Posted on 10/24/2006 5:24:00 AM PDT by Jon Alvarez
Thanks for the heads up about the bans. Good riddance to both.
I don't feel that way. I disagree with them on some issues, but the same is true for untold thousands of Freepers who have not been banned.
They were promoting putting the party of treason in charge in a time of war. If JimRob doesn't want to tolerate such crap, I say good for him.
And stop attacking me via freepmail.......
I understand your interpretation of FR rules now.
You can call me any name you like ("crazy," not of "even average intelligence," a lemming, a Kool-aid drinker, etc. etc. etc....), but I am not permitted to respond by assessing your behavior (evasive, cowardly, discouraging, picture-posting, game-playing).
Now that I understand your double standard and hypocrisy, I can leave you alone......AFTER you show me where you answered the question. I've read through your posts ad nauseum and haven't seen it.
No more nasty freepmails, Prot. The gig is up.
If you must know, I do hope the Republicans remain in control of both Houses, but if they want to do it with my support they are going to have to act like Republicans, or act almost like Republicans.
ML/NJ
I didn't see them doing that. Perhaps you could point out the post?
If I show you the post where I answered the question even before you asked it, will you promise to never post to me again and stop attacking me in Freepmail?
Please refrain from namecalling, thank you.
The freepmails are on the record, Prot. Do you want me to alert the mods to the fact that you started with an abusive freep to which I responded, and then you proceeded to say "Screw you" and attack my Christianity?
Do you really want the truth known about your rule breaking behavior?
Or do you want to stop lying right here and now?
Flame wars are counter to posting guidelines. Please do not post to me anymore. I have asked you three times now. Please stop the abusive behavior. Thank you.
It is an attempt to get you to honestly debate conservatism based on statements you have made on this forum, and false accusations and personal attacks you have repeatedly made of me both in public and in private.
But since you refuse to behave honorably I will cease and desist.........no more attacks via freepmail from you, and we have a deal.
Don't ever post to me again..........even a picture.
Behave with honor. I always do.
I'm done.
Great plan, sit at home and hide while liberals take power.
How about getting involved - making yourself heard - heck, if you feel that strongly - run for office.
But criticism of those who claim to be uber-conservatives who plan to stay at home this November is legitmate. Most, in fact the VAST majority, of those calling Rush, Hannity et al with such claims are nothing more than seminar callers - liberals trying to make those few of you who actually think this way feel legitimized. Al Gore thanks you for your support.
America would benefit from a conservative revival, yes or no?
And if enough people follow your "principled" lead and the Dems get control, will you feel all warm and fuzzy inside?
Heh-heh! Nice shot.
The fact that you dodged both of my questions is merely more proof that your position is weak and emotion-based.
Yes, America would benefit from more conservatism. But anyone who is willing to give the Congress to the Party of Treason for two years is not advancing conservatism. If your revival could be achieved in this way (and if you think it could be you don't remember the GOP caucus prior to '94) how many years will you give the Party of Treason in order to get your revival? How many American lives will you be willing to pay so you can have your revival?
Now, are you going to answer the questions I posed, or is that too tough for ya?
I live in Illinois and the tendency holds true here. The fact that Topinka is Blago in a dress doesn't mean that most Republicans are as liberal as most Dems, not by a long shot, not even here.
Well, first off you're playing semantic games. Someone can want the GOP to be punished with a loss in this election but that doesn't mean they're calling for the dems to get in? Riiiiiiiiiight!
But then there's this, from Alvarez's vanity rant:
No, Rush, I’m not a cut and run conservative. I’d prefer to be labeled a scorched earth conservative. I am so fed up with the greed and corruption of these out of touch, spineless career politicians that I am planning to vote for the opponent of the incumbent in each race this November, regardless of political affiliation.
So, if the Not-Conservative-Enough Party is in control of both houses, and we throw all the incumbents out, the Party of Treason gets to control both houses in January. Clear enough now?
Please refrain from namecalling, thank you.
It's a quote from a movie. You know, like the one you used in post 348.
BTW, I'm curious...were Alvarez and sandbar already banned when you got here? If not, why didn't you chide Alvarez for his rough comments? Why didn't you address Hemingway's Ghost's comments in post 123?
Suggest you apply your standards to those who agree with you as well as those who have seen your political illiteracy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.