Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberty is Communicable
JEFFHEAD.COM - Give me Liberty or Give me Death ^ | April 22, 2005 | Jeff Head

Posted on 04/22/2005 6:42:19 AM PDT by Jeff Head

What is Liberty?

Well, IMHO, in the context of American liberty, ere's an answer....

Liberty is freedom from encumberance in an environment where the unalienable rights of mankind are both recognized and respected and where individual "Free Will" bounded by fundamental moral principle is the avenue for interaction in society .

That's a lot of pretty words that basically say that if a people are to be free, they and their government have to recognize and respect the God-given rights of others and be moral. In fact, liberty can not coexist with widespread individual, or institutional immorality. Immorality places an individual's, or a group's, wishes, lusts, cravings, passions or beliefs above the unalienable rights of others. When this occurs, unalienable rights are infringed and liberty is lost.

Liberty can also not exist where moral choice is compelled and individual Free Will is destroyed. Again, the result is that unalienable rights are infringed and liberty is lost

Either of these negative conditions, rampant immorality or rampant compulsion of moral choice, lead directly to tyranny. On one hand as society breaks down and individuals infringe on one another's rights tyranny rushes in to "restore order". On the other hand, or as a result of the first, the infringement is institutionalized as the "government" compels people in their individual choices. You decide how close we are to one or the other today.

The American path to stable, lasting liberty, which has maintained for well over two hundred years and been the beacon of liberty for the entire world, correctly enumerates all of the following unallienable rights :

- Life
- Liberty (meaning free will)
- The pursuit of happiness (meaning a livelihood and personal property deriving therefrom)
- Free speech
- Freedom of religion
- Freedom of association
- Freedom of Assembly
- Petition and Redress of Elected or Appointed Officials
- Self defense (firearms ownership)
- Secure in person and belongings
- Justice (meaning probable cause, trial by jury or peers, facing accusers, etc.)
There are others that are left to the individual states and the people. All of them derive from the Creator and are our natural rights as soveriegn individuals and are only enumerated in our Declaration of Independence and our Bill of Rights in the US Constitution.

That our unalienable rights are enumerated by the Constitution and not bequeathed is a critical point in this understanding, as is the fact that morality and individual Free Will are inexorably tied to the exercise of those unalienable rights. These are facts that MUST be taught to all Americans, from the youngest years on, if there is any hope for society to understand and equitably exercise their unalienable rights and their liberty.

This education then, must be the object of our most strenuous efforts. Without this knowledge, we as a people will drift far afield from true liberty, and will ultimately fall victim to demigogs, tyrants, populists and our own material cravings and other passions. Therefore, that we should waiste and wear out ourselves in such a worthy effort in bringing to light this knowledge that our enemies continue to go to any length to hide and prevent.

When individuals understand that they were meant to be free to act in accordance with their own consciense and only within the confines of another's rights, the feeling is at once exciting and contagious. It opens a vista to a world of opportunity and to the accompanying accountablility for their own actions. This accountability becomes the great governor in a society where individuals prefer to therby govern themselves as opposed to being governd by an all inclusive, overburdensome government. Such a society, where these truths of liberty are understood, develops and maintains a government whose primary purpose is to :
1) Protect the borders from outside invaders who would rob the people of their liberty and all the fruits of their labors.
2) To insure that any infringement on the unalienable rights of others is brought to justice, as provided for in the enumeration of those rights.
3) To provide for equitable commerce between the states.
Folks, this is Liberty ... this is what our founders envisioned and what our nation has lived out for most of its history. This knowledge is communicable and is the great antidote to our modern ills ... from cries for gun control, to social welfare systems, to intrusive taxes to rampant immorality. Some of the greatest comments on these topics were provided by our founders ... our initial great communicators. Let's punctuate this article with their words and communications on the topic, and let's catch that "communcable" spirit that they felt :
Quotes from the Founders of this Republic on Liberty

"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other."- John Adams, Oct. 11, 1798 Address to the military
"Public virtue cannot exist in a nation without private virtue, and public virtue is the only foundation of republics." John Adams
"God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure if we have removed their only firm basis: a conviction in the minds of men that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever."- Thomas Jefferson
"And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms ... The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants," Thomas Jefferson.
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations."- James Madison
"We have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God."- James Madison
"A general dissolution of the principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy.... While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but once they lose their virtue, they will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader.... If virtue and knowledge are diffused among the people, they will never be enslaved. This will be their great security." - Samuel Adams
"[N]either the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend of the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue, and who, so far as his power and influence extend, will not suffer a man to be chosen onto any office of power and trust who is not a wise and virtuous man." Samuel Adams
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom...go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels nor arms. May your chains set lightly upon you and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."- Samuel Adams
"Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants."- William Penn
"Bad men cannot make good citizens. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom. No free government, or the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue; and by a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles." Patrick Henry
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined," Patrick Henry.
"Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed, if so celestial an article as Freedom should not be highly rated."- Thomas Paine; 1776
"[I]f we and our posterity reject religious instruction and authority, violate the rules of eternal justice, trifle with the injunctions of morality, and recklessly destroy the political constitution which holds us together, no man can tell how sudden a catastrophe may overwhelm us, that shall bury all our glory in profound obscurity." Daniel Webster
"They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety," Benjamin Franklin.
"No country upon earth ever had it more in its power to attain blessings. Much to be regretted indeed would it be, were we to depart from the road which Providence has pointed us to, so plainly; I cannot believe it will ever come to pass. The Great Governor of the Universe has led us too long and too far to forsake us in the midst of it. We may, now and then, get bewildered; but I hope and trust that there is good sense and virtue enough left to recover the right path. " - George Washington

These men knew human nature, the human heart and the intricacies of individual and group dynamics. With all else that has changed in the intervening years, these principles and truths have not changed, and neither have the applicability of their words and teachings.

Let us therefore go forth and spread these truths and these principles abroad in our land. Such principle are forgotten, discarded and walked on at the peril of us all. Let us educate those around us as to the true underpinnings of our liberties, and let us be prepared to face direct and head-on with these truths, those individuals and institutions who would subvert and destroy our liberties and way of life.

If we do not unflinchingly face them with truth and principle now, and if we do not endeavor to pass these truths on to those around us ... the time will come, as surely as night follows day, and as surely as our founders faced the same, when our liberty faces so grave a threat that we will be compelled to defeat the resulting tyranny (either internal or exterenal) by nothing short of force of arms.

SUBNOTE :
Here's a GREAT few thoughts on our laws and how they should be fashioned from Frederick Bastiat (1850) in his famous pamphlet :
The existence of persons and property preceded the existence of the legislator, and his function is only to guarantee their safety.

It is not true that the function of law is to regulate our consciences, our ideas, our wills, our education, our opinions, our work, our trade, our talents, or our pleasures. The function of law is to protect the free excercise of these rights, and to prevent any person from interfering with the free exercise of these rights by any other person.

Since law necessarily requires the support of force, its lawful domain is only in the areas where the use of force is necessary. This is justice.

Every individual has the right to use force for lawful self-defense. It is for this reason that the collective force - which is only the organized combination of the individual forces - may lawfully be used for the same purpose; and it cannot be used legitimately for any other purpose.

Law is soley the organization of the individual right of self-defense which existed before law was formalized. Law is justice.
If today, our lawmakers were interested in restoring this nation to its greatness, they would catch the vision that this land was established for soveriegn individuals, operating within the environment addressed by this essay, to govern themselves, not be governed by thousands of laws, regulations and agencies sent forth to harass the citizens and increase the power and prestige of lawmakers who ought rather to be the servants of the citizens.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: america; freedom; freeperjeffhead; jeffhead; liberty; morality; rights; unalienablerights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Thought I would re-publish this article on FR for comment and discussion that I initially wrote in 1999.
1 posted on 04/22/2005 6:42:28 AM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joanie-f; Dukie; Squantos; JohnHuang2; k.trujillo; Travis McGee; jim macomber; Critter; Lurker; ...

Some food for thought and discussion.


2 posted on 04/22/2005 6:43:28 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

His name is Phil and he hails from somewhere in Pennsylvania.

You will find him every Wednesday morning standing in front of the White House after traveling two hours from his home. He comes to Washington to make a statement that sends a strong message of support to the 9,000 beleaguered, soon to be homeless, resi dents of Gaza, Israel. By his very presence, he transcends many barriers and delivers a firm rebuke to our president.

I first met Phil on April 11 in Crawford, Texas when he approached me after I had delivered a speech to the throng of more than 3,000 people who had gathered from all over the U.S. While President Bush and PM Sharon met at the ranch, Phil was among thos e who had come from great distances to protest the expulsion of more than 9,000 people threatened with dispossession of their homes, businesses, places of worship, schools, and even cemeteries. Some of these families have lived in Gush Katif, the Jewish section of Gaza, for several generations, in a beautiful community overlooking the Mediterranean Sea.

In July, their homes are to be turned over to the same Palestinian terrorists who have repeatedly attacked their community with the purpose of driving them out. And now, after they have stood strong against the terrorists, they are being forced to leave , not by their attackers, but by their own government in collusion with the President of the U.S.

By some illogical thought process, George W. Bush has concluded that the victims of Palestinian jihad, whose families have been killed and maimed by vicious murderers wanting to steal their land, must be forced out of their homes. Their houses will then be turned over to the terrorists. He intends to finish their criminal work. This places the U.S. squarely on the side of the terrorists. It makes the U.S. complicit in dividing up the spoils of the war of terror instigated by the Palestinians and spons ored by radical Islamists.

To make matters worse, President Bush wants to sweeten the pot by giving them two million additional U.S. taxpayer dollars, on top of the billions already handed the Palestinians. A fortune in previous aid has not been accounted for. We do know that man y millions of dollars have been wasted on rockets, weapons and palaces for cronies of Arafat and the Palestinian Authority.

And what do the Israelis get in return for appeasing the terrorists and agreeing to sacrifice the residences and wellbeing of 9,000 residents of Gush Katif? You guessed it. Absolutely nothing.

At this point in time, the people who are being tossed out of their homes have no place to go. The Israeli government has not even made plans for them. All IDF reports predict an escalation of violence. The new Palestinian leader, Abu Abbas, has public ly said he will invite the terrorist leaders leaving Lebanon to move into Gaza once the Jews are removed. He has even officially taken Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorist organizations (on the State Dept. terrorist list) into his new government, and they are stockpiling weapons to renew their jihad war as soon as the Israelis are out of Gaza. Such a deal!

Meanwhile, back at the White House, our friend Phil is staging a one-man protest against this outrage. Phil is well aware of the injustice taking place in Israel and wants President Bush to know that Americans do not want to be part of it. Whether inte ntional or not - we are becoming allies with the very terrorists we have been fighting since 9-11 when we give them land and financial assistance.

Phil believes that terrorism should not win, and that it is obscene for American taxpayers to foot the bill to pay off the Middle East neighborhood bullies. He understands that the Arab world, with 23 countries, does not need one more country to foster international terrorism.

If you want to meet a true American who is willing to stand up for his convictions, honk your horn and tip your hat to Phil, as you drive by the White House any Wednesday morning. Let him know that you support him and if you would like – join him in his vigil. He is the Christian who is willing to not only complain about injustice but is willing to do something about it. He is the person wearing the orange t-shirt, the orange cap and carrying the orange sign - the color that signifies solidarity with the residents of Gush Katif. It is the color they are identified with.

And Phil is the man who speaks volumes for hundreds of thousands of Americans who don’t want the courageous pioneers of Gush Katif to be betrayed by our government. And he represents these same Americans who are particularly opposed to wasting hard earn ed tax dollars to pay for this betrayal.
___________

Esther Levens is CEO and Founder of the Unity Coalition for Israel (UCI), an alliance of more than 200 Jewish and Christian organizations representing millions of Americans. The groups support the safety and security of Israel.


3 posted on 04/22/2005 6:51:11 AM PDT by joesnuffy (The generation that survived the depression and won WW2 proved poverty does not cause crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
This accountability becomes the great governor in a society where individuals prefer to therby govern themselves as opposed to being governd by an all inclusive, overburdensome government.

And there is the rub. The 'Rats are the party of immorality and unaccountability which, as you have so clearly and eloquenty stated, are the mortal enemies of liberty.

4 posted on 04/22/2005 6:56:47 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
You cannot appease terrorists...ever.

HERE - The Golan Solution, is my plan for dealing with the terror in Israel.

5 posted on 04/22/2005 6:58:09 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Unfortunatley, that immorality and unaccountability is bleeding over into more and mopre RINOs.

Wherever it exists, it is the mortal enemy to liberty.

6 posted on 04/22/2005 7:00:43 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Let us educate those around us as to the true underpinnings of our liberties, and let us be prepared to face direct and head-on with these truths, those individuals and institutions who would subvert and destroy our liberties and way of life.

Bravo, Jeff!

( and I won't even get persnickety about positive rights being confused with inalienable rights...LOL!)

The Founders were brilliant men, and the more I learn, the more I am in awe of their vision!

Thomas Jefferson, Opinion on National Bank, 1791:
They are not to do anything they please to provide for the general welfare, but only to lay taxes for that purpose. To consider the latter phrase not as describing the purpose of the first, but as giving a distinct and independent power to do any act they please which may be good for the Union, would render all the preceding and subsequent enumerations of power completely useless. It would reduce the whole instrument to a single phrase, that of instituting a Congress with power to do whatever would be for the good of the United States; and as they sole judges of the good or evil, it would be also a power to do whatever evil they please ... Certainly no such universal power was meant to be given them. It was intended to lace them up straightly within the enumerated powers and those without which, as means, these powers could not be carried into effect.

Federalist No. 62, 1788:
It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man who knows what the law is today can guess what it will be to-morrow.

John Adams, Rights of the Colonists, 1772:
If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave.

7 posted on 04/22/2005 7:12:09 AM PDT by MamaTexan (*~ I'd rather stand with the few who are right than the many who are wrong ~*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; joanie-f; Alamo-Girl; marron
If today, our lawmakers were interested in restoring this nation to its greatness, they would catch the vision that this land was established for soveriegn individuals, operating within the environment addressed by this essay, to govern themselves, not be governed by thousands of laws, regulations and agencies sent forth to harass the citizens and increase the power and prestige of lawmakers who ought rather to be the servants of the citizens.

Certainly Jeff, this is not the opinion of the likes of Chuckie Schumer, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Boxer, Harry Reid, Teddy Kennedy, John Kerry, John McCain, Arlen Spector, Robert Byrd, and many other notables in the elected and judicial branches, who perceive their role as "wise governors" of all the rest of us -- who in their view are hopelessly incompetent such that we do not even understand what's good for us. Theirs is a model of rulership, not the model of agency or service on behalf of a sovereign people.

We cannot expect better from our public servants, it seems to me, for the simple reason that the people themselves are increasingly corrupt.

Ever since Plato and Solon, the clear message has been that no society can ever be better than the type of human being that mainly constitutes it. A good government of a corrupt people is a complete impossibility. And so is a bad government of a good people -- people of good will.

Notice that our elites work feverishly to destroy all awareness of the very foundation of our God-given liberties in the public square, with their programmatic intolerance and hostility towards religion.

Just listen to what this pack of jackels is already saying about Pope Benedict XVI. It is positively depressing to me.

8 posted on 04/22/2005 7:25:22 AM PDT by betty boop (If everyone is thinking alike, then no one is thinking. -- Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
>Notice that our elites work feverishly to destroy all awareness of the very foundation of our God-given liberties ...


Our "elites" waste time
lots of strange ways. Don't let glare
from tin foil blind you!

9 posted on 04/22/2005 7:34:19 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy

"By some illogical thought process, George W. Bush has concluded that the victims of Palestinian jihad, whose families have been killed and maimed by vicious murderers wanting to steal their land, must be forced out of their homes. Their houses will then be turned over to the terrorists. He intends to finish their criminal work. This places the U.S. squarely on the side of the terrorists. It makes the U.S. complicit in dividing up the spoils of the war of terror instigated by the Palestinians and spons ored by radical Islamists."

You mean the Isrealis right? Where exactly in Isreal? Are you sure that groups like Hamas are getting the property? That would certainly be terrorist support. They MUST give the Isrealis property in return, they should be rewarded for furthering the cause of peace. Otherwise it would indeed be a clear sign of corruption within our government.

You probably already know this but I'm going to mention it anyway:

The policy SHOULD be about moving innocent people within the local area. That would not be a bad move after all. We better do something to fix this stupid policy (as if enough haven't been created already). It would seem that although some Palestinians are occupying places that should be Isreal, it also seems to hold that some Isrealis are occupying places that were historically Palestine. Not all Palestinians are foreign invaders of those regions and not all are terrorists, some have been there for many many generations. Many are just simple merchants with families trying to exist on planet Earth. I've even met a Palestinian family who sends letters of protest and carefully organizes against Hamas, Islamic Jihad, traitors within the Isreali army, and other groups responisible for the suicide bombings and murders. Both the Isrealis and the Palestinians each have the right to live next to each other peacefully.

We do not automatically become terrorists by helping the innocent members of the Palestinian people so long as the exiled Isrealis are given the same amount of property in return (preferably with a reward in turn for helping to create a habitat for everyone). Right? Wasn't Isreal intended for peaceful coexistence? It would seem that anything less than that would be genocide for the Palestinians and a terrible loss for Isreal.


10 posted on 04/22/2005 7:35:26 AM PDT by Gava
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave

Amen. This is a truth that bears repeating and teaching to the youth of our nation over and over again.

11 posted on 04/22/2005 7:49:56 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
Well said betty. Patrick Henry opined the sdame...

"Bad men cannot make good citizens. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom. No free government, or the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue; and by a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles." Patrick Henry

We are beset by a significant percentage of the population and those who represent them whose views, ideologies, goals, and intent are the furthest thing from the principles this nation was founded upon. We must stand in that breach and ensure that those of a mind to support and defend the constitution and its underpinnings are elected in numbers enough to stay the course and win the day.

I believe we shall.

12 posted on 04/22/2005 7:55:22 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Kudos! Thanks for the ping!


13 posted on 04/22/2005 7:58:27 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
No tin foil with betty. She shines the light of truth on things in my experience and that can be rather blinding to those opposed to those truths, but also illuminating.

The fact is, there is a segment of our society, and particularly amongst some fairly well to do politicians, entertainers, academia, the media and other segments, who definitely do NOT want the founding principles of this Republic fostered amongst the rising generation in our society.

We are left to counter them and educate others all the same as best we can.

14 posted on 04/22/2005 8:00:26 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

You are welcome AG!


15 posted on 04/22/2005 8:00:50 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Every once in a while FR really shines brightly.

Thanks Jim.

Thanks Jeff.

16 posted on 04/22/2005 8:10:37 AM PDT by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain on the dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
This is a truth that bears repeating and teaching to the youth of our nation over and over again.

Exactly!

As a side note, my 11 year old daughters both picked the people they would most like to be for their 'living history' day at school.

One chose Thomas Jefferson, and the other chose Benjamin Franklin...(sigh) it's enough to make this Mom's heart proud!

17 posted on 04/22/2005 8:17:22 AM PDT by MamaTexan (*~ I'd rather stand with the few who are right than the many who are wrong ~*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: betty boop; Jeff Head
Thank you both so very much for your engaging posts!

There is much cause for Christians of all stripes to be extra alert these days.

Moreover, I encourage all Christians to rejoice even if the "jackals" should succeed in turning this country into an officially atheistic, ill behaved model of European culture - because, as that attitude spreads around the world, it suggests that Christ may be returning very soon. Maranatha!

And if it is not yet time for Him to return, then we should still rejoice because He will never leave or forsake us, no matter how tiny His remnant.

Therefore, as we wait in the hope of His appearing - if we keep walking in the Light, proclaiming Him and being loving and joyful - we will confuse and frustrate the tar out of those who are trying to demean, decry and demoralize us.

18 posted on 04/22/2005 8:17:47 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Borders ... Language ... Culture !!!

-- Michael Savage
19 posted on 04/22/2005 8:39:30 AM PDT by GeekDejure ( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!! -- Impeach Greer !!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Good screed Jeff.. In-alienable rights is the jist of America, not JUST plain old everyday rights.. Not that any other country has any rights of ANY kind they DON'T..

Big difference between privileges and "rights", especially in-alienable rights.. Every country(government) in this world allows privileges to the people NOT rights.. Did I say , EVERY country.?. Ah! yes..

Canada, England, URPean, Middle eastern and Asian countrys have ZERO RIGHTS.. merely privileges..

The founders of this country not only invented RIGHTS for the people but went a step further and made them in-alienable rights too.. The entire weight of the American Constitution rests on the 2nd amendment.. Because without revolution being made LEGAL by it.. the first amendment is Utopian rhetoric..

How can rights be deemed in-alienable.?. Where'd they come from those rights.?. God is the only answer.. They came from God.. God gave those rights, Who else.?... And an assault on the GOD that gave those rights is an assault on those rights..

The "Separation of Church and State" fiasco is a very assault on those rights.. There are other assaults too but those rights are being challenged by the very people that should love those rights the most.. LAWYERS.. morphed into politicians.. Politics in this country should be by "the people" not specially trained liars and obfuscators parsing things they do not understand.. and they DON'T.. Where are the arguments for Rights over privileges.?. Ever heard a lawyer arguing for that.?.

Lawyers are not trained to decrypt rights from privileges but instead are trained to obfuscate them.. The United States is the only country NOW and ever that has ever had any rights AT ALL.. in all of recorded HISTORY.. but those rights are only vouched safe by the 2nd amendment.. Gun "rights" people want their guns for WHAT.?. Target practice, hunting.?. It seems that it has come to that.. Even being FOR gun rights is no guarantee that they know what those rights guarantee.. with the will to use them for their intended purpose.. Cowards can still own guns.. for target practice.. so far..

20 posted on 04/22/2005 9:21:40 AM PDT by hosepipe (This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson