Dr. Rice Enters the Matrix (Photo)

Blaster's Blog ^ | 2/23/05 | Blaster

[finnman69]

I pick up today's WaPo out of the snow, and this was the front page image:

Click for bigger.

I don't think that anyone, anywhere, could ask for better imagery. Just look at the placement it got. Even more interesting, there is not a story about the Secretary of State on the front page.

Applauding soldiers, the American flag, stylish in all black - those boots are made for walking, no doubt. I know the editorial board over at the Post loved General Powell, but he never got anything like this.

[Howlin]

Good lord, look at the spikes on those boots!

[rudypoot]

I like this one better for some reason...

[Howlin]

It was founded by a notorious Marxist for the purpose of bringing Socialism to America.

Look out! Black helicopters are right over your house!

[Republican Wildcat]

Some believe she is nothing more than a CFR flunkie.

Yes, we know. Fortunately more are smarter than that.

[McBuff]

Remember. ..Condi is not just a "woman". . .she is a conservative, African-American woman. . .she cuts into other demographics that would scare the bejesus out of the Dems. . .Hillery, by the way, the last time I checked was ALSO a woman.

One more thing. .Dr. Rice would make a great president and during her campaign she would more than reassure her doubters that she is highly qualified and capable. Another thing. . .probably a lot of those 20% are older white men who will have four more years to die off.

CONDI CRUSHES HILLERY, OBAMA OR ANYBODY ELSE THE DEMS DIG UP!!!

[eskimo]

Look out! Black helicopters are right over your house!

You "black helicopter" and "hinfoil hat" freaks are just too much.

[Howlin]

You "CFR is Marxist" freaks wear very thin.

[eskimo]

Yes, we know. Fortunately more are smarter than that

Well, if you can prove that history was not recorded correctly, you should do so now.

[Dead Corpse]

Wowsers...

[eskimo]

You "CFR is Marxist" freaks wear very thin.

I'm certain you have a reason for ignoring historical fact but I doubt you will share that reason with us.

[Bones75]

"I won't bet on being "pleasantly surprised". We would be sickened from being ruled over by another "President Clinton". It is not worth the risk. Besides, I'm right about this. "

I respectfully disagree. Who else do we have that could be Hillary? Don't underestimate the power of them "female president" aspect.

If we neutralized that, we'd have a much better chance. I think we run a bigger risk by running a no-name, stuffy old republican who doesn't connect with the people.

I think she could beat Hill. Imagine the Dems trying to trash the character of the potential first black female president. They'd be dead in the water.

Bones

[Howlin]

I'm certain you have a reason for ignoring historical fact but I doubt you will share that reason with us.

My "reason" is that I actually live in the real world, arm myself with facts, and stay away from whacko web sites.

[Bones75]

I agree with you on one thing for SURE. The need to beat Hill.

If it's Condi that does it, if it's some as-yet unnamed person who does it, it must be done.

As I said in another thread, I would vote for a moldy cheese sandwich for president if it was running against Hillary.

I can't fathom the damage that horrible witch would do to this country.

Bones

[Palladin]

You have just sung the swan song of fat old white male Republican candidates.

[eskimo]

My "reason" is that I actually live in the real world, arm myself with facts, and stay away from whacko web sites.

If you are so armed with facts, why don't you present some of those facts that prove I am mistaken?

[Howlin]

Because I don't want to waste my time on you. Period.

[advance_copy]

probably a lot of those 20% are older white men

There's a lot of Christian conservatives who won't vote for a woman (I Tim 2:12). They all voted for George Bush, but they won't bother to show at the polls if the GOP nominates Condi (who also has said she's "pro-choice", which will hurt the pro-life vote). The GOP loses not 20% of their votes, but 40% (remember the 20% from the poll yesterday was from all Americans, not just GOP voters who are slightly over one half). You're wrong about Condi beating Hillary, it won't happen and we'll all be very very sad. Not worth the risk.

[Dog Gone]

Dr. Rice Rocks!

[Conservatrix]

Yes, I know. "Damage" is the operative word!

WHo else do you think can (realistically, comfortably?) beat her?

[Guillermo]

Why would anyone who isn't a Marxist belong to a Marxist organization?

Seems kind of weird to me...