Zipper-hoisting aside, what has missus clinton accomplished in her lifetime? I see only destruction in her wake.
|
Posted on 10/14/2005 6:21:28 PM PDT by Mia T
ESTRICH IMPEACHED BY HER OWN WORDS,
The usual clinton rube arrogance rooted in stupidity.
The clintons figured that Estrich in their corner would make clinton serial rape and predation just disappear, not understanding that her presence would only intensify the scrutiny and that her 'expertise' and prior utterances would be used against them... and her.
Indeed, by twisting her own scholarship, Estrich indicts the clintons just as surely as the twisting double helix on that blue Gap dress.
Susan Estrich, The Case For Hillary Clinton
This Estrich eyewash exposes clinton's central strategem: tie the fate of all women to the fate of the clinton candidacy in a cynical attempt to get the women's vote, (recognizing that the women's vote is hardly a lock for hillary. A not insignificant number of leftist women can't stomach missus clinton and are actively working to short-circuit her candidacy.)
Estrich argues that missus clinton is qualified, that indeed missus clinton is the only woman who is qualified. If either claim were true, the clinton agitprop would have modeled the protagonist in ABC's latest clinton infomercial, "Commander-in-Chief," after missus clinton.
But it did not.
It modeled its "Commander-in-Chief" exemplar after missus clinton's infinitely more qualified potential opponent, Condi Rice.
This clinton-Estrich ploy to get the women's vote, and perhaps even more so, the ploy's utter lack of subtlety, are an insult to the intelligence of all women.
The clintons' fundamental error is always the same: They are too arrogant and dim-witted to understand that the demagogic process in this fiberoptic age isn't about counting spun heads; it's about not discounting circumambient brains.
Susan Estrich
While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. Analysts make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.
These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.
Defeating the enemy in the battlefield isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous, troglodyte mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary, forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."
It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."
ALSO SEE:
EXPOSES STOCK HILLARY PLOY: EXPLOIT WOMEN
my amazon.com review
(please FReep)
(For details, goto HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM)
Hannity and Colmes
The Broaddrick-Estrich-Cliff interview on the clintons' serial rape and predation
(excerpted from HEAR SUSAN ESTRICH: hillary plays 'the victim' for votes)
STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: ED KLEIN AND SUSAN ESTRICH AGREE ABOUT HILLARY
ESTRICH BOOK EXPOSES STOCK HILLARY PLOY: EXPLOIT WOMEN
OPEN LETTER TO SEAN HANNITY ON ESTRICH INTERVIEW, THE CLINTONS' RAPE OF BROADDRICK
(with additions, corrections, addendum)
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN
retrograde feminist fraud positions herself as victim (again) in order to win White House
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]
How did the flower children fall for the clintons, 2 such self-evident thugs and opportunists?
KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA, AND A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT IN BROADDRICK RAPE
NOTE THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN CLINTON REACTION TIME AND CONTENT TO THE TWO RAPE CHARGES
CATCHING THE CONSCIENCE OF THE KINGFISH
differential reaction to the two rape charges snares the clintons
hillary clinton is a "CONGENITAL LIAR"
("I am not a crook")
BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST
- JEANINE PIRRO: 30-year career fighting for the abused woman
- HILLARY CLINTON: 30-year career abusing women
ping
Liddy Dole is better qualified. She has actually run some things, successfully.
The question, which Greta on FoxNews just teased with -- is America ready for a woman President!!!
That is not the question - the question is -- do we have a woman qualified to be President of the United States of America. I have to ask - do we have a Margaret Thatcher or a Jeane Kirkpatrick amongst us?
It should never be asked - are we ready - it should be asked who qualifies.
Hillary Rodham Clinton does not. Susan Estrich, is just Susan Estrich who is another screeching lady saying nothing and will be one of many trying to make a leader out of a follower.
Watching Greta and Susan now talking about a woman president -- I used to get the two mixed up -- now I see why I got them mixed up. Two peas in a pod.
kindly FReep review BUMP (i.e., answer 'Was this review helpful to you?')
(my amazon.com nom de plume is 'concerned woman')
bump
bump
|
Any randomly selected FReeper female (or male, for that matter ;) ) is better qualified to be president than missus clinton. Missus clinton's automatic disqualifiers are many and span the gamut, from lack of experience to lack of character to lack of vision to lack of psychological stability to lack of leadership to lack of creative intelligence to lack of analytic intelligence to lack of emotional intelligence. We should have to go no farther, however, than her role in the rape of Juanita Broaddrick to view her potential candidacy as dead in the water. The Geffen-Ickes wing of the Democrat Party has it exactly right. "I'm one of the few in the semi-inner circle who [doesn't] think she can win" [the White House]. Harold Ickes Sen. Hillary Clinton should not count on help from Hollywood mogul David Geffen in her possible run for the White House. Geffen, who was a generous supporter and pal of Bill Clinton when he was president, trashed Hillary's prospects last night during a Q&A at the 92nd St. Y in New York City. "She can't win, and she's an incredibly polarizing figure," the billionaire Democrat told his audience. "And ambition is just not a good enough reason." Lloyd Grove reports in fresh editions of the NY DAILY NEWS the audience broke with "hearty applause" over Geffen's comments. Developing... GEFFEN UNLOADS ON HILLARY: 'SHE CAN'T WIN' |
|
"My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.... there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president"
|
HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue
Who in heaven's name is writing missus clinton's speeches?
A "handling the hillary dud factor" AFTERWORD
SCHEMA PINOCCHIO
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor
HILLARY IN AVIARY
Mindless rhinestone-studded-and-tented kleptocracy
the significance of missus clinton's gratuitous gerundial g-droppings
KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA, AND A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT IN BROADDRICK RAPE
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)
Why ABC's "Commander-in-Chief" is a Condi Rice clone
hillary's burqa
New York, New York -- if hillary can't make it there, she can't make it anywhere
thx
thx
What merits? (see post #11)
excellent. bump
If one compares Miers to St. Hillary as to qualifications, whom is the most qualified? Not on the coat tails of a man, but to stand alone on their merits.
Hillary (the smartest woman in the world S\) joined the Rose (shredder) law firm on the day Slick became AR AG, she became a partner of Rose on the day BJ was elected gov of AR, she became first lady on the day Bezzlebub became POTUS.
Miers on her own, joined, became a partner, then headed a truly huge law firm. On her own, she became first woman partner of, then went on to become first woman to head a law firm in TX. On her own she became the first woman to head the Dallas bar, then the first woman to head the TX bar.
If the dems and lib MSM rant that Hitlery on her merits is qualified to become POTUS? Then Miers on her merits is qualified to rule the world, or, at the very least, become a justice of the SCOTUS.
Zipper-hoisting aside, what has missus clinton accomplished in her lifetime? I see only destruction in her wake.
|
Getting off topic.
I rate the Hitlery at a minus ten on merits. It is what the dems, MSM and libs say her merits are? ie: They have selected her as the chosen one, that is all which matters for her to win the primaries.
bump
Estrich was on Michael Medved's show Friday and refused to directly answer Medved's direct questioning of her regarding whether or not she believed that krinton raped Jaunita Broaddrick. Not once, but at least twice. She actually slid by the question by claiming a lot of women from that era thought they were raped and insinuated that the word 'rape' has a fluid meaning. I'm sorry that she was raped, but she doesn't have a clue to what rape means by my lights. She might as well get down on her knees and ask for more. She's shown she's not a respectable legal mind...she's merely a wet wipe for the krintons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.