Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush misses another opportunity to nominate a Hispanic to the Supreme Court
http://www.lulac.org/advocacy/press/2005/alito.html ^ | Oct. 31, 2005 | Brenda Alvarez

Posted on 11/02/2005 6:27:20 PM PST by television is just wrong

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: ElPatriota
Next one will be a Black or Hispanic woman... so cheer up lady.

He could nominate either of those types and IT WOULDN'T COUNT. Their ethnicity disappears if they're conservative. I'm sure you've figured that out by now.

41 posted on 11/02/2005 6:56:07 PM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
A Hispanic Scotus would put light on the mexican border..

last thing Bush needs is light on the mexican border.. thats why there IS NONE...

and IF some public attention(media) wanders towards toward the border.. the administration will do "something" "anything" to get off.. The mexican insurgency IS ON PURPOSE..

42 posted on 11/02/2005 6:57:22 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
I was hoping he would nominate a one legged midget!!

Pray for W and Our Troops

43 posted on 11/02/2005 6:57:53 PM PST by bray (Iraq, freed from Saddamn now Pray for Freedom from Mohammad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

America made a big mistake when it started rewarding people for their ethnicity,especially if they were a minority.If it continues down this path the country will lose its identity and become the boiling pot instead of the melting pot.


44 posted on 11/02/2005 6:58:52 PM PST by rdcorso (There Is No Such Thing As A Neutral Person During A War With Radical Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

Well, all is not lost. If you take a look at the ages of remaining members of the Supremes, it's Ginsburg - 72, Souter - 66, Thomas - 57, Breyer - 67, Scalia - 69, Stevens - 85, Kennedy - 69. So, here we have Judge Stevens, probably the most liberal judge on the court at 85 years; obviously there's a strong (dare I say good?) chance that Bush will have the opportunity to fill his position within the next three years. However, I am still pulling for the first black woman judge - that would be Judge Janice Rogers Brown, yes it would, let's rumble!!!


45 posted on 11/02/2005 7:00:01 PM PST by snoringbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

Excuse me everyone, a minute, gotta find my keys to start the WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMBULANCE!


46 posted on 11/02/2005 7:05:28 PM PST by Mrs. Shawnlaw (Rock beats scissors, don't run with rocks. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
...He could nominate either of those types and IT WOULDN'T COUNT. Their ethnicity disappears if they're conservative. I'm sure you've figured that out by now....

You are correct. But isnt't beautiful, that on our side, if nothing else, we try to look at the quality of the person rather than the color of their skin? - I personally forget about race when I am looking at the talented person regardless of their color (Asian, Hispanic, Black or any other minority), and if coservative..Ahh.. even better :)

47 posted on 11/02/2005 7:05:40 PM PST by ElPatriota (Let's not forget we are all still friends despite our differences :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

######Bush misses another opportunity to nominate a Hispanic to the Supreme Court######


I agree! I call upon Justice Stevens to retire immediately so that this oversight can be corrected. Justice Stevens is a committed proponent of affirmative action and racial quotas, so I'm certain he'd want to be replaced by someone who adds diversity to the Court. His immediate resignation would allow President Bush to appoint Miguel Estrada or Judge Garza to the highest court in the land. Since Justice Stevens in 85, he's surely ready to retire and enjoy his golden years, and what better way to do so than opening up a spot for Estrada or Garza. C'mon Stevens, step down now!


48 posted on 11/02/2005 7:05:55 PM PST by puroresu (Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

bitch-and-moan

the only Identity Politics that belong in America is American Identity. No others need apply.


49 posted on 11/02/2005 7:23:10 PM PST by King Prout (many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

The Court is not a diversity institution. It is meant to adhere to rule of law. Period.

This stated, if they wanted a Hispanic on the Court they should have helped us confirm Estrada to the Appellate Court.


50 posted on 11/02/2005 7:39:59 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
Bush has no asian americans on the supreme court.

Bush has no legally handicapped justices on the supreme court.

Let's see real minorities if we're gonna whine like a 4 year old in a toy store.

51 posted on 11/02/2005 7:40:08 PM PST by MrEdd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
Nevermind a qualified candidate, just certain racial background.

They would complain about whatever ethnic background the nominee did not have.

52 posted on 11/02/2005 7:41:32 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz

"He also missed the opportunity to nominate an Asian. Or a Serbian. Or a Methodist. Or a deaf person. Lots of opportunities missed, all because of the fact that he was pressured by the base to pick the most highly qualified candidate."

and a Native American,or someone in a wheel chair, or a blind person, or an openly gay judge or a really big fat person......


53 posted on 11/02/2005 10:13:20 PM PST by TET1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

don't forget gay and with one or two abortions... experience on resume you know


54 posted on 11/03/2005 11:25:15 AM PST by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

in that case, Transexuals and Turrets syndrom sufferers are under-represented as well.


55 posted on 11/03/2005 11:27:11 AM PST by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon
don't forget gay and with one or two abortions... experience on resume you know

Make that a lesbian who has performed abortions and she'd be unstoppable for confirmation to SCTOUS.

56 posted on 11/03/2005 11:39:02 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Confirm Judge Alito now. Yes I am an Alitist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead

LA RAZA, everything for the race nothing for those not of the race.


That is LaRAZA's byline


57 posted on 11/06/2005 1:21:48 AM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson