Posted on 03/23/2005 5:09:24 PM PST by Hildy
You are in your 20's, and you're visiting somebody in the hospital. You pass by a room where somebody is all contorted up, in a vegitative state. Would you say to your husband:
a)Honey, Don't ever let me live in that condition.
b )Honey, If I ever get like that, please make sure you do everything in your power, whatever the cost to you and our family, financially and emotionally, to keep me in that vegitative state no matter how long it takes. I want you to come and sit by my side every day and go home alone every night. I want to have strangers tend to my most personal needs. If I don't respond in four or five years, make sure I'm kept alive by a feeding tube in my stomach. And, most importantly, if you're not sure if I know what's going on around me, please err on the side of caution and keep me in that bed, indefinitely.
Remember, you're 24 years old. Which one would you pick?
I would say "don't sacrifice your soul just to do something that you think will keep me from suffering."
Seriously.
I could tell them "if I get in that condition, please blow my head off with a shotgun" too, but it wouldn't be right.
It's very sad. I have to admit I've cried now more than once.
I'm sure you'd say (a) at that age. Anyone at that age would say it, and carelessly.
And that's precisely the problem with the evidence they're trying to use to starve Terri. How could anyone know what they would want in that situation until they're in it, and it's too late to tell anyone?
Look, there are no issues here of terminal illness or "right to die." Terri is perfectly healthy. This is a simple "quality of life" case.
If you believe that one person has the right to tell another that their quality of life makes it not worth living, then take the side of Michael Schiavo.
If you believe that every life is worthwhile in its own right, no matter how retarded or crippled a person is, then take her family's side.
Oops--that should be A. Sorry.
I'm still working on the being of "sound mind" part.
Thanks for sharing that one.
My mother had her respirator turned off at age 44 after a brain hem 2 days after the incident.
If there had been any brain activity at all and any response at all I would have not allowed the respirator turned off.
You and me, both.
John Wayne and I have something in common. :-}
No one disputes that Terri had three years of intensive therapy. The Schindlers testified under oath they know their daughter is PVS. All her guardian ad litems said she was PVS. This case has been the most scrutinized, litigated case of its kind.
I am 25 years old. I believe life should be continued until natural death occurs. And no, I do not see imposed starvation and dehydration as a "natural" death. Yes, I have my explicit wishes in writing, and my husband and mother are aware of my wishes.
Now, am I really not going to have to hear from you on a Terri Schiavo thread again, or is this another stunt to get attention, as was your "opus?"
Oh...so we're NOT talking about the Schiavo case? The husband in the Schiavo scenario has NOT "gone home alone every night" for, what, 10 years?
Put it in writing....or assume that there are some "crazy" people out there who will try to save your life.
We just don't *really* know what Terri wanted....I'd rather err on the side of LIFE. Then, after rehab, she can punch me in the face.
If I had a family as loving as the Schindlers I wouldn't mind being in Terri's state with the feeding tube. Commencing at age 24. You are way too cold on this one.
#1 Terri has a great family willing to take care of her.
#2 Michael Schiavo is a total liar. Not to be trusted on what he claims Terri said
Too bad your mind cannot wrap itself around the above two achingly obvious facts. You are sucked in by M Schiavo. You actually believe this scumbag. Admit it
you sure?
I could have sworn that she hasnt been allowed to have any legitimate therapy to allow her (possibly) to eat via her mouth or stuff like that.. Physical type therapy...
oh well...
I still would hope my wife would starve me to death if I was like that.
I know I wouldn't want to be in that condition and my wife and I are working on living wills to prevent it. In Terri's case it isn't nearly so clear cut. All we have is the word of a man who was once her husband who managed to forget that she didn't want to live for several years.
If Terri is truly unaware what difference does it make if her parents keep her alive.
Beyond that, I would hope that he, along with our children would respect my wishes not to live in that condition, whatever it would take short of putting them in legal jeopardy. I can't imagine Terri would approve of the behavior of anyone in this ordeal.
It's relevant because there's the idea that this isn't what she wanted. I'm saying this is probably what she would have wanted.
Please read up on this case. Everyone testified, INCLUDING her parents that she is in a PVS.
I'm sorry for your loss.
There's a big difference between turning off a machine and deliberately starving someone to death.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.