Replies

If one compares Miers to St. Hillary as to qualifications, whom is the most qualified? Not on the coat tails of a man, but to stand alone on their merits.

Hillary (the smartest woman in the world S\) joined the Rose (shredder) law firm on the day Slick became AR AG, she became a partner of Rose on the day BJ was elected gov of AR, she became first lady on the day Bezzlebub became POTUS.

Miers on her own, joined, became a partner, then headed a truly huge law firm. On her own, she became first woman partner of, then went on to become first woman to head a law firm in TX. On her own she became the first woman to head the Dallas bar, then the first woman to head the TX bar.

If the dems and lib MSM rant that Hitlery on her merits is qualified to become POTUS? Then Miers on her merits is qualified to rule the world, or, at the very least, become a justice of the SCOTUS.

My 'what merits?' refers to hillary, not Miers. (Miers is clearly a woman of accomplishment. (That is not to say she is qualified to be a justice, however.))

Zipper-hoisting aside, what has missus clinton accomplished in her lifetime? I see only destruction in her wake.

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

by Mia T, 3.7.04

"I'm one of the few in the semi-inner circle who [doesn't] think she can win" [the White House].
Harold Ickes
Time, January 2005

Sen. Hillary Clinton should not count on help from Hollywood mogul David Geffen in her possible run for the White House.
Geffen, who was a generous supporter and pal of Bill Clinton when he was president, trashed Hillary's prospects last night during a Q&A at the 92nd St. Y in New York City.
"She can't win, and she's an incredibly polarizing figure," the billionaire Democrat told his audience. "And ambition is just not a good enough reason."
Lloyd Grove reports in fresh editions of the NY DAILY NEWS the audience broke with "hearty applause" over Geffen's comments.

Developing...

GEFFEN UNLOADS ON HILLARY: 'SHE CAN'T WIN'
DRUDGE REPORT
Thu Feb 17 2005 23:13:00 ET

issus clinton says she doesn't think she will be asked to be John Kerry's running mate.... and doesn't think she would accept, in any case. "Think" seems to be the operative word.... (or is it "doesn't think?")
Susan Estrich had it exactly right when she said missus clinton is unelectable. If hillary clinton wants to occupy the Oval Office, she must perforce either marry the president (been there, done that) or ascend to the throne; that is to say, missus clinton must zipper-hoist.... (We will leave the means of ascension to your imagination and her devices. Suffice it to say, John Kerry would be wise to sharpen the ol' peripheral vision.)
For her entire adult (such as it is) life, zipper-hoisting has been missus clinton's principal means of upward mobility.

Zipper-hoisting has proved to be a sticky wicket for missus clinton, owing not to antithetical feminist ideology, as one would expect -- feminists willingly sacrificed feminism on the altar of clintonism -- but to zipper choice, her rather injudicious attachment early on to a certain zipper habitually on the downslide.
Look for missus clinton to switch zippers. And sooner rather than later. (Note: Kerry's zipper is the current default choice; missus clinton would have much preferred the General's.)
What zippers are to missus clinton, heiresses are to John Kerry. As comptroller of the Democrat coffers, missus clinton is the de facto Democrat "heiress," (Teresa Heinz without the ketchup, if you will).
Thus, what we have here is the perfect symbiosis, the perfect playing into proclivities, the lowest common denominator, the perfect pair....