation! Durka durka durka...)
To: wagglebee
Great. Just what this forum needs. More name calling.
11 posted on
02/25/2007 2:51:55 PM PST by
RedRover
To: wagglebee
At this point, our top three choices are Mitt Romney (pro abortion, pro gay marriage until about a week ago), John McCain (Captain Queeg on steroids), and Rudolph Giuliani (tough on crime, soft on social issues). Of those three, the man most qualified to be President and wage the War On Terror, is Giuliani. And he can win the general election.
You may call that being a CINO. I call it realistic.
13 posted on
02/25/2007 2:53:17 PM PST by
Argus
To: wagglebee
What Should We Call Free Republic Liberals
Exiled!
14 posted on
02/25/2007 2:53:21 PM PST by
loboinok
(Gun control is hitting what you aim at!)
To: wagglebee
15 posted on
02/25/2007 2:53:48 PM PST by
woofie
To: wagglebee
..I would always plead for civility on both sides
But one thing is striking--the condescension towards social conservatives and the not too subtle hints that they are bigoted and willing to hand the White House to Hillary because of their principles...
16 posted on
02/25/2007 2:54:41 PM PST by
WalterSkinner
( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
To: wagglebee
22 posted on
02/25/2007 2:58:03 PM PST by
LimberJim
(It says "Breakfast Any Time", right? I'll have the pancakes in the Age of Enlightenment.)
To: wagglebee
Bleepers?
Seriously, I think they contribute to the debate.
27 posted on
02/25/2007 3:00:42 PM PST by
Brad from Tennessee
(Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
To: wagglebee
free republic liberals...
29 posted on
02/25/2007 3:04:26 PM PST by
sit-rep
( http://trulineint.com/latestposts.asp)
To: wagglebee
I don't know but it seems to me that Rudy has become the new Terry Schiavo of Free Republic. At this point I would even welcome a few threads about Anna Nicole or Britany Spears.
30 posted on
02/25/2007 3:04:41 PM PST by
faq
To: wagglebee
Why "call" them anything Waggy? They are our opponents.The enemy in many cases.
Hope you are'nt threatened by their presence, cause things might wind down to zero without their silly games and ploys.
What's the big deal about name-calling anyhow.
Adults who are fairly secure in their own maturity and sanity are usually not bothered by creeps and juviniles...we actually have a few of our own who invariably reveal sanity gaps on a regular basis.
We often surf their turf to get some idea of the idiocy they openly are brewing...so what the hay?
It'll be amusing to review the list of perjoratives you are accumulating. Let's see if "fellow Americans" make your cut.
31 posted on
02/25/2007 3:05:04 PM PST by
CBart95
To: wagglebee
However, what about those FReepers who seem totally comfortable with Rudy's liberalism? Look, the thinking on Rudy is simple: He can beat Hillary. Whatever his flaws, some FReepers think beating Hillary is so important that they will turn to any Man on Horseback who presents himelf, be he a tyrant or a liberal.
Personally, I no longer think it makes any difference who holds the Presidency - as we are currently seeing, The Agenda will not be impacted. So you might as well vote your conscience.
32 posted on
02/25/2007 3:09:06 PM PST by
Mr. Jeeves
("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: wagglebee
I guess I'll answer your question with another question. If Rudy's the Republican nominee & you sit on your hands (again) & allow Hillary Clinton to be elected with a Democrat House & possibly a Democrat + RINO filibuster-proof Senate, will you then be happy?
34 posted on
02/25/2007 3:11:21 PM PST by
pookie18
([Hillary Rotten] Clinton Happens...as does Dr. Demento Dean, Bela Pelosi & Benedick Durbin!!)
To: wagglebee
Democrats?
That's who's platform they are supporting...
36 posted on
02/25/2007 3:20:44 PM PST by
El Laton Caliente
(NRA Member & GUNSNET.NET Moderator)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson