Skip to comments.
Oil's New Ball Game
PanAsianBiz ^
| June 21, 2006
| Dr. Bill Belew
Posted on 06/24/2006 5:36:04 PM PDT by G. Stolyarov II
In the 1960s, 85% of the oil in the world was available for ownership, development, partnerships, and such. At the time, 14% of the oil reserves belonged to the Soviet Union.
Today it is the reverse of that: 16% of the world's oil is available. 65% is owned by the nations that possess the fields and 19% has limited access -- that is, nations, including Russia, will allow others to invest in and partially own their oil fields.
It's different now. And, shall we not forget there are some nations that will allow investment and development and then, when all is said and done, kick out the major investor?
The rules are different than they were 40 years ago.
Question: when will the world become less dependent on oil? How about exploring nuclear power again?
Nearly 80% of the energy in France comes from nuclear power. I reckon the French don't care at all what the rest of the world does with its oil.
Why can't other countries do that? Why not the US?
What do you think?
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; History; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: alternativefuels; dependence; economy; energy; fossilfuels; france; gas; nationalization; nuclear; nuclearpower; oil; privateenterprise; russia; scarcity; statism
Today the oil market is much more restricted than it used to be, because governments own the vast majority of the world's oil -- which puts those governments' private partners in constant danger of expropriation and political attacks. This artificial government-imposed scarcity of oil is indeed a reason for exploring alternative energy sources -- especially nuclear energy -- to overcome the barriers foreign governments erect against private oil extraction. Oil is not *naturally* scarce, but extensive government meddling in the oil industry makes it so. See Dr. Belew's blog at
PanAsianBiz
To: G. Stolyarov II
"It's different now. And, shall we not forget there are some nations that will allow investment and development and then, when all is said and done, kick out the major investor? "
It is not different, Mexico stole the oil fields of Americans in the thirties.
2
posted on
06/24/2006 5:49:34 PM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
To: G. Stolyarov II
because governments own the vast majority of the world's oil --Which is to say, it'll be mis-managed....at best.
3
posted on
06/24/2006 11:33:41 PM PDT
by
budwiesest
(I don't do that much diversity.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson