Posted on 02/26/2006 9:12:24 PM PST by ibme
The Official Death of the Theory of Evolution 2/25/2006
Theorem Name: The Illusion of Evolution DOA Theorem Note: This Theorem looks at the Theory of Evolution from a completely abstract point of view. The formulas and discussion are presented from an Evolutionist point of view. This doesnt necessarily represent the view of the author. AoU age of the Universe. (1) AoU = 10 billion = 10,000,000,000 years In the whole age of the Universe, there are only about 1 Trillion opportunities for something to evolve to a different state eventually Man. (this is very generous)(3) MM - Mega Millions Jackpot Odds In order to believe the Theory of Evolution, you have to believe the odds of going from Rock to Man are only 5,691 times greater than winning the Mega Millions Jackpot.
Note: If something is wrong with the math, please show me. The numbers are not presumed to be absolutely correct. You can play with the numbers. Throw in a few million here and there. No matter what numbers you consider, there arent enough reproductive life cycles in the projected age of the Universe to produce the simplest form of life.
Theorem: There are not enough reproductive life cycle generations available in the projected age of the Universe to allow even the most basic form of evolution.
AvRpdCyc - average reproductive life cycle generation (2)(3)
TotalRpdCyc total reproductive cycles in the age of the Universe.
AvRpdCyc = 100 per year (2)(3)
TotalRpdCyc = AoU * AvRpdCyc = 1,000,000,000,000 = 1 Trillion
MM = 175,711,536
TotalRpdCyc / MM = 1,000,000,000,000/175,711,536 = 5,691
Im taking into consideration that the Theory of Evolution is based on things moving from simple states to more complex. Some cells reproduce quickly. Mankind would be around 12 years at the best. (3)
Global flood?
Wow for someone who stands behind "scientific" claims, you sure have an unscientific way of proving things. You stated that basically all scientists worth their salt agree with evolution. I gave you a fairly long list of scientists who don't.
You disparage and denounce everyone of those, and yet you offer no proof to the contrary. You make broad generalizations about everyone of them. You expect me to prove things about them, and yet you yourself have given me baseless claims. I at least gave you some basis to my claim. And then you shoot down my side with generalizations that a democrat would use, without viable proof of your statement. (Are you a democrat?)
You don't agree with my view point and thats fine. But you made a pompous statement, and someone with an opposing view called you on it. I backed my view up with facts. And in your pompousness disregarded those facts because they didn't agree with your view, all the while never presenting any facts to discredit my facts, other than your bloviating imperious opinion.
You bore me with this nonsense
Excuse me, but, when "the lines broke" in the Battle of the Bulge, weren't the Germans headed for Antwerp?
that post (ichneumon's) is of archival quality
I thought they were busy bombing Pearl Harbor.
But not bigger than 1700
And your accreditation is????? HMMMMMM?????? * * *
Dr Henry M. Morris, Hydrologist
My list may be "short" compared to the millions of other scientists who don't believe in creationism. But its longer than what anybody else has offered.
Besides there are 6.5 billion (approx.) people on this earth to say that there are millions of scientists who oppose creationism might be just a weeeeeee bit of an over generalization.
Lastly, I'm assuming that you were asking what my accreditation is, for sarcasm purposes of course. Well I'm just an ordinary construction worker, with maybe a(and then again maybe not) slightly higher than average IQ. But I did sleep at a Holiday Inn once.
Besides, the point I was trying to make to someone else was that they made a very generalized statement with nothing at all to back it up. I was using a list of acredited individuals to back up mine. So my acredation doesn't matter.
As far as Dr. Morris, wow dead by 5 days. Like Maxwell Smart used to say "missed it by that much"
as a side-note: in the course of researching for a project, I have acquired a handbook on forensic human osteology.
I am learing a fair amount of the basics of sexual dimorphisms *and* racially distinct morphologies.
I find it amusing that creationists believe that "the math proves" evolution cannot happen, while at the same time *insist* that the racially distinct morphologies arose from a single reproductive pair (not P generation, a PAIR) and three individual sons.
the genetic differences required to produce heritable traits such as prognathism and nasal guttering vs. orthagnathism and a nasal sill (for two minor morphological differences) could not *possibly* arise in a single generation.
That's just *one* set of differences, out of literally hundreds - don't get me started on the os innominata...
Wow good comeback on that. Did your mommy help you think that one up? Maybe Al Gore?
Your the one who chimed in on this. Next time you decide to be a little pompous, don't go running away, saying how bored you are, like this is all beneath you.
You really do remind me of Al Gore. And I don't think we've ever even met.
You just want to argue Ichy.. You know we live on different planets.. You could care less what I believe.. I know where you are coming from, more or less, you would have become "born again" to vaguely understand me.. I know that.. So I accept you on that level.. And you accept me as a Moonbat.. Thats the way its supposed to be.. Everything is just the way its supposed to be.. The Sheep MUST be separated from the goats.. and they ARE.. I'm O.K. wid dat..
Ugh OH!.. I feel a prayer rising up from within me.. I'm grabbing the arms of my chair.. HERE IT COMES>>>.
Wait until you get into the teeth! Then you'll have some fun.
It certainly is. But I can't neatly fit it into any category in The List-O-Links. We'll have to depend on Ichneumon to keep track of it so he can haul it out -- or link to it -- as needed.
One flew over the spell checker.
200
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.