Private Atheist Schools For Darwinians

If Intelligent Design cannot be taught because it is non scientific and only based on personal experience, why should Evolution (Cosmic or Biologic) be rammed down the young skulls of mush when ET itself is based on the personal experiences of so many scientists? ET people have no transitional forms, experiments, or observations proving their 18 billion years of accidental history is any more than a very subjectively devised theory. Many of these scientists, and Judge Jones, are good Lutherans on Sunday, but by Monday - they must deny Almighty God as nonaccidental Creator. In this way they can appear before mere men claiming to be part of the great atheist intelligentsia, which promises social and collegiate tenure. And, I think we all know what universities are about nowadays - extreme, God forsaken socialism.

Those believers who try to compromise by thinking that God, via a Big Bang, initiated Cosmic Evolution, which leads to Micro Evolution, have been swept away by the ET atheist jargon which does not permit the belief in any God.
Science cannot prove there is a God, and science cannot prove there is no God. Much of science is based on man's senses. If most men sense that there is a Divine Being, who are scientists to say that there is no provable evidence when we have such overwhelming testimony of God's existence?
Judge Jones would take circumstantial evidence in so many other cases, why not this one?
Scientists who do not sense a God may be simply retarded for not using all of their God given senses. Or, they simply want to keep their jobs which demand that they be atheists. Psalm 10 - The heavens are telling the glory of God; the firmament proclaims God's handiwork.

The ET nitpickers will ask, "Which God?" I say, "Pick One - preferably before you die: at least you are admitting to the existence of a deity, Who should not be denounced by your science." You will have to face Him some day, and it is far better to be embarrassed before men than Almighty God. Who in their right mind would say, "I cannot admit to the existence of god because my science will not permit it?" At least Evolutionist textbooks should allow their authors to add disclaimers such as "I personally believe in the existence of Intelligent Design, yet I cannot prove it." Who wants an atheist teaching anything? Would he or she not be biased in how or what they teach - as atheists?
One good example is "America's Radio Doctor" - atheist Dean Edell, who most of the time is prescribing promiscuity to heal what ails you. Can't trust him.

Since Federal Judge Jones of Pennsylvania has distinguished himself as an intellectual because he has decided to be a Lutheran who believes there is no scientific proof of God, a new public school alternative must be afforded to parents who do not want any hint of the existence of God taught to their children. Private Atheist Schools are the answer.

A very small percentage of people believe that there is no God - as "proven" by cosmic and biologic evolution - and they should be allowed to pay for such Private Atheist Schools just as Christian and Jewish believers have been told that in order to be taught a divine morality they must be sent to religious schools - all the while they are taxed for anti-god public schools.

So many evolutionists will not recant of their non scientific heresies because there are a lot of jobs riding on the perpetuation of the RD myth - Random Design theory. University professors and journalists, just to name a few, who slam those "stupid creationists" for their belief that none of what exists today could be accidental, will be seen as a Galileo who once had it right (heliocentricity:creationism), but then buckled under to the status quo.

The anti science loopholes in evolution will be studied now more than ever before. Science loves trends and fashions. It cannot exist on the old [The advent of a global cooling announced in the 1970's was replaced by global warming based on only 200 years of temperature-taking]. Since Cosmic and Darwinian evolution has pretty much bored most people to death, it is now time for capricious scientists to refresh their image. Believe in God you infidels, for God's sake.

OK, maybe this will stir things up if I sling a little mud around. This is about one of my own favorite deluvium events.

ABSTRACT: The top of the terminal Cretaceous (- Paleocene) regressive deposits of the Iberian Range (boundary with the AlmazÃ¡n Basin) a sedimentary discontinuity marked by incipient karstification and, mostly, by alteration of the carbonate subtratum and generation of complex layers of edaphic caliches is described. Weathering was promoted by meteoric waters near the discontinuity and resulted in several processes: dedolomitization, micritization and organic activity around roots. Milimetric to decimetric-sized cavities filled up with crusts (speleothems), detrital carbonate sediments and terra rosa witness karstification. Isolate or alternating massive (croÃ»te en dalle, massive hardpan) and laminated (croÃ»te zonaire, laminar hardpan) caliches are found both on top and inside the substratum. Four microtructures can be recognized: {a) crumbly, {b) intergrain aggregate, (c} single grain structure, (d) vertical or horizontally laminated, which can form gradual transition of the type a - b - c. Locally also crumbly-fenestral microstructures are found. Distinguishing features of these edaphic caliches include the abundance of pedorelicts, ooids. peloids, ubiquitous in situ Microcodiun and root tubules with associated calcite meedles and alveolar texture. Vadose diagenesis is inferred from a variety of features such as porosity in flat voids due to deliccation, gravitational and meniscus cementation with a complex succession of encrustig phases. During the time-span corresponding to the development of the discontinuity a warm climate with progressive reduction of rain is assumed from the various features observed and the substitution of karstic by caliche-forming processes.

Many of these scientists, and Judge Jones, are good Lutherans on Sunday, but by Monday - they must deny Almighty God as nonaccidental Creator.

indeed!

Most Christians 'believe' Evolution because they do NOT know what their Bible says. If, as they say, they 'believe' the words of Jesus and then of the New Testament writers, they have to decide what the following verses mean:

Romans 5:12-21
12. Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because all sinned--
13. for before the law was given, sin was in the world. But sin is not taken into account when there is no law.
14. Nevertheless, death reigned from the time of Adam to the time of Moses, even over those who did not sin by breaking a command, as did Adam, who was a pattern of the one to come.
15. But the gift is not like the trespass. For if the many died by the trespass of the one man, how much more did God's grace and the gift that came by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ, overflow to the many!
16. Again, the gift of God is not like the result of the one man's sin: The judgment followed one sin and brought condemnation, but the gift followed many trespasses and brought justification.
17. For if, by the trespass of the one man, death reigned through that one man, how much more will those who receive God's abundant provision of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man, Jesus Christ.
18. Consequently, just as the result of one trespass was condemnation for all men, so also the result of one act of righteousness was justification that brings life for all men.
19. For just as through the disobedience of the one man, the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man the many will be made righteous.
20. The law was added so that the trespass might increase. But where sin increased, grace increased all the more,
21. so that, just as sin reigned in death, so also grace might reign through righteousness to bring eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

If there were no one man, that means SIN did NOT enter the World thru him.

If Adam was NOT the one man, that means SPIRITUAL DEATH did not come thru him.

If SIN did NOT enter the World thru the one man, that means Jesus does not save from SIN.

Are we to believe that the one man is symbolic? Does that mean Jesus is symbolic as well?

The Theory of Evolution states that there WAS no one man, but a wide population that managed to inherit that last mutated gene that makes MEN different from APES.

1 Timothy 2:13

For Adam was formed first, then Eve. Was Paul WRONG about this???

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.