Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUmmie FUnnies 06-30-06 ("What should be done if Dems screw up and lose 06 too?")
DUmmie FUnnies ^ | June 30, 2006 | DUmmies and PJ-Comix

Posted on 06/30/2006 4:36:38 AM PDT by PJ-Comix

It's a sure thing that the Democrats are going to win big in the November congressional elections, right? I mean the media keeps reassuring the Leftists that they will win in a huge landslide in November, thus delivering the House and Senate to Democrat hands. That is the conventional liberal wisdom. In fact most Democrats are already jubilantly celebrating the victory that MUST happen. But what IF the Democrats LOSE in November despite assurances to the contrary? From reading the DUmmie answers in this THREAD titled, "What should be done if Dems screw up and lose 06 too?" it won't be a pretty sight. Revolution in the streets is mostly what the DUmmies threaten although it is hard to imagine they would get much further than the hallway just outside Mommy's computer room. So let us now watch the DUmmies ponder the horrible prospect of maybe losing in November in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, thinking of renting the "Wild In The Streets" video, is in the [brackets]:

What should be done if Dems screw up and lose 06 too?

[According to your poll, 56% of the DUmmies answered: "Time for a revoltion."]

I am sincerely hoping they win, and they have made some steps toward actually standing for something including pulling out of Iraq. Nonetheless, it's not hard to imagine them throwing away a potential easy victory through timidity, or boldness followed by an apology, or a GOP opponent correctly pointing out all the times that a Democrat now critical of Bush voted with the fascists over the last couple of years.

[It's not hard to imagine the DUmmies going BERSERK if you lose...again.]

Kerry essentially made the election close enough for Bush to steal by not being blunter about the war and critical of Bush to his face when he had a chance during the debates and couldn't be edited to pieces by Fox News. By fall of 2004, it was not only obvious Bush lied about the reasons he invaded Iraq, but the real reasons could have easily been pointed out since he gave the oil concessions in Iraq to his cronies who were screwing us at the pump, and of course, the Abu Ghraib scandal had broken out the previous spring, and documents showed Bush and top cabinet officials approved of those uncontestable war crimes. Kerry's quick concession in the face of vote rigging and vote fraud may have been pragmatically correct, but nonetheless dispirited those who put a lot of energy into campaigning for him.

[Kerry's quick concession provided us with the hilarious spectacle of DUmmies "standing up" online in unison and revealing their real names in a really FUnnie Drama Queen moment.]

If Democrats hold back again, what should be done?

[Implosion is a definite option.]

If neither Democratic nor Republican leaders have an answer, then there is no answer the government can offer to the people. It is then up to the people to decide whether it should let that continue or formulate an answer of their own.

[A roundabout way of calling for Bolshevik Revolution.]

take to the streets to protest the election fraud cuz that is the only way it's gonna happen.

[Declare fraud and then go BERSERK!]

Revolution the only realistic choice. Not with guns or protests in the streets, but by banding together the progressive states and forming a new country free of religious bigotry. Leave Jesusland to the Falwell Fundies (Bush can be president for life).

[A bit of unintended DUmmie irony. Form a country free of religious bigotry...where the "fundies" are banned.]

The Democratic caucus isn't about to screw up. They will take one or both Houses. If they don't, the elections were stolen, and that's quite different from "screwing up."

[The DUmmies already coming up with their excuses. The ONLY way the Democrats can lose is via fraud.]

I'm worried that the Dems at the national level are doing the same thing. They want to win, but if someone greases their palm to look away from an issue like electronic voting, they will do so.

[Karl Rove is at this very moment greasing the palms of corrupt Democrats to look the other way while he preprograms the Diebold machines.]

Eventually, people will erupt if they are continually ignored.

[Replace "people" with "DUmmies" and you would be correct.]

the only way they can lose is electronic voting machine fraud

[That was DUmmie AtomicKitten of DIEBOLD DEFACING fame.]

Stop looking to the Dems for change and join a third party. Work in that third party to make it a real viable alternative to the one party system we are reapidly approaching.

[The Socialist Workers Party is looking for new comrades.]

I'm personally 100% for a revolution at this point.

[Unfortunely a large pizza carton is blocking your basement doorway exit out to the real world.]

like they did in Russia after coup against Gorbachev or in the movie V for Vendetta. They put soldiers in the position of deciding whether to kill their family and neighbors, or side with them, and they chose correctly. Since we have less of a tradition of authoritarianism here, I have no doubt that American troops would respond correctly.

[Yeah, even though the DUmmies are constantly smearing the troops and harrassing military recruiters, the military are somehow going to be so deluded as to join your leftist cause. Got any more FUnnie delusions?]

As long as Americans can shop at Costco, finance new Cadillacs or flat screen TVs, and pick any one of the 500 pairs of socks available at just about any department store in town, don't go looking for the tanks to be rolling on DC anytime soon.

[Killjoy!]

Dissolve the Democratic Party. I've seen the Democrats blow the elections in 1980, 1988, 2000, and 2004. Last chance...

[And 1994 when you lost the House in a landslide, never to regain it back since.]

we need a secret organization (more likely a secret order, like Opus Dei or the Bene Gesserit in DUNE), devoted to figuring out how to find the weaknesses in those who're raking in all those corporate excess profits, _and ways to siphon it away from them_. And then to doing so.

[Bank robbery is what it is called.]

Get in the streets. Big time protests. And I don't think that will happen until the economy tanks. So, for me, it may be retirement to Panama. And hope the ice melt in Greenland doesn't flood our new island home. No wonder I've been having nightmares.

[Of course your new Panamanian island home will be flooded by Global Warming. It is inevitable according to Al Gore.]


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: 2006; dummies; election2006
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last
To: PJ-Comix
Revolution the only realistic choice. Not with guns or protests in the streets, but by banding together the progressive states and forming a new country free of religious bigotry. Leave Jesusland to the Falwell Fundies (Bush can be president for life).

Are the DUmmies aware that most of the missile silos are in red states? :)

121 posted on 06/30/2006 9:34:11 PM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
or in the movie V for Vendetta. They put soldiers in the position of deciding whether to kill their family and neighbors, or side with them, and they chose correctly.

Anyone looking for a reason why the dummies are doomed again need only look at that "logic"--they did it in a movie, so it'll work out just fine in real life.

I mean, this is a new low of ignorance even for them, but perfectly in keeping with their "wish hard enough, don't worry about thinking or working, and it'll happen!" philosophy.

122 posted on 06/30/2006 9:37:20 PM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Never EVER post Bluto's Animal House rant about the Germans bombing Pearl Harbor.

You'll be given a history lesson you'll never forget -- especially on large threads, where you'll get the same post from several posters that don't read all previous posts....

;o)

123 posted on 07/01/2006 1:07:47 AM PDT by Watery Tart (Well, by definition it's hard to get suicide bombers with experience. -–Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Armedanddangerous
Where does the Karl Rove weather machine come into play here?

Color me confused. I know it has SOME part to play.

Ssshhhhh! He's been using BOTH of them lately! Resistance is futile. Confusion is the intended effect!



124 posted on 07/01/2006 1:16:52 AM PDT by Watery Tart (Well, by definition it's hard to get suicide bombers with experience. -–Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
By fall of 2004, it was not only obvious Bush lied about the reasons he invaded Iraq, but the real reasons could have easily been pointed out since he gave the oil concessions in Iraq to his cronies who were screwing us at the pump....

Army contract for Feinstein's husband
Blum is a director of firm that will get up to $600 million

Fron SFGate:

Tuesday, April 22, 2003

URS Corp., a San Francisco planning and engineering firm partially owned by California Sen. Dianne Feinstein's husband, landed an Army contract Monday worth up to $600 million.

The award to help with troop mobilization, weapons systems training and anti-terrorism efforts is the latest in a string of plum defense jobs snared by URS. In February, the firm won an army engineering and logistics contract that could bring in $3.1 billion during the next eight years.
Click for the rest of the article




125 posted on 07/01/2006 1:48:31 AM PDT by Watery Tart (Well, by definition it's hard to get suicide bombers with experience. -–Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Kerry essentially made the election close enough for Bush to steal by not being blunter about the war and critical of Bush to his face when he had a chance during the debates and couldn't be edited to pieces by Fox News.

John F'n Kerry's problem during the debates wasn't President Bush's "lies" or whatever. He problem was he never nailed down a position on ANY topic. His answer basicly reflected whatever the people wanted to hear.

In other words, he showed NO LEADERSHIP, NO POSITION, and NO GUTS!!!

126 posted on 07/01/2006 2:47:55 AM PDT by dirtbiker (I've tried to see the liberal point of view, but I couldn't get my head that far up my a$$....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
like they did in Russia after coup against Gorbachev...

Yeah, right after Gorby tried to RE-ESTABLISH totalitarian rule over the Russian people...

DUmmies are starting to get on my nerves with their blatant stupidity....

127 posted on 07/01/2006 2:51:39 AM PDT by dirtbiker (I've tried to see the liberal point of view, but I couldn't get my head that far up my a$$....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
"Well... okay... but: Superman II was ten years earlier than that, f'cryin' out loud. :)"

Neither of us have ever been fans of sci-fi (which is how I'd categorize Superman II). Westerns, war movies, mystery & musicals are my fare. And I agree with you on the death of musicals. As for The Quick And The Dead...well, let's leave it at that. The recent Western you didn't mention that merits attention is Open Range. Kostner & Duvall did fine work in it. Now, Duvall has another out - I forget the name - but I'm looking forward to seeing it when it's out on DVD.

128 posted on 07/01/2006 4:23:59 AM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" – Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: chesley
They're more philosophy and less economics than his other works. Conflict can be especially tough; it's mighty heavy on the abstract side.
129 posted on 07/01/2006 5:14:15 AM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

If the Dummies actually revolt and try to form a new country, does that mean I can shoot them? It seems to me the last attempt at civil war was a shooting conflict.


130 posted on 07/02/2006 10:07:06 AM PDT by Poser (Willing to fight for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Revolution the only realistic choice.

The DUmmies are revolting!

131 posted on 07/03/2006 12:34:27 PM PDT by steve-b ("Creation Science" is to the religous right what "Global Warming" is to the socialist left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson