Posted on 03/12/2005 10:21:07 AM PST by donprocto
Look, if you are one of those Conservatives who will abstain from voting for Rice, you very will might end up with Hillary. Honestly, how can you abstain when the end result might be a Socialist?
That is not what Rice said. She left it a lot more wide open.
Most Americans are mildly pro-choice.
You can marginalize youself or not.
Keep this stance and you will have no say on anything.
Check out this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1361535/posts
If Rush Limbaugh is saying he would back MCLAIN over Hillary, then what does that say about Rice?
Who me?
Read what I typed.
I am with you on that. 100%.
Her position is that abortion should not be used as a form of birth control. She supports paretnal notification and a ban on partial birth.
Please show me where Bush differs with her.
We're being pulled in that direction now anyway - and Republicans control the government. The problem is, in order to get more Republicans elected, we are settling for more liberal candidates on the local level. Ehrlich, Bloomburg, Schwarzenegger - there are more - all Republicans, and all liberals. Where do we draw the line?
Me too. However politics aside, the Presbyterian church hasn't exactly been the shining star of religion in the last few decades IMO.
After all they financially supported Angela Davis in her defense at trial and support the gay agenda financially today.
With regards from a former Presbyterian.
STILL, I agree, when it comes to politics my hope is that Condi would win hands down against the Hildabeast!
What part of the word 'libertarian' are you misunderstanding? Bush didn't say that.
I would vote for McCain over Rice (that sounds funny...McCain over Rice) because his public record and his voting record has been solidly pro-life.
he can't. it wouldnt support his rant (or his blog hits) if he had to research it anyway.....
I can live with that.
LOL! I was here looking for some stimulating conversation. If I wanted you at my blog, I wouldn't have posted my rant here for your convenience. Come on people. Blast my positions all you want. Don't question my motives.
You are going entirely off of the deep end with that one.
I know Abortion is important, but the President, regardless of who it is, can't affect it one way or the other that much. A President (especially with her husband as the head of the UN) could affect a significant and traumatic change in everything we know and hold dear. Just remember that as you rant and rant and rant please.
McCain is much much much worse of a choice than Rice and only marginally better than Clinton.
I think Hillary in the white house would cause the most conservative among us to long for the days of her husband. And that's bad.
This is false. I heard President Bush state that his goal is to protect every innocent life in the law. I heard him say that at the last 4 Marches for Life in DC on the telephone.
That clearly would not be Rice's goal.
Stop dissembling.
LOL
you just said you would support a media whore like McCain over Rice. Your rant is senseless.
I will just ignore you from now on.
Non Sequiter with a vieled Ad Hominem.
All I'm asking is that you compare and contrast Bush's stance on abortion with Rice's. How are they differnet?
Better Rice than Rudy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.