Skip to comments.
THE PROOF THAT DEMOCRATIC OPERATIVES WERE AFTER MARK FOLEY SINCE 2004!!
Gateway Pundit ^
| 10/3/06
Posted on 10/03/2006 5:38:37 AM PDT by areafiftyone
THE PROOF THAT DEMOCRATIC OPERATIVES WERE AFTER MARK FOLEY SINCE 2004!!
From a March 2005 post at BlogActive
Sister Toldjah leads you down the path to
Macsmind.
**You must read the whole Macsmind update.**
Macsmind put together this link to the Foley memos:
Theyre may be a possibilty that the one who runs Blog Active.com, and the one who runs Stop Sex Predators may be one in the same. That may be Mike Rogers, the infamous Gay Republican Outer.
Via Rogers site:
Well the good news is that the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is finally getting it. I called their Director of Communications, Bill Burton, to let him know that the Foley thing (and another case) were coming down the pike. While Burton promised to have someone email or return my call and didnt, I am glad he followed up on my call and was ready on Friday to come out of the gate running.
The bad new is they are still not paying enough attention
There are others within reach
If the Democrats would only fight half as hard as the Republicans
Rogers is miffed that the DCCC has been deleting his posts. No wonder as even they sense a major backfire if it gets out that this was all a Gay Republican Outing that netted more than it bargained for.
Now... Get this posting at Blog Active back on March 4, 2005:![](http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7050/620/320/rogers%20foley.jpg)
(Click to Enlarge)
Here are the threats and plans to destroy Mark Foley printed at a Leftist-haters blog back in March of 2005:
Birds of a Feather
Two haters, one picture:
Gay-bashing straight man John Ashcroft and Gay-bashing gay man Mark Foley
This is United States Congressman Mark Foley
He voted this week for a law to allow hate groups to fire gay and lesbian people at will
The law he is supporting will overrule ANY local laws on the matter.
MARK FOLEY IS GAY
MARK FOLEY WILL BE EXPOSED FOR THE HYPOCRITE HE IS THROUGH A MAIL AND INTERNET CAMPAIGN THAT WILL REACH INTO EVERY HOME IN HIS DISTRICT.
THIS MAN IS A DANGER
TO GAY MEN AND LESBIANS
DO NOT SLEEP WITH THIS MAN
IF HE CRUISES YOU IN THE BATHROOMS OF CONGRESS,IGNORE HIM!
IF HE HITS ON YOU AT THE NEXT REPUBLICAN CONVENTIONIGNORE HIM!
THE NATION MUST BE WARNED ABOUT THIS
ABOMINATION IN THE GAY COMMUNITY
Please to support our educational and advertising campaign against this right wing hypocrite, click here and join the battle for true lesbian and gay liberation.
**COMING MONDAY ON BLOGACTIVE:** The entire Mark Foley story...Read about my recorded discussions with staff members and former staff members of Rep. Mark Foley...Read about how Mark Foley hit on men less than half his age at the Republican convention...Read about how Mark Foley voted to remove protections from those same young gay men and lesbians and anyone else violating a local discrimination law!!!
And back in 2004 there were open threats in the Washington Blade by Rogers targeting Foley:
20 offices said targeted
Not likely, say Mike Rogers and John Aravosis, the two men loosely heading an ongoing outing campaign on the Hill. As the date nears for a Senate vote on the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would ban gay marriages in the Constitution, Rogers said the outings have picked up steam from 13 documented offices to nearly 20 currently on a target list provided by Rogers to the Blade.
In addition to Tolman, Rogers and Aravosis, working in tandem but not together, claimed in the last week to have outed via the Web Democratic Sen. Barbara Mikulski of Maryland and Republican Congressman Mark Foley of Florida.
While Tolman confirmed he is gay, the Mikulskis office refused to comment on speculation she is a lesbian, something Aravosis implied last week on his site.
A spokesperson for Congressman Mark Foley (R-Fla.) also declined to comment after Aravosis specifically asserted that Foley is gay on his Web site last week.
Both members of Congress have long been the subject of rumors about their sexual orientation.
Foley abused his position and may have been involved in criminal activity.
Democrats knew this for over a year.
With 6 weeks before the November elections, they broke the dam loose!
More from March 2005 at BlogActive...
From the gay outing website on March 22, 2005:
blogACTIVE.com has confirmed with three separate sources that, in fact, US Rep. Mark Foley is a gay man. Foley has voted to support discrimination against gay men and lesbians on more than one occasion.
A source has confirmed with blogACTIVE.com that Foley lives a practically an out life at his Florida residence, often seen entertaining gay men, some of whom the source described as "close to underage."
...I've thought hard about what kind of TAKE ACTION would work, but there is really is none right now. Everyone already knows Foley's a self hating closet case. When we get closer to the mid-term elections, I am sure more will surface.
And, there you have it!
Now... AJ Strata has
more proof of Mike Roger's intentions
recorded in December 2005:
Not only did I receive a nice number of tips, but I have also been put in contact with a number of new sources of information. Lets just say, 2006 is going to be a busy year on the site.
...Ive been able to dedicate all of your support to blogACTIVE to the research of hypocrites. In one case, I even had to buy two last minute tickets to fly to sources meetings I could not mention at the time (youll have to trust me, six months time will prove one of those trips was worth every penny).
Others in the Game: La Shawn Barber, Passionate America, Michelle Malkin, HotAir, Just One Minute, Flopping Aces, Right Wing Nuthouse, Dan Riehl has an update Powerline, Instapundit, Ace, RedState, Wizbang, TigerHawk, American Thinker...Gay Patriot weighs in.
Danegerus has a roundup.
(Let me clarify, there are
2 issues here: There is the
sexual predator issue that is abominable, and then there is the
skunk issue, those that waited with their reports while children were in jeopardy until
6 weeks outside of an election to release their "news"!)
Previously:The Foley FalloutFoley Fallout: What We Know Now Foleygate! Altered Images! What's Going On Here?
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Reference; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: billburton; blogactive; dccc; foley; foleygate; markfoley; mikerogers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Why didn't the Democrats do something in 2004?
To: areafiftyone
The polls were telling them they didn't need to in '04.
2
posted on
10/03/2006 5:42:22 AM PDT
by
digger48
To: areafiftyone
"IF HE CRUISES YOU IN THE BATHROOMS ...."What a romantic lifestyle...
3
posted on
10/03/2006 5:42:33 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
To: areafiftyone
They were hard up for dates too, and thought Foley would do in a pinch.
4
posted on
10/03/2006 5:43:44 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: areafiftyone
Aravosis specifically asserted that Foley is gay on his Web site How could Foley be "gay on a website"? Either he is gay, or not.
(Poor writing gripe... Sorry, my mom was an English teacher)
To: Mr. Brightside; All
What pisses me off is the Democrats are screaming for Hasert's head in the meantime they knew about Foley as early as 2004!
6
posted on
10/03/2006 6:03:01 AM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
To: areafiftyone
"What pisses me off is the Democrats are screaming for Hasert's head in the meantime they knew about Foley as early as 2004!"
Hence, I adopted my tag line and have vowed to post it permanently!
7
posted on
10/03/2006 6:06:47 AM PDT
by
poobear
(Political Left, continually accusing their foes of what THEY themselves do every day.)
To: poobear
And I'm not saying the Republicans are innocent in this - they ignored it and are now reaping what they sowed, but the Democrats are JUST AS GUILTY!
8
posted on
10/03/2006 6:08:41 AM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
To: areafiftyone
If Republicans had punished him in 2004 or 2005, they would have been accused of "gay bashing."
That being said, we should have taken our lumps and gotten rid of him then.
To: Mr. Brightside
I would rather they be accused of gay bashing then enabling a pedophile!
10
posted on
10/03/2006 6:10:45 AM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
To: Mr. Brightside
That being said, we should have taken our lumps and gotten rid of him then EXACTLY!
11
posted on
10/03/2006 6:11:22 AM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
To: areafiftyone
You're preachin' to the choir bro! We're on the same page!
12
posted on
10/03/2006 6:12:50 AM PDT
by
poobear
(Political Left, continually accusing their foes of what THEY themselves do every day.)
To: poobear
:-)
13
posted on
10/03/2006 6:14:09 AM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
To: areafiftyone
14
posted on
10/03/2006 6:15:44 AM PDT
by
tiki
To: areafiftyone
I wish this were seen by many people. It is a great post.
15
posted on
10/03/2006 6:52:57 AM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(" Surrender NANCY!" What did you and other Dem leaders know and when about Foley???)
To: areafiftyone
Why didn't the Democrats do something in 2004? They did. Mike Rogers outed Ed Schrock from VA weeks before the 2004 election and Schrock bowed out. On his blog, Rogers brags about how he released the information purposely to affect the election.
I believe we are seeing that again. Unfortunately, it appears to be at the expense of innocent kids.
16
posted on
10/03/2006 6:53:56 AM PDT
by
Pete
To: areafiftyone
What difference does it make if the Dims knew? They didnt make Foley do it. They are not in charge of anything. They didnt have responsibility other than moral one and who would expect much from a Dim on that. Hastert and the leadership should have done a better job of watching the henhouse and then responding to this crisis. Having LaHood suggest that maybe they needed to abolish the Page Program because the members were too sick to be trusted was exactly the wrong thing to say.
17
posted on
10/03/2006 6:56:26 AM PDT
by
Dave S
To: areafiftyone
What difference does it make if the Dims knew? They didnt make Foley do it. They are not in charge of anything. They didnt have responsibility other than moral one and who would expect much from a Dim on that. Hastert and the leadership should have done a better job of watching the henhouse and then responding to this crisis. Having LaHood suggest that maybe they needed to abolish the Page Program because the members were too sick to be trusted was exactly the wrong thing to say.
18
posted on
10/03/2006 6:56:27 AM PDT
by
Dave S
To: PghBaldy
I sent it to DRUDGE but of course he ignores most of the stuff that is sent to him. I doubt he will post it on his website because its from a blog site.
19
posted on
10/03/2006 7:00:37 AM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
To: areafiftyone
he has posted or deleted items (that needed updating) when I've sent him stuff. It just depends I guess. If reports are true, all of this may be bumped by North Korea, which is threatening to test a nuke. Keep trying. I also sent it to various Fox journos, talk radio people, bloggers etc. It takes a while for everyone to learn what's going on, since it all has happened so fast.
20
posted on
10/03/2006 11:52:15 AM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(" Surrender NANCY!" What did you and other Dem leaders know and when about Foley???)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson