Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

This makes me sick. I've researched this a great deal and discovered that he can be charged with various other violations. This is an abuse of power. Ugh!
1 posted on 03/24/2005 8:08:39 AM PST by MatrixMetaphore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MatrixMetaphore

Welcome to FR.


2 posted on 03/24/2005 8:10:32 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore

I feel so much safer now.


3 posted on 03/24/2005 8:10:44 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore

"We'll only use the PATRIOT Act against terrorists."

I didn't believe it then, and I certainly don't believe it now. This is what happens when you give a government more power.


4 posted on 03/24/2005 8:12:37 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore
He's an idiot, not a terrorist.  This is not what the Act was intended for.
 

Owl_Eagle

5 posted on 03/24/2005 8:12:58 AM PST by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore

"We take the alleged actions of Mr. Banach very seriously, and we will not condone lying to federal agents," U.S. Attorney Christopher Christie said."

This is a way to attack the 5th amendment through the back door.

It's very close to making "failure to confess" a crime.


6 posted on 03/24/2005 8:13:16 AM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore
This makes me sick. I've researched this a great deal and discovered that he can be charged with various other violations.

I agree, he should be charged with all those other violations too. I can't believe they're going easy on him!!!

7 posted on 03/24/2005 8:13:54 AM PST by JohnnyZ ("Thought I was having trouble with my adding. It's all right now." - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore

How do you use a laser to look at the stars?


8 posted on 03/24/2005 8:14:28 AM PST by ladtx ( "Remember your regiment and follow your officers." Captain Charles May, 2d Dragoons, 9 May 1846)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore

Trying to crash planes is terrorism.

Prosecuting him sounds appropriate to me.


11 posted on 03/24/2005 8:15:53 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore

http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nj/publicaffairs/NJ_Press/files/pdffiles/banachcomplaint0104.pdf

Here is the Criminal Complaint


13 posted on 03/24/2005 8:16:48 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore

Well here is the first example of the prosecution of a citizen under a law created and allegedly reserved for terrorists.

Pure BS.


16 posted on 03/24/2005 8:17:07 AM PST by Pylot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore
The man is guilty of "Felony Stupid" he ought to be charged with every single charge possible.

If he had dropped a 747 into New York City, the same people who think he is being picked on would want to lynch him.
The only reason it didn't happen was his incompetence, and that is a damned poor defense.

SO9

17 posted on 03/24/2005 8:17:07 AM PST by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore

Actualyl, pre-9/11 it was considered a criminal act to interfere with a pilot in any way.

Just FYI.


18 posted on 03/24/2005 8:17:22 AM PST by MacDorcha ("Do you want the e-mail copy or the fax?" "Just the fax, ma'am.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore

So, this fella was just having a good time, and deserves no punishment for his behavior?

He jeopardized the safety of the pilots and passengers. He also engaged in an act that terrorists use to triangulate the distance of a plane in order to shoot it down.

The difference between radical Libertarians and Democrats is that the latter have no principles. The former have STUPID principles.


23 posted on 03/24/2005 8:18:33 AM PST by neocon1984 (end the idiocy of post-modernism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore
Banach's lawyer, Gina Mendola-Longarzo, said her client was using the laser to look at stars with his daughter when the plane was hit by the beam.

Do I file this lame excuse under "B" for Bravo Sierra, or "U" for Unbelievable Bravo Sierra?

26 posted on 03/24/2005 8:19:30 AM PST by steveegg (Attacking each other is just what the LIEberals and pro-death lawyers want us to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore
This is an abuse of power. Ugh!

Is it?  How do you know?  What are all the facts of the case?  Can he prove he was with his daughter?  A telescope with a laser sight is a pretty serious piece of equipment--does he actually own one?  What star was he looking at that he was able to hit the eyes of the pilot of an approaching aircraft?  What are the circumstances of the lie the FBI states the suspect told?  Why did a Grand Jury indict the suspect?

Since your a n00b, you should know that most people here expect conclusions based on facts from posters.

29 posted on 03/24/2005 8:21:08 AM PST by Psycho_Bunny (“I know a great deal about the Middle East because I’ve been raising Arabian horses" Patrick Swazey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore

Once is an accident, three times? The guy either as intent or is a total moron with possible disastrous consequences. Throw the jerk in jail for awhile and fine the heck out of him.


38 posted on 03/24/2005 8:25:44 AM PST by ezo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MatrixMetaphore

Surely this schmuck can be charged with something else?

You know, reckless endangerment, contributory negligence...something other than the Patriot Act. Yes?


42 posted on 03/24/2005 8:27:19 AM PST by RexBeach (If Bill Clinton is in a room alone, is anyone really there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Annie03; Baby Bear; BJClinton; BlackbirdSST; Blue Jays; BroncosFan; Capitalism2003; dAnconia; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.

Yeah the patriot act will only be used against terrorist to keep americans safer.Like how they prosucuted paypal.com for allowing net gambling payments and how they charged that new york gangbanger under the patriot act and nowthis guy. and this is under republicans just wait until the dims win the white house you havent even begun to see abuse of power yet.This is all just a warm up

43 posted on 03/24/2005 8:27:40 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Jacques Chirac and Kofi Annan, a pantomime horse in which both men are playing the rear end. M.Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson