Posted on 01/27/2006 11:04:17 AM PST by Lindykim
Greek mythology tells the tale of Prometheus, a Titan who envied Zeus his godlike powers. Driven by his covetousness, he stole some of Zeus's power, then was caught and punished by being tied to a rock. The underlying assumption of this myth is that man and God are antagonists. Man covets godlike powers, but since God refuses to share any of his power, man must take it---or steal it.
In ancient pagan civilizations, Promethean men were able to give free reign to the dark impulses that urged them to become as 'gods.' Although they lacked the ability to create life, they exercised complete control over all matters of life and death. They could dictate who was a free-man with rights and who was a lesser being—an animated tool or animated sex toy—with no rights whatsoever. Promethean man was absolute sovereign and lawmaker. His lusts, jealousies, dark impulses---all became law if he so chose them to be.
It was Biblical religion, and more specifically the Genesis account of creation, that overthrew the classic pagan worldview model with its all-powerful State controlled by totalitarian god-like Promethean men. All of this was repugnant to the Biblical model wherein the Genesis account proclaimed God as Sovereign and Lawmaker. It was He who had created all men and no one was to enslave other men or to treat them as 'lesser beings." Neither were His children to be 'subsumed' into nature, for He had given all of His children dominion over the earth, and they could own land and make use of the earth's resources. In America's founding documents, all statements about equality and freedom as inalienable and inherent rights of all human persons have their basis in the Genesis account. Similarly, because our lives are precious to our Creator, we have the right to keep and bear arms in order to protect our lives and those of our loved ones. This view of man and the world was totally alien to the ancient pagan way of doing things.
However, not everyone was pleased with the Biblical model. While all of the former 'lesser beings' were delighted to be free of their oppressors, Promethean men were not happy campers. Thus it was that a group of Enlightenment conspirators, two of whom were Frederick Engel's and Karl Marx, who by temperament was Promethean, devised an ideology based on ancient communal living (communism). Their scheme was to overthrow Western Christian-Judeo civilization and to reconstitute society on the basis of their ideology. What they needed, but lacked, to make their system into a bona-fide worldview was a creation account.
All major civilizations throughout the history of the world began with a creation account which told man where he came from, how he got here, why he is here, and what's wrong with man and the world. The creation account is the authoritative foundation which animates and supports the divine orders (natural laws) that lay down the law for both human and natural order.
Perhaps it was at this point that Screwtape began to choreograph events by steering Marx to Darwin's book. For it was in Darwin's 'Origin of Species' that the conspirators happily discovered the black magic key that would allow them to believe they could steal God's power. After Marx read Darwin's book, he wrote to Engel's and said, "…although it is developed in the crude English style, this is the book which contains the basis in natural history for our view." (Source: "Gods that Fail: Peter Singer and the Darwinian Left," review by Eric Jones).
Marx and Engel's incorporated Darwin's theory into their communist ideology. The synthesized version became 'scientific dialectical materialism." It was in this manner that the two conspirators transformed their ideology into 'absolute scientific truth."
The creation story they gained, and by which they declared the 'death of God,' must have been authored by Screwtape thus for obvious reasons, they preferred to keep it out of the limelight. It essentially states: "In the beginning was non-life bearing, non-intelligence bearing matter which, with neither rhyme nor reason, accidentally self-created by virtue of an accidentally caused quantum fluctuation, which had likewise mysteriously self-created for no purpose nor reason." The moral of this story is: Never make deals with Screwtape---he has a devilish sense of humor.
Trumpeting the death of God, Promethean's calling themselves "Darwinian scientists' immediately set about the business of abolishing mankind. With glee born of darkest envy, they stripped him of his soul, free will and conscience, and then declared that he was but a mechanistic monkey-man. Or in Herr Scientist Frederick Engel's words: "Darwin has given us an approximate description of these ancestors of ours. They were completely covered with hair…had beards…pointed ears and they lived in bands in trees." (www.newyouth.com)
Thus was the world forcefully thrust into Screwtape's "Age of Scientism," wherein Darwinian communists—the animated tools of Screwtape and his hellish minions-- unleashed rivers of human blood on a planetary dimension---all in pursuit of producing scientifically engineered Un-man and a Promethean Utopia.
In observation of the scientifically-induced hellish madness unleashed onto the world, "The Black Book of Communism" offers the following insights and indictments:
"…the roots of Marxist-Leninism are…not to be found in Marx at all, but in a deviant version of Darwinism…Crimes against humanity are the product of an ideology that reduces people…to a…condition, be it ideological, racial, or sociohistorical." (pg. 752)
"…transformation of ideology and politics into absolute 'scientific' truth is the basis of the totalitarianism dimension of Communism. The party answered only to science. Science…justified the terror by requiring that all aspects of social and individual life be transformed." (pg. 739)
"This biological or zoological strain of thinking enables us to understand…why so many crimes of Communism were crimes against humanity and how Marxist-Leninist ideology managed to justify these crimes to its followers." (pg. 751)
On page 4, are these grim statistics:
USSR: 20 million deaths China: 65 million deaths Vietnam: 1 million deaths N. Korea: 2 million deaths E. Europe: 1 million deaths Latin America: 150,000 Africa: 1.7 million deaths
The total approaches 100 million 'animalized' humans shot, gassed, burned, electrocuted, starved, gunned down, beaten to death, impaled, beheaded or otherwise murdered under the authority of 'absolute science.'
The soul and life destroying "biological and zoological strain" of madness is at this very moment poisoning and warping the minds of Americans and being force-fed to our children. Our children are being made to view themselves through Lucifer's "burning eye of envy" in Darwinist textbooks. "You are an animal and share a common heritage with earthworms." (Source: Johnson, "Biology" as quoted in Norris Anderson "Education or Indoctrination? Analysis of Textbooks in Alabama, 1995, pg. 6)
The anti-human totalitarianism and Promethean megalomania comes through loud and clear in Thomas C. Clark's odious assertions in "Crime and Causality: Do Killers Deserve to Die?" Keep in mind that Clark, who doesn't view himself as an ape, is obnoxiously lecturing all of the lesser beings whom he believes to be mechanistic monkeys. What he's saying in his pompous gasbag manner is that since "God is dead" and we are but human apes, it's time we accept our fate to become subsumed (embedded) into nature. Naturally his Darwinian-induced thimble-wittedness is hee-hawed under the authority of absolute science: "Many have resisted, and will continue to resist, the epistemic authority of science, since it requires we abandon those beloved conceptions of freedom, dignity, and moral agency and responsibility in which persons are understood to be causally privileged over the rest of nature…science proposes naturalized…conceptions of freedom, and responsibility which embed persons…fully within the causal network" (www.naturalism.org) If Darwinian scientism was a road atlas, it would ever lead to but one destination…Hell. If it was a multipurpose set of building instructions, they would ever build but one thing…Hell.
Dr. T. N. Tahmision (Atomic Energy Commission USA) pegged Darwinian evolutionists as 'con men." He commented, "Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution, we do not have one iota of fact." ('The Fresno Bee," Aug. 20, 1959, as quoted by N.J. Mitchell, "Evolution and the Emperor's New Clothes," 1983, title page)
Even after the passage of more than two thousand years, we can see that Prometheus has yet to grow up. Still ruled by Narcissus and the dark passions of envy, covetousness, hatred and vengeance-seeking which she so adroitly keeps aflame, Prometheus remains doomed as a result to serve as Screwtape's 'animated tool."
" I've already pointed out a connection which Marx himself pointed out."
And I have asked for specifics as to where communist ideology has taken natural selection and descent with modification as parts of their ideology. And you still have not explained how Darwin influenced Marx in 1848 with a book that appeared in 1859.
That would be a neat trick, since Marx wrote and published "The Communist Manifeso" a few years *before* Darwin had ever published anything on evolution. So did Marx have a time machine, or are all of you "evolution inspired communism" folks just grossly ignorant and straining for cheap excuses to attack a field of science you happen not to like?
I hate to mention this, Lindykim, but the link for this does not go to the newspaper, but to a user page on some internet host.
I'm just wondering why. Was this article in a newspaper? If so, why did you not link to the newspaper?
The time sequences the publishing of the ideations. The ideas themselves? They sure look that they arose contemporaneously in the same idea-pool of Europoean intellectual culture of the era. Afterall, it was a stress-ful era, we'd expect new species of ideations out of it, would we not?
Granted, I understand the timeline. If true, it seems that Marx could not have read Origen of Species before writing his book.
However, it does not seem possible that there is NO connection between evolution and marxism as Marx himself says in the quote that evolutionary ideas are the basis of natural history for his views.
Yes indeed, it raises alarm bells over the shoddy state of science education which produced someone so grossly uninformed as yourself, able to make such bizarrely cartoonish misrepresentations of biology as the kind you just made, so grossly misinformed that most gradeschool children would know better.
Even Darwin himself explained the fallacy of this in his 1859 book -- it never ceases to amaze me when creationists are over 130+ years behind on their education.
Not in the "air", CG, in the genes. In the idea-pool genes.
> it does not seem possible that there is NO connection between evolution and marxism as Marx himself says in the quote that evolutionary ideas are the basis of natural history for his views.
Here's a thought: maybe Marx was *lying*?
"Because she wrote it and tried to pretend it came from a newspaper. This is a vanity/blog."
That's what I figured. On checking the place she cited, but didn't link to isn't even a newspaper. It's a blog by some guy named Daley.
This is darned annoying. I've clicked Report Abuse and explained the problem. I'm sure the mods will be right along to move this somewhere out of the News topics.
Well, I'm not speaking to Darwin, so much as I am to a recent publication that spoke of built-up micro-mutations that only show themself in a population during times of stress when suddenly -- punctuated equilibrium-wise, mege-step-wise -- a new species pops out of the egg.
I knew what you meant. It's still horse manure. :)
Excellent piece. I admire your courage. There are few people who are more abusive than the pro-evolution crowd, so you have to have a thick skin to write something like that. Michael Moore is a pauper compared with that bunch. But I think you are exactly right about the effects of Darwinism, and its true source. No philosophy or religion has ever done as much damage to man's psyche, or his respect for his fellow man, as Darwinism has.
Making an issue out of the link evidences your desperation.
Here's the link (which you could've found very easily----if you had really wanted to).
http://www.times-post.com/
You deny that ideas evolve?
Look, Marx was a communist, and an author of communist trash (the Manifesto, etc.) before Darwin disclosed his theory of evolution to the world.
"Making an issue out of the link evidences your desperation."
You screwed up, not us. And this is YOUR writing; it should not be in news.
And it's junk. :)
No, avoiding expressing your opinion in response to a question is considered being coy.
I believe all life on earth evolves from a lower form to a higher one.
How about you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.