BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST (Jeanine Pirro-hillary clinton matchup)

Pirro Blasts Clinton Viagra Giveaway

Carl Limbacher
May 29, 2005
NewsMax.com

The New York prosecutor who said this week that she may challenge Hillary Clinton for her Senate seat next year is blasting a Clinton administration program that gave free Viagra to sex offenders, saying it was tantamount to "state-assisted sexual assault."

"I am outraged," Westchester County District Attorney Jeanine Pirro told Fox News. "Because we all know that level three sex offenders - and my office prosecutes them all the time - are repeat offenders."

Without mentioning Mrs. Clinton or her husband by name, Pirro railed against the government boondoggle, saying, "By paying for their Viagra, it amounts to state-assisted sexual assault."

In May 1998 - during the height of the Monica Lewinsky scandal - the Clinton Administration told state officials that it "intended to require their Medicaid programs to pay for medically approved uses of the impotence drug Viagra," according to the New York Times.

The Clinton Viagra giveaway continued unfettered until this week, when New York State officials discovered that nearly 200 convicted sex offenders were using the program to obtain the impotence drug.

Mrs. Clinton's potential challenger said the Viagra program has likely led to further sexual attacks.

"My office has prosecuted cases where pedophiles have used Viagra on children, where 86-year-old pedophiles are using Viagra, so they can continue to molest our children," Pirro told Fox.

"Shame on us for allowing this to happen," she added. "As long as you have been convicted and are now registered as a sexual deviant, you should not be getting this, because it amounts to the government helping you to assault other victims."

In a statement issued earlier this week, Sen. Clinton said she was concerned that the Viagra giveaway "poses safety concerns for the public."

But she declined to acknowledge any responsibility for the blunder, insisting instead that the program had been misused.

"There is no doubt that the news of sexual offenders receiving Viagra under the Medicaid program is deeply disturbing and runs contrary to the purpose of Medicaid which is to provide health care coverage for uninsured, low-income individuals."

Sen. Clinton said she will "explore legislative options to address this issue."

On Monday, Mrs. Pirro announced she was considering a run for statewide office, including a possible challenge to the top Democrat.

Why are you promoting liberal Jeannie Pirro in the PRIMARY?

The best candidate I can see at this point is John Spencer, he was basically the "Rudy Giulani" of the New York suburbs and was an extremely successful and popular Mayor of Yonkers as well as a prosperous banker and decorated Vietnam War Veteran.

Cox would be my second choice but his biggest positive: instance name recongition from being son-in-law of a U.S. President, is also his biggest drawback (Nixon?!)

Pirro should run for A.G. of NY instead of U.S. Senate. The NY Republican Party really NEEDS a credible candidate to take the open seat with Spitzer out of the way, and c'mon, the "Westchester County District Attorney" is much more credible as a candidate for A.G. than a candidate for the U.S. Senate. The idea that she's the "only" candidate who can beat Hillary is silly. First off, ANYONE aside from Rudy is going have a big uphill struggle. Second, she's a little known RINO with a tainted husband. Cox and Spencer are just as credible.

Pirro for A.G. and Spencer for U.S. Senate.

Note the corrections/additions to points 2 and 5--

WHY JEANINE:

1- The goal here is to preemptively short-circuit the clintons' 2nd assault on this country.
2- RINO is a plus in NY
3- An alleged mob lawyer husband is a step up from a documented rapist husband (and wife) (this, not even beginning to factor in all of his--their--other crimes, betrayals, dysfunctions, dangers and utter failures)
4- Pirro, having fought for the abused woman for her 30-year career, is the corapist clinton's worst nightmare.
5- Unlike hillary clinton, Jeanine Pirro has star power in her own right, has beauty, eloquence, intelligence, independent achievements, etc., all of which serve only to underscore what an ugly, unqualified, zipper-hoisted fishwife clinton is.

1- If the goal is "stop Hillary" before she gets her claws on the oval office, then the only solution is "draft Rudy". He’s the ONLY candidate who would be LIKELY to “beat Hillary”. ANYONE else, whether they are Ed Cox, Jeannie Pirro, or John Spencer, will face an UPHILL battle. Therefore if we have a second tier candidate we might as well have one who stands up for GOP values and has some political track record. If you can find ANY poll showing Pirro polling even with the Hilderbeast and can therefore “beat Hillary” (while Cox and Spencer lose in a landslide), feel free to let me know and I’ll switch my alligance to Pirro. Otherwise I repeat my assessement that ANY Republican other than Rudy faces an uphill battle.

2- Please explain to former U.S. Senator Al D’Amato (R-NY) that he was unelectable and should have “stepped aside” for “electable” RINO Jacob Javits. You also might want to explain this concept to former U.S. Senator James Buckley (R-NY)

3- “An alleged mob lawyer husband” is the EXACT reason why Pirro ‘s attempts to go after the criminal Clinton corruption will backfire as the media skews her own family’ scandals. Cox and Spencer look like saints in comparison.

4- Pirro, as “Westchester County District Attorney” who has NEVER been involved in campaigns before, is MUCH better suited to run for the OPEN seat of Attorney General of New York (where the NY GOP desperately NEEDS a credible candidate), than try to seek the U.S. Senate as an entry level position. Cox and Spencer are far more familiar with politics being a bloodsport.

5- The idea that “Jeanine Pirro” is a household name in NY with “star power” is pretty silly. Far more people have heard of Richard Nixon’s son in law than a district attorney from Westchester. And the fact that Mayor John Spencer, a conservative Republican, is venerated in the largely Democrat suburban area of Yonkers, gives him far more “star power” than Hillary. As a beloved Mayor and decorated Vietnam War vet, he is the very much the suburban version of the Rudy and the kind of saavy pit bull who can put the Clintons in their place on the campaign trail.

SPENCER: A 30-YEAR CAREER ATTACKING AMERICA’S ENEMIES
At the height of the Vietnam War, when others were avoiding the draft, John Spencer chose to enlist in the United States Army to serve his country. It was as a young Infantry re and the importance getting beside you. Spencer was awarded the Bronze Star and Combat Infantryman ’s This awesome responsibility of leading men whose very survival depended on him, and molded him into the leader he is today, a breath of fresh air to New York politics. In 1996,Spencer was honored when the heavily Democratic voters of Yonkers, New York ’s fourth largest city, elected him for Mayor, not once, but twice. In his second term, he won with well over 60%of the vote. John Spencer was proud to serve as Mayor of this demographically diverse city for eight years, which saw an unprecedented rebirth in the quality of life during his tenure. As mayor, he stood up for what was right for the people he represented. What others thought of as impossible, he saw as challenges to overcome. He took a stagnant city that was in decline and changed its image to a city of progress. He revitalized the waterfront, cut taxes that others said couldn’t ’t be cut and improved services. . Spencer favors real education reform, saving Social Security and saving Social Security and saving Social Security Medicare, I improving health care, better homeland security, winning the war on terror, providing a stable and self-defensible Iraq, ending illegal immigration, greater efforts to reduce abortion and making sure every child is wanted and raised by a loving family. New Yorkers deserve a U.S. Senator who will work night and day on these issues for them. While Hillary uses her Senate seat as a bus stop on the way to the White House, to John Spencer the Senate would be the opportunity of a lifetime to serve the people of the State and the Nation. He’ll be a compassionate and caring public servant who will work tirelessly for seniors, families and the hard-working people of New York to improve their quality of life. His only aspiration is to be the best senator New York State has ever had and he ’ll put the needs of the people FIRST.

HILLARY: A 30-YEAR CAREER ATTACKING AMERICAN TROOPS
Hillary dishonors our troops and Voted YES on granting normal trade relations status to Vietnam. In Washington to begin forming a campaign team, John Spencer said Clinton's questioning of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld at a Senate Armed Services hearing Thursday constituted a "thinly veiled attack" on President Bush and was another example of how Democratic rhetoric on the war is dividing the country. Clinton, a Democrat, asked Rumsfeld to repudiate White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove's remarks this week that liberals are not tough enough on America's enemies. She said the remarks, made at a Conservative Party dinner in New York City, were "insulting" and "disturbing" to people like herself who had "legitimate questions" about the administration's conduct of the war while supporting it.” She says we all love our troops. But then to be silent when politicians like (Sen.) Dick Durbin, Howard Dean and Ted Kennedy and John Kerry attack the president, that's really aiding and comforting the enemy," Spencer said. Spencer said he was particularly incensed that Clinton brought up the Vietnam War and its divisiveness while questioning Rumsfeld. Clinton said that she was old enough to remember how deeply divided the country was "and never want to see that again." But Spencer took issue, saying that as a Vietnam veteran he was "appalled that she would raise the fact that our nation was divided during Vietnam, and then proceed to divide us further today." This is just another example of Senator Clinton's attempts to have it both ways; She voted for the war in Iraq, and then bashes President Bush about the war every opportunity she gets. It should have occurred to Hillary that her remarks demoralize the troops, since the vast majority believe in the Iraq cause.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.