Posted on 02/06/2005 12:53:31 PM PST by Cupertino Mom
... the district filed a motion on Jan. 31 to dismiss the lawsuit. The district said in the motion that there's no factual evidence to back Williams' claim that his constitutional rights were violated. The motion also countered Williams' argument that he and his lesson plans were singled out for review by Principal Patricia Vidmar because of his religion. The motion stated that parental complaints prompted the actions.
(Excerpt) Read more at cupertinocourier.com ...
That is so cute!
that us parents WANT Williams to have his day in court,
So does the school...except that they filed a motion to dismiss...
If you don't like the laws then have your boy Dubya CHANGE them.
Well you see, that is not the job of a president but of congress.
But I am sure with your fine education you knew that.
Something else of note:
Cupertino Mom trolled two threads on the day they signed p that had been dead since November 30th.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1288010/posts?page=45#45
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1290545/posts?page=17#17
They waited until today to post this thread because they didn't draw the attention they'd hoped in their two previous posts.
Since we didn't believe them, alakapoof, 'another mom' shows up.
I smell ozone.
Great.
Just what we need, THREE of them.
Oh, by the way, Little Precious, you spelled it as "Faux News" on your site. Just wanted you to keep you consisten in your elitism.
Too bad he wasn't advocating "Death to America", pasting pro-homosexual material on his door, or praising terrorists.
There would have been NO problem.
Grab the gang, thread's back.
I have been reading the motion to dismiss, (what can I say? I am borded today. Hacking up a lung is not very entertaining!)
That Ms. Vidmar’s preview and restriction of plaintiff’s supplemental handouts were directed toward avoiding a potential Establishment Clause violation should make it easier to justify her actions. Clearly, defendants had the right to control plaintiff’s curricular choices even where potential entanglement with religion was not an issue. However, since the plaintiff’s supplemental handouts were decidedly religious in nature, it should be noted that the First Amendment prohibits the establishment of religion before it prohibits the abridgment of speech. It is therefore understandable why constitutional concerns about the state entangling itself in religion overrides concerns about the state protecting an individual’s right to free speech.
Am I reading this right? Do they think the first amendment lists things in order of importance?
So my right to petition the government for a redress of grievances is superseded by someone else's right to freedom of speech?
Now you can't post your "Victoly!" thread at DU or wherever you three (one) came from.
They have those at Crate & Barrel?
I was actually thinking about asking the mods to at least put it in the Smoky Backroom. After all, it's not every day when I browbeat a Leftist mental cripple like a broken record and get it to sign up and attack me. 
Y'all don't mind my bighead for a couple of minutes, do you?
LOL!!
What I liked was that it signed up either three times, or it had two of it's friend sign up and none of them could sound convincing.
I think it was all the same person, but my angle was to pretty much keep hammering the site itself, and I guess it couldn't handle it anymore.
No true educated "Christian" will align itself in any manner with raw sewage like Kos, but mindless Borg hippies will.
Exactly.
I think it was all the same person as well.
I stuck them in my personal "insider fraud troll" list.
And, Maureen continues to sparkle!
LOL! yikes.
I think the one claiming to be the Flinn girl was the first to try that but I could have missed a few.
Agreed.
Seems that way.
Keeley Finn is still an active handle last I knew, but now only shows two posts.
Trollicus trifectii destroyed, thread reinstated.
Certification of troll deaths required.
Paving also required.
Click the Graphic J
Anymore Trolls want some of this?
(Be sure and "Click the Pic".)
LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
