I didn't see them doing that. Perhaps you could point out the post?
Well, first off you're playing semantic games. Someone can want the GOP to be punished with a loss in this election but that doesn't mean they're calling for the dems to get in? Riiiiiiiiiight!
But then there's this, from Alvarez's vanity rant:
No, Rush, I’m not a cut and run conservative. I’d prefer to be labeled a scorched earth conservative. I am so fed up with the greed and corruption of these out of touch, spineless career politicians that I am planning to vote for the opponent of the incumbent in each race this November, regardless of political affiliation.
So, if the Not-Conservative-Enough Party is in control of both houses, and we throw all the incumbents out, the Party of Treason gets to control both houses in January. Clear enough now?
Please refrain from namecalling, thank you.
It's a quote from a movie. You know, like the one you used in post 348.
BTW, I'm curious...were Alvarez and sandbar already banned when you got here? If not, why didn't you chide Alvarez for his rough comments? Why didn't you address Hemingway's Ghost's comments in post 123?
Suggest you apply your standards to those who agree with you as well as those who have seen your political illiteracy.