Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California's "Bogus" Energy Crisis in Retrospect
ChronWatch.com ^ | 1/4/05 | Wayne Lusvardi and Charles B. Warren

Posted on 01/04/2005 1:40:18 PM PST by WayneLusvardi

Edited on 04/10/2005 2:08:56 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

California's "Bogus" Energy Crisis in Retrospect: Enron or Endrun? Running out of sky, not energy

"To most people the name Enron is associated with all that is wrong with corporate America and as the cause of the California energy crisis of 2000-02. The nicknames of Enron's notorious energy trading maneuvers -- "Death Star," "Fat Boy," "Ricochet," and "Get Shorty" – are now even well known by the public. When U.S. Senator Tom Daschle wanted to state his opposition to pending legislation he coined a new verb - "I don't want to Enron the people of the United States." But in 2000 Enron pulled out of the California energy market after only six months, and gouging by merchant energy traders could not have singularly caused the state's energy crisis."

California's ''Bogus'' Energy Crisis in Retrospect by Wayne Lusvardi and Charles B. Warren


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: california; calpowercrisis; energycrisis; enron
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

21 posted on 01/05/2005 1:31:42 AM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi
Good article. Thanks for writing it and posting it here.

Too bad you weren't here on FR during the "calpowercrisis" days back in 2000-2001. We FReepers pretty much had all this figured out and documented. It's all still here, if anyone can find it :-(

BTW, one thing that we FReepers noticed three years before anybody else was that all that money Gray Davis borrowed was (and still is) unconstitutional, since the borrowing was not put before the voters as the California Constitution requires.

Not that anybody in California has actually read their Constitution...

22 posted on 01/05/2005 2:05:11 AM PST by snopercod ("When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk." - The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend

BTT!!!!!!


23 posted on 01/05/2005 3:06:40 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
...back in 2000-2001. We FReepers pretty much had all this figured out and documented. It's all still here, if anyone can find it :-(


To find all articles tagged or indexed using calpowercrisis, click below:
  click here >>> calpowercrisis <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)

24 posted on 01/05/2005 3:10:50 AM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Thanks. That's a lot better than it was.

It used to only display the last 30 articles on the "stack", but it seems to go back to about Jan 2002 now.

It still doesn't display about 1000 earlier articles that Ernest & I tagged.

25 posted on 01/05/2005 4:03:12 AM PST by snopercod (I want to see Arthur C. Clarke out there with a shovel cleaning up debris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi

The sweethearts still in power, saddled us with energy bankruptcy and a structural deficit for which we're still paying. California Democrats are a gift that keeps on giving.


26 posted on 01/05/2005 4:09:11 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
It still doesn't display about 1000 earlier articles that Ernest & I tagged.

I thought there were a lot of missing links- thanks for the confirmation.

27 posted on 01/05/2005 4:14:34 AM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Back in the "olden days" when google would find most things on FR, Ernest & I spent a few weeks going back through old posts and tagging them with a message addressed To:calpowercrisis.

Later on, the system was "enhanced" so that one could post a message to *calpowercrisis.

The messages tagged the old way are not picked up under the new system. [Here's] an example from May, 2001 with some of your old links.

28 posted on 01/05/2005 4:22:59 AM PST by snopercod (I want to see Arthur C. Clarke out there with a shovel cleaning up debris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

Thanks- I notice from my tagline I was a sarcastic SOB even then...


29 posted on 01/05/2005 4:31:23 AM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

...but you've mellowed ;-)


30 posted on 01/05/2005 4:40:23 AM PST by snopercod (I want to see Arthur C. Clarke out there with a shovel cleaning up debris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
...but you've mellowed ;-)

I'll have to tell Mrs. B that-- she'll die laughing.

31 posted on 01/05/2005 4:45:51 AM PST by backhoe ("It's so easy to spend someone else's money." [ My Dad, circa 1958])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
Don't forget that under "deregulation" utilities had to sell their generation facilities and the new owners recapitalized the costs and raised the rent
32 posted on 01/05/2005 5:29:33 AM PST by tubebender (If I had know I would live this long I would have taken better care of myself...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Robert357; Ernest_at_the_Beach; snopercod
"along with lots of money to political consultants to top Democrats in the State of California and nationally."

You mean like how over 85% of the "Superfund" monies went to Consultants & Lawyers???

33 posted on 01/05/2005 6:17:50 AM PST by SierraWasp (Moderates, are just too chicken to commit to any ideal!!! They prefer sophist sophistication...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

Sufferin' succotash! Sophist sophistication alert!


34 posted on 01/05/2005 6:19:55 AM PST by snopercod (I want to see Arthur C. Clarke out there with a shovel cleaning up debris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

Some people are a sop for sophistry, ya know... especially in CA!!!


35 posted on 01/05/2005 6:23:20 AM PST by SierraWasp (Moderates, are just too chicken to commit to any ideal!!! They prefer sophist sophistication...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
You mean like how over 85% of the "Superfund" monies went to Consultants & Lawyers???

Now go easy, I am both a consultant and an engineer so not all money to consultants is a waste. What I was referring to was "political" consultants and lawyers, not technical consultants, who may (or may not) provide societal value.

Before I started this office, I worked for an large US firm that did both electric utility and other kinds of work, including hazardous waste clean up consulting. I was involved with a couple of haz waste projects at non-superfund sites.

What I observed was that attorneys were the de-facto leaders of those projects and just about everything done was done on the basis of CYA and how it might look in future litigation.

Just as when liability concerns impose themselves on medicine the number of marginally required tests (blood tests, biopsy, x-rays, MRI's, etc.) to document conditions skyrockets, so to does the ground water sampling, aquifer mapping & modeling, soil sampling, etc.) happen on the haz waste clean up side.

The company I left wanted to get out of electric utility business design and consulting work and wanted me to market haz waste clean-up to electric utilities. I told them no-thanks, that I wanted to contribute to the GNP, not be a drag upon it.

Consultants can provide value-added benefits or they can be used to fill file cabinets with CYA documents. I prefer the former for a career path.

36 posted on 01/05/2005 10:14:47 AM PST by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

marking


37 posted on 01/05/2005 11:42:27 AM PST by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; snopercod
Need more Power? Build More Power Plants! Dumb-bells! ! !

What's sarcastic about that?....it's still true, and the DemonicRats still don't want to build more power plants.

38 posted on 01/05/2005 12:13:12 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
What I observed was that attorneys were the de-facto leaders of those projects and just about everything done was done on the basis of CYA and how it might look in future litigation.

A true class of parasites is what many lawyers....not all ...are turning into.

39 posted on 01/05/2005 12:18:13 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Robert357; SierraWasp
Hey Robert. Did you ever catch that article I posted on companies building "wildcat" power plants in China?

Apparently, if some city or factory needed power, they just built a power plant.

It reminded me of the early days here in America.

40 posted on 01/05/2005 12:39:36 PM PST by snopercod (I want to see Arthur C. Clarke out there with a shovel cleaning up debris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson