Skip to comments.Iraq - Democrats Lied About WMDs
Posted on 11/03/2005 6:14:35 AM PST by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Jan - this may shed some additional light on our conversation last night. Check out all the links.
I also use these...
Which is probably why there are not 100 posts 30 minutes after this thread was put up.
I think no matter what Bush said, says, or will say the Dem's will controvert it.
We as a group know what the President said, was true. The evidence is all over the internet.
When they played back all the statements from the Dems on Fox news yesterday saying Sadam was a threat. Now they say I did not say that. BUSH LIED. Billary is the worst of them all.
I beleive in my President !!
Where is this group??? They/we should be shouting this information every minute of everyday.
I've seen far too many here side with the commies, saying President Bush lied. This thread has been up an hour and there are only 5 posts. Disgusting.
The Group I am speaking of is the Free Republic.
And yes I noticed the lack of response. I am sorry about that but, I shout it all the time. Too many Dem's in Maryland don't like to hear me.
Now if only the Republicans would make a very public noise about it!
Rush made a very long speech on this just yesterday.
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- In a major victory for the White House, the Senate early Friday voted 77-23 to authorize President Bush to attack Iraq if Saddam Hussein refuses to give up weapons of mass destruction as required by U.N. resolutions. Hours earlier, the House approved an identical resolution, 296-133. The president praised the congressional action, declaring "America speaks with one voice." "The Congress has spoken clearly to the international community and the United Nations Security Council," Bush said in a statement. "Saddam Hussein and his outlaw regime pose a grave threat to the region, the world and the United States. Inaction is not an option, disarmament is a must."http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/10/11/iraq.us/
We elected our leaders to represent us.
They sent our troops to war. In reality, every one of us sent them there.
Saddam had WMD, we know that as a fact. The only question is "Where did they go." The burden of proof was on him to prove he no longer had them. WHen he didn't comply, we went in (remember, all Reagan declared was a "cease fire.")
We simply finished a job that nobody else had the guts to do. And now that the "oil for food" info is out- we know why. Ask any soldier how many NEW Russian and French weapons we found over there...
Richard Miniter has a new book out about the WMDs actually found and I agree that FrontPage has done a great job exposing these Commie-crats for who they are and what they said. Also, David Horowitz maintains DiscoverTheNetworks which exposes a lot of these issues very well.
Thank you for serving our country. I did happen to see a recent reference to this book but cannot remember where. A "friend" of mine actually was with the contingent that conducted some interviews and reviewed intelligence gleaned from captured terrorists. There have been a few (not enough) people in the conservative press that have mentioned this "Ghost Caravan" led by the Russians to Syria, which I have no doubt that they (the Ruskies) did. Who, other than the Chinese and the French, had as much of a vested interest in Saddam's regime than one of their major weapons suppliers?
The Goverment has stated that they were moved just before we went to Iraq into Syria and Iran. Of coarse you don't hear that anymore. Then Iran saying this week they have nuclear capability. Do the Dem's think this is all fiction and fabrication?
Has Dr. Khidhr Hamza told the US this?
The GOP-controlled Senate added an amendment to the $440-billion military spending bill that would extend to spies, terrorists, and Islamic jihadists the same rights U.S. citizens enjoy under the Constitution.
In other words, our military interrogators can no longer question suspected suicide bombers and murderers of women and children without the ACLU looking over their shoulder -- ready to haul some poor enlisted man into court just because he yelled at a terrorist or hurt a terrorists feelings.
If the Senate had done such a despicable thing during World War II, the American people would have stormed the Capitol, tarred and feathered all who voted for such treachery, and ridden them out of town on a rail.
This evil, suicidal bill if implemented would expose Americans to the greatest danger in the history of our nation: The planting of explosives on our subways. Suicide bombers killing American women and children. Airline hijackings. Assassinations.
Do you realize that not a single terrorist attack has occurred on American soil since 9/11 despite the dark, dire predictions of the political know-it-alls.
You know why? Because our worldwide intelligence operation has discovered and exposed plot after plot to kill Americans, both abroad and at home.
You may be alive today because some interrogator wasnt too fastidious about how he got his information from some proud, smirking jihadist.
Can anyone confirm this?
If this is true, we are in worse shape than I imagined, and I'm going to start flying my flag upside down..
the symbol for dire distress..yes it is a Federal Code..
I think I'll study on that exception for awhile..do you mean homicide, or murder?
Is a perceived threat of eminent force or bodily harm an exception to the exception?
I read through your post and am for ONCE...speechless!
I have to research this. Whatever are we thinking?
Is this a way to say we are at war?...NOT!!
This will not stand..it is un-constitutional..un-American..and really pisses me off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.