Posted on 05/13/2005 7:36:25 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
I've often thought that since DU is headquartered in Wash DC, maybe it's a server in the Media Division of the DNC Headquarters. That's probably where all the C-SPAN callers are also located.
Hey FRiend, old buddy, old pal, LOL - please give me a short synopsis once in awhile, by FReepmail oK?
Thanks!
(I'm a bit busy at work these days.)
1. Has Undie been verifiably diagnosed with pancreatic cancer?
2. Is Undie scheduled for surgery at Johns Hopkins?
Undie could easily clear up these two issues, if he so desired. So could Johns Hopkins. If both are affirmed, I would ask no further question.
Then again, no one ever accused any DU mod of being the sharpest knife...
You guys rock! I don't want Andy or anyone to have cancer, and even if they are the dumbest of DUmmies no one deserves to be scammed.
Man I go to sleep and I miss important stuff. Anyone got a brief synopsis of what I've missed? I left off when the posts were in the 500's...
check out post #837. New timeline info.
Well, tx--you were right there! Have you found #760? That is a really good one! You just can't go to sleep around here! I liked the line you were taking earlier today on those cashier's checks. I had to go eat dinner, so has any more progress been made? See ya there....or elsewhere!;o)
Mee, too.
"BTW... members here have the images saved. Nice try!"
I was looking on the other thread HERE and I get the blue box with the X. Perhaps it is just my computer, I don't know. Do they show up for you?
Okay, I'm headed off to work, to get all the books done by tomorrow morning, so I can watch the felonious Andy 24/7/365 beginning sometime tomorrow (after dinner, after church, after getting cigarettes, whatnot).
DUmmieland has been pretty quiet most of the day; but appearances of course can be deceiving. And based upon historical observation of DUmmieland, "quiet" is usually suddenly erupted.
I just sent the latest on the felonious Andy to Bev Harris.....again. I am sure she reads it, but I doubt if she will "comment," least of all not in here.
Also, the two pages purportedly from Drs. Hartman and Pannu that Undie posted the other day, and which I reposted on the MOADUFU (Mother Of All DUFUs)--those two pages have since disappeared. Undie must have made them inaccessible from his Photobucket. KJ, Speed, Frank, anybody: Do you have a screen capture of those two pages that you could post on this thread?
**********************************************************************
That is not true. I've been on the phone with Johns Hopkins since May 2nd proving this is all a hoax. This was going to come out. Andy is just stalling until all the paypal money is released. Principles refusal to admit any lies were employed to raise the money. This is all the proof anyone needs that these scammers are relying on the fact that Andy is the only one that is going to be investigated. They also believe that Andy hasn't said anything actionable. What they don't know is that everyone from Skinner down to Grandma of triplets is being investigated as we argue. Principles response no doubt will be similar to sfexpat's when she said she'd love to speak to the FBI. I hope they also won't mind speaking to Hopkins Lawyers who are less than pleased with the methods used to collect the money. Hey there's something not covered by hippa laws. Yes a Johns Hopkins lawyer can be grateful for information and forthcoming with his opinions about how Hopkins name is being abused for fundraising efforts by a patient or non patient. He can also tell you how many people have been inquiring about the scam So principle back to you for a second. Again let me ask how the running totals were calculated. Why if sfexpat had access to Andys pay pal information to check donations did she need everyone to email her the amount they donated? If she didn't have that access why did she ask anyone to email her? Did she not trust the numbers Andy was/would provide? Today, 03:59 PM
#1148
*********************************************************************
lol You think she is going to answer? I'm not interested in having a liar give me her spin. How about you just post her answer if she has given you permission to post her email address. Will you say that those questions are pretty important? Moving on (or back), you previously stated that the scam preformed on May 5 was detailed in the documents Andy posted as proof. Are you sure about that or would you like a chance to correct yourself?
Today, 04:27 PM #1152
AndyScam
Newbie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 45
********************************************************************
This was posted on Kos I think before Armando deleted the fundraising thread last week. (sorry no live link) Ive also copied other emails AnonymousArmy posted that he said he received from Beth when he was directed by a collector to contact her directly. This is why I ask if there are prerequisites. Several people have tried to contact her before.
******************************************************************
I know Andy didn't have surgery scheduled on Tuesday. What I'm doing here is posting questions knowing that one brave DU'r (like SomthingsGottaGive was) will break the wall of silence over there and start asking the questions they read here that you can't answer or won't. So in that vain. Is it important for Andy to account for all the money he received during this fundraiser? Should he have to explain any of the inconsistencies used by his supporters to collect the money? I'm asking for you to check you own replies. You said there was proof posted of the may 5 scan. All I'm giving you is a chance to correct yourself.
******************************************************************
Totally irrelevant who I am. I've seen Beth claim anonymousarmy was harassing her. I have a threatening reply posted by AA but haven't seen the stalking emails that produced it. Could you ask sfexpat for permission to post the offending emails that she claims warranted a complaint to AA's isp as claimed in a DU thread. (And the threatening email I copied) Also ask her why Kos hasnt stripped him of his posting privileges after his trolling efforts there and on DU? She claims on a DU thread kos will ban him Also ask her why she insists AA is a Bevbot when she knows otherwise. Is that not another lie?
******************************************************************
You are a riot principle. Now his name is "Steve" wow you guys are top investigators. Did you get that from his letter to the Hopkins lawyer named "Dan"? Please show me where "Steve" said he filed a report with the FBI. The only thing I see is him saying "The FBI has been contacted". Also if you did some research, like I have, you'd see that "Steve" aka anonymousarmy, somthingsgotagive, MrNiceGuyDied, makes no bones about living in Toronto, Canada. Is he supposed to worry about the FBI, or CSIS. So now we are actually getting somewhere you seem quite rattled in that post to me. How come? Did Beth give you permission to post "Steve's" harassing emails or are you just trying to threaten me hoping I won't continue posting the evidence. CU has done nothing to violate any laws. I havent broken any laws posting what I have. Since Andy hasn't shown he has cancer then even if it was against some law to accuse a cancer patient of committing fraud nobody here has anything to worry about. LOL So are you finished answering my questions or will you hang around hoping I break more imaginary laws? What makes you think "Steve" was making up the part about talking to or corresponding with a Hopkins lawyer? What makes you think I haven't talked to the same lawyer? LOL
*****************************************************************
If I am "Steve" then sfexapt's threat to have his isp yank his service didn't amount to much. But hey I never claimed to be Steve. If everyone behind the scenes is talking about who he is and how they can stop him, why do they insist he is Bev and why do they refuse to disclose his online aliases? You said he interfered with PayPal... How exactly did he do that. Is it illegal to call paypal and ask them to look into the legitimacy of a donation drive? Is it illegal to challenge a payment once suspicions are raised and not debunked? Do you even know if "Steve" donated? From what I've read that seems highly unlikely. Even though many DUmmies have speculated he donated as part of the dastardly plan to kill Andy. But, from what you say he wouldn't have needed to donate. Just calling and asking a question is enough to lock the funds and threaten his survival. It's really quite telling that it is me you threaten here on this site. Why me? why not all the others that have cast aspersions on Andy's credibility and likelihood of actually having cancer. Can you point to where Andy actually says he has cancer and not just "consistent with cancer"? (oops bev slip) As you can see I'm just waiting for the "Andy never said he had cancer" bullshit but I'd love it if you could prove me wrong by pointing to him posting he definitively has cancer. LOL
********************************************************************
I havent seen "Steve" ( I'm so glad you've figured that out typing all his screen names is a pain) post anything anywhere froma lawyer at Johns Hopkins. Only his letter toa lawyer there. However, I have an email, personal addressed by a Hopkins lawyer if you'd like me to post it. Its contents will be rather disappointing however it will prove I too have been "contacted" by a hopkins lawyer named....wait for it...."Dan" I also know his last name but lalarawraw is a top investigator I'm sure she'll get to the bottom of it as quickly as she nailed "Steves" first name. Do you want to provide one of those links you are famous for requiring?
**************************************************************
Quote: 157. you guys are like Bush supporter when questioned about WMD. I'm not some nobody. And i already said 18 of the 20 calls to jh did get the hippa reaction. So I started calling pretending to be the friend of an uninsured, out of state patient looking for all the options for my dying friend. I'll diary about that later. For now Ill post a letter I sent to a Lawyer at JH. .... Hi Dan, Thanks for replying. Briefly I'd like to explain why I called in the first place. Over the past couple of years Andy Stephenson has been involved in a few questionable donation drives that ended rather badly. In the past six months I've received no less than 40 emails from Andy, or one of his agents, soliciting donations for everything from lawyer fees, unemployment relief, to medical tests. This week the request took a rather shocking turn when the pleas for money stated the were to receive cancer treatment. Now if Andy in fact does require this treatment I'm not the type of person that would try and hamper those efforts. However, there have been several claims made that just don't quite add up. As you will see in the links provided it has been made clear that Johns Hopkins is the only hospital that can do the procedure and due to his financial situation he must pay the hospital 25 thousand dollars up front to schedule the surgery. The remaining 25 thousand is apparently due before the surgery or shortly there after. This part is not clear. What I find disturbing is how the five main people collecting the money will drag the good name of Johns Hopkins through the mud in order to get people to feel sorry for Andy and fork over their hard earned money fighting the soulless hospital administration. Several people in the DailyKos links I have provided describe a much different hospital system than the stereotypical impression, one often promoted in the media, that Andy's donation crew repeat in every plea they send out. If Andy can get adequate treatment in his home state of Washington then I think the methods being used to collect the money verge on fraud. But I'm not a lawyer or law enforcement member. To make a short story long. Had Andy said
"I'm very sick, the local cancer hospital says my chances of survival are 50-50 but Johns Hopkins has a treatment that will cost 20 thousand dollars more but increase my odds to 70-30" I think his friends and supporters would still have come up with the money. Instead he has allowed Johns Hopkins to look like a greedy heartless corporation without ever disclosing any alternative options. I'm sure Johns Hopkins fundraises from the progressive community from time to time and I think this kind of behavior hurts the reputation of your institution and may hamper future fundraising efforts. So, that's the reason for my concern. Please see below the links to just some of the sites asking for donations. The DailyKos for example has US senators posting on it and receives half a million hits a day. If I thought these pleas for money were limited to fringe site with not much traffic I might not care. But considering the reach of these sites I had to get in touch. Thank you for your time. Steve Here is a typical comment from the threads..... "I just sent some money. Not much, but I'm amazed that John Hopkins has gotten to the point where they are asking for upfront money on a $50,000 life saving surgery.Goddamn, I'm angry. The notion that John Hopkins is demanding 50% down for life saving surgery makes my fucking blood boil. I wonder how much they charge for the same surgery to a Health Insurance company? Usually hospitals charge the uninsured 2-3x the rate charged insurance companies." http://www.democraticunderground.co...mesg_id=3561640 http://www.democraticunderground.co...ess=104x3588998 http://www.democraticunderground.co...mesg_id=3586155 http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/5/2/142624/0814 http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/5/1/125012/8506 http://www.democracyforwashington.com/ http://www.seattlefordean.com/ http://shireen.forclark.com/story/2005/4/30/231124/276 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MoveOnPgh/message/1649 http://blog.pdamerica.org/?p=22 http://www.votepa.us/ http://www.seo-blog.org/5755_omfg_r...tthegop_machine
Principle please review the letter and tell me which parts look like lies, distortions, unreasonable, nasty, or anywhere near as nefarious as your crew will protest. Here is what I've seen "Steve" post on the subject of Hopkins Lawyer's.
MrNiceGuyDied (72 posts)
Tue May-10-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #112
***************************************************************
Sorry about the horrid formatting, but more is being released over at CU now, this is it, it's over guys!
Just when you thought things couldn't smell any more rotten...check out this post at the DUmp.
______________________________________________________________
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Fri May-13-05 01:09 PM
Original messageThe REAL Andy Stephenson scandal
Obviously the idea that Andy's illness was a scandalous hoax is false. But in all the urgency to raise money for the surgery and then in the uproar over the allegations, we have forgotten the real scandal:
That Johns Hopkins would not perform life saving surgery without a cash deposit.
___________________________________________________________
Call me crazy...but could this whole entire "Andy Has Cancer" thing been some kind of stunt to try and bring attention to the DUmps favorite entitlement..."free healthcare for everyone"...and they picked JH as an easy target becasue they are one of the leading hospitals in the nation?
I can see it now...."yeah Andy scammed people out of money...yeah it was a LOT of money...but he did it because he feels so strongly about the sorry state of healthcare in this country he felt it was the ONLY way he could draw attention to the issue."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.