Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Why didn't the Democrats do something in 2004?
1 posted on 10/03/2006 5:38:38 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: areafiftyone

The polls were telling them they didn't need to in '04.


2 posted on 10/03/2006 5:42:22 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
"IF HE CRUISES YOU IN THE BATHROOMS ...."

What a romantic lifestyle...

3 posted on 10/03/2006 5:42:33 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

They were hard up for dates too, and thought Foley would do in a pinch.


4 posted on 10/03/2006 5:43:44 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Aravosis specifically asserted that Foley is gay on his Web site

How could Foley be "gay on a website"? Either he is gay, or not.

(Poor writing gripe... Sorry, my mom was an English teacher)

5 posted on 10/03/2006 5:54:45 AM PDT by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Hmmmmm.


14 posted on 10/03/2006 6:15:44 AM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

I wish this were seen by many people. It is a great post.


15 posted on 10/03/2006 6:52:57 AM PDT by PghBaldy (" Surrender NANCY!" What did you and other Dem leaders know and when about Foley???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Why didn't the Democrats do something in 2004?

They did. Mike Rogers outed Ed Schrock from VA weeks before the 2004 election and Schrock bowed out. On his blog, Rogers brags about how he released the information purposely to affect the election.

I believe we are seeing that again. Unfortunately, it appears to be at the expense of innocent kids.

16 posted on 10/03/2006 6:53:56 AM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

What difference does it make if the Dims knew? They didnt make Foley do it. They are not in charge of anything. They didnt have responsibility other than moral one and who would expect much from a Dim on that. Hastert and the leadership should have done a better job of watching the henhouse and then responding to this crisis. Having LaHood suggest that maybe they needed to abolish the Page Program because the members were too sick to be trusted was exactly the wrong thing to say.


17 posted on 10/03/2006 6:56:26 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

What difference does it make if the Dims knew? They didnt make Foley do it. They are not in charge of anything. They didnt have responsibility other than moral one and who would expect much from a Dim on that. Hastert and the leadership should have done a better job of watching the henhouse and then responding to this crisis. Having LaHood suggest that maybe they needed to abolish the Page Program because the members were too sick to be trusted was exactly the wrong thing to say.


18 posted on 10/03/2006 6:56:27 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beaversmom

ping


23 posted on 10/03/2006 2:42:00 PM PDT by onef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmeriBrit

fyi...


27 posted on 10/03/2006 9:04:00 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson