Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity) Evolution the Lie
Creationist

Posted on 02/18/2007 11:15:33 AM PST by Creationist

The Theory of Evolution is a wound upon society inflicted by proclaimed erudite men. This festering wound is easily transmitted. It is spread into almost every thing children read at public school; fictional books, geography, biology ECT. ECT.. It is portrayed by Hollywood This travesty is supported by our tax dollars and is never corrected when proved wrong, it is destroying our society with its Godless belief. It will be said that they can not afford new book, well just rip out the pages that are incorrect or mark them out with a permanent marker.

This hypothesis has been proved incorrect at every turn. Even the author of the revolution or “god to the hardened believer, Darwin, had doubts in his belief. Darwin expected the future to find factual evidence in support of this miraculous idea. Over 150 years later still no proof. Why in fact there is more evidence to the contrary discovered by scientist who do not accept Jesus. The mountain of evidence against the theory is so compelling, yet those who can not or will not except a Supernatural power as the Creator of it all continue to make up hypothesis’s that require supernatural power to make it happen.

Evolution can not happen, changing from one species to another. They will show “microevolution,” really adaptation or variation as evidence. This is not so because there is not a new species, they are still roses, horses, dogs, cats, corn, ECT. ECT.. What are the supposed mechanisms of evolution; mutations and natural selection. Well natural selection can not do it and it should really be called random selection. Natural selection only selects at random, it takes intelligence to select a particular one. Random acts would almost never pick the exact correct sequence. Mathematicians will tell you random selection is chaotic and would never create intelligent organization. Mutations can not do it. Mutation are 99.9% harmful to the organism. What does not kill it or make it sterile makes it weaker and less likely to survive. If by chance it does, the DNA stasis will act upon the organism and if it has offspring they will revert back to the original within a generation or two.

The only way is for the “Hopeful Monsters” that Goldschmidt dreamt up. Millions of mutations happening at once about every 50,000 years, beneficial, happening to 2 males and 2 females in a close proximity each pair giving birth to the exact same kind of new species one male and one female. What that means folks is one breeding pair of lizards gave birth to a male chicken and within a mile or less another breeding pair of lizards gave birth to a female chicken, both with the right organs to breed and continue the new species. Whew! if that is not a faith based belief then what is. When is the next 50,000 years up?

Though the theory in general does not claim origins but it is in text books, Chemical evolution. Chemical evolution is a proposed process which does not exist today ( therefore it is not science and is a religious belief ) in which a reducing atmosphere ( no evidence in the rocks for this ) existed and rain fell upon rocks and created a chemical soup in our oceans. Lighting struck a puddle and life appeared with all the complexity of DNA and RNA installed. Stanley Miller performed an experiment in a controlled environment in which he created simple amino acids both D and L (left and right handed). Every type of amino acid in animals is left handed, no animal or man could live with right handed (D) in them. Every time amino acids are synthesized in a laboratory they create equal amount of left and right. If it can not be done in a controlled atmosphere with billions of dollars, how can random actions ever be expected to do it.

Evidence for evolution is just not there. The fossil record shows no evidence of transitional forms. There is nothing in the Precambrian that supports lower life forms evolving into the Cambrian Explosion. Evolutionist can not explain why there is a explosion of complex organisms in the Cambrian layer. This layer of evidence is condescending to their theory and they do not wish to acknowledge it as so. The slow processes of today could not create the sedimentary rock layers we see in the geology. The fossil layers the coal fields the sedimentary rock are all best explained by the global flood of Noah’s time.

Evolution has no proof, only conjecture believed by millions. Excepted by these millions because they are told by the government funded educated people of self proclaimed expertise. As the Bible says and how the Super rich and high up government official believe we are sheep, cattle to the latter, following believing expecting our leaders to tell us and teach us the truth. This is not going to happen, there is an agenda to this theory, it is to undermine God’s authority and to make people believe they are nothing more than animals. You teach then they are animals and they will act like them just look at how much the world has changed in the past 70 or so years due to the mandated teaching of this godless theory.

Every day more is discovered and science tries to explain it with their complex naturalistic ideals that defy the laws of nature and physics. When the answer is so simple God whose name is Jesus Created it all in six literal 24 hour days, and he did not use evolution anywhere in his process.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Education; Religion; Science
KEYWORDS: fsmdidit; goddidit; noonelooksatkeywords; satire
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-327 last
To: si tacuissem

Its not wrong what Im saying!

Gaius Seutonius---- who also wrote of meeting a jew named Aquilla comin from Italy with his wife Priscilla because Claudius had commanded that all jews leave Rome. These people were also mentioned in the bible. Not to mention the Bible its self is an absolutly credible historical book which was kept in writting for thousands of years, from the old testament to the new inwhich it is tied together in its entirety. This doesnt just happen, and yet we are keeping the very year 2,007 which is the recorded time since Christ and has been kept since Christ why would they do this for a supposed passing hoax, lets get real!! do you honestly question the historicity with a strait face!!!!


321 posted on 02/27/2007 5:54:38 PM PST by Wakeup Sleeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: si tacuissem

I dont say Cornelius Tacitus is one of the most accurate, Historians do!


322 posted on 02/27/2007 5:56:52 PM PST by Wakeup Sleeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Wakeup Sleeper

Or should I say historical references? And the ardent angst only shows a stone in your shoe about something! The reason people want to disprove Christ is because they dont want to face sin and its consequences, but it isnt going to work like that! no amount of excuses are going to cover it up the excuse makers have been going on for thousands of years but the word of God is still with us speaking truth to this day and will be until that day comes. Every knee will bow and every toungue will confess!

Ive been a sinner also but I am forgiven in Christ which anyone can have this gift, its up to you!!!!


323 posted on 02/27/2007 6:28:02 PM PST by Wakeup Sleeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Wakeup Sleeper
Not to mention the Bible its self is an absolutly credible historical book which was kept in writting for thousands of years, from the old testament to the new inwhich it is tied together in its entirety. This doesnt just happen, and yet we are keeping the very year 2,007 which is the recorded time since Christ and has been kept since Christ why would they do this for a supposed passing hoax, lets get real!!


324 posted on 02/27/2007 11:55:40 PM PST by si tacuissem (.. lurker mansissem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: Wakeup Sleeper
Its not wrong what Im saying!

Your statement:

There is more historical writings of Christ than any other historical figure in all of history at the time of Christ or before. Thats pretty damming to your assumptions. More than Ceasar, Nero, etc... etc... (post #268)
is wrong: All the historians you cite to prove it wrote more - and in greater detail - about Caesar, Nero, etc... etc...
325 posted on 02/28/2007 12:06:53 AM PST by si tacuissem (.. lurker mansissem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: Wakeup Sleeper
I got news for you si tacuissem, that article didnt say anything worth reading! It explained nothing!

Could you give a source which you put trust in?

326 posted on 02/28/2007 12:21:56 AM PST by si tacuissem (.. lurker mansissem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Wakeup Sleeper
By Historical means By mathmatical calculations as to when things occured, and ratios. And then use deductive reasoning. I believe it would be much more effective.

In the middle-ages, only the testimonies of witnesses and the confessions of the defendant were accepted in court. Nowadays, we examine direct and indirect evidence.

The same is true for the historical sciences...

327 posted on 02/28/2007 12:41:17 AM PST by si tacuissem (.. lurker mansissem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-327 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson